Strategic reliance on phonological mediation in lexical access

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 333-344

  Milota, Vanessa C ^a   Widau, Audra A ^a   McMickell, Montie R ^a   Juola, James F ^a   Simpson, Greg B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; SEMANTICS; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0030972237     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211289     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ANTOS, S. J. (1979). Processing facilitation in a lexical decision task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 527-545.
2. ATKINSON, R. C., & JUOLA, J. F. (1973). Factors influencing speed and accuracy of word recognition. In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV (pp. 583-612). New York: Academic Press.
3. BECKER, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8, 493-512.
4. BRODEUR, D. A., & LUPKER, S. J. (1994). Investigating the effects of multiple primes: An analysis of theoretical mechanisms. Psychological Research, 57, 1-14.
5. BURGESS, C., TANENHAUS, M. K., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1989). Context and lexical access: Implications of nonword interference for lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 620-632.
6. CARR, T. H., & POLLATSEK, A. (1985). Recognizing primed words: A look at current models. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & E. M. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 5, pp. 1-82). San Diego: Academic Press.
7. COLLINS, A. M., & LOFTUS, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
8. COLTHEART, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). New York: Academic Press.
9. COLTHEART, M., CURTIS, B., ATKINS, P., & HALLER, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
10. COLTHEART, M., DAVELAAR, E., JONASSON, J. T., & BESNER, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535-555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. DAVELAAR, E., COLTHEART, M., BESNER, D., & JONASSON, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access. Memory & Cognition, 6, 391-402.
12. DEN HEYER, K., BRIAND, K., & SMITH, L. (1985). Automatic and strategic effects in semantic priming: An examination of Becker's verification model. Memory & Cognition, 13, 228-232.
13. GILLUND, G., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-62.
14. HAWKINS, H. L., REICHER, G. M., ROGERS, M., & PETERSON, L. (1976). Flexible coding in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 380-385.
15. HENIK, A., FRIEDRICH, F. J., TZELGOV, J., & TRAMER, S. (1994). Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming. Memory & Cognition, 22, 157-168.
16. HUMPHREYS, G. W., EVETT, L. J., & TAYLOR, D. E. (1982). Automatic phonological priming in visual word recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10, 576-590.
17. JARED, D., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1991). Does word identification proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 358-394.
18. LESCH, M. F. & POLLATSEK, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 285-294.
19. LUKATELA, G., LUKATELA, K., & TURVEY, M. T. (1993). Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual lexical access: TOWED primes FROG. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 461-466.
20. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1991). Phonological access of the lexicon: Evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 951-966.
21. LUKATELA, G., & TURVEY, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 123, 331-353.
22. LUPKER, S. J. (1984). Semantic priming without association: A second look. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 709-733.
23. MCCLELLAND, J. L., & RUMELHART, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
24. MCNAMARA, T. P. (1992). Priming and constraints it places on theories of memory and retrieval. Psychological Review, 99, 650-662.
25. MCQUADE, D. V. (1981). Variable reliance on phonological information in visual word recognition. Language & Speech, 24, 99-109.
26. MEYER, D. E., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227-234.
27. NEELY, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226-254.
28. NEELY, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. NEELY, J. H., KEEFE, D. E., & ROSS K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 1003-1019.
30. NELSON, D. L., MCEVOY, C. L., & SCHREIBER, T. A. (1993). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme and word fragment norms. Unpublished manuscript.
31. PAAP, K. R., NEWSOME, S. L., MCDONALD, J. E., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1982). An activation-verification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
32. PARKIN, A. J., & ELLINGHAM, R. (1983). Phonological receding in lexical decision: The influence of pseudohomophones. Language & Speech, 26, 81-90.
33. PATTERSON, K. E., & MORTON, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface dyslexia: Neuropsychological and cognitive studies of phonological reading (pp. 335-359). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. PERFETTI, C. A., & BELL, L. (1991). Phonemic activation during the first 40 ms of word identification: Evidence from backward masking and priming. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 473-485.
35. PETER, M., & TURVEY, M. T. (1994). Phonological codes are early sources of constraint in visual semantic categorization. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 497-504.
36. RATCLIFF, R., & MCKOON, G. (1988). A retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 95, 385-408.
37. ROSSON, M. B. (1983). From SOFA to LOUCH: Lexical contributions to pseudoword pronunciation. Memory & Cognition, 11, 152-160.
38. RUBENSTEIN, H., LEWIS, S. S., & RUBENSTEIN, M. A. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 10, 645-654.
39. SCHVANEVELDT, R. W., & MCDONALD, J. E. (1981). Semantic context and the encoding of words: Evidence for two modes of stimulus analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 673-687.
40. SEIDENBERG, M. S., & MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
41. SHALLICE, T., WARRINGTON, E. K., & MCCARTHY, R. (1983). Reading without semantics. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 111-138.
42. SIMPSON, G. B., & KANG, H. (1994). The flexible use of phonological information in word recognition in Korean. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 1-13.
43. SOLSO, R. L., & JUEL, C. L. (1980). Instrumentation and techniques: Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two-through nine-letter English words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 12, 297-343.
44. STONE, G. O., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1993). Strategic control of proceasing in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 744-774.
45. TWEEDY, J. R., LAPINSKI, R. H., & SCHVANEVELDT, R. W. (1977). Semantic-context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying proportion of items presented in an appropriate context. Memory & Cognition, 5, 84-89.
46. UNDERWOOD, G., ROBERTS, M., & THOMASON, H. (1988). Strategical invariance in lexical access: The reappearance of the pseudohomophone effect. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 24-34.
47. VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181-198.
48. VAN ORDEN, G. C., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
49. VAN ORDEN, G. C., JOHNSTON, J. C., & HALE, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 371-386.
50. VAN ORDEN, G. C., PENNINGTON, B. F., & STONE, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
51. WATERS, G. S., & SEIDENBERG, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13, 557-572.