Guidelines for the evaluation of eye irritation alternative tests: Criteria for data submission

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 13-22

  Scala, R A ^b   Springer, J ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC; IRRITANT AGENT; PESTICIDE; SOAP;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; CONFERENCE PAPER; EYE IRRITATION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; TOXICITY TESTING; ANIMAL; ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVE; ARTICLE; DANGEROUS GOODS; DRUG EFFECT; EYE; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; STATISTICS;

ANIMALIA;

ANIMAL TESTING ALTERNATIVES; ANIMALS; EYE; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; IRRITANTS; STATISTICS; TOXICITY TESTS;

EID: 0030971204     PISSN: 02786915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-6915(96)00102-0     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (3)

1. Bradlaw J., Gupta K., Green S., Hill R. and Wilcox N. (1995) Practical application of non-whole animal alternatives: Summary of IRAG Workshop on Eye Irritation Testing. Toxicologist 15, 287.
2. Feder P. I. et al. (1991) The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: An Evaluation of In Vitro Alternatives to the Draize Primary Eye Irritation Test. (Phase I) Hydro-alcoholic Formulations; (Part 1) Statistical Methods. In Vitro Toxicology 4, 231-246.
3. Gettings S. D. et al. (1991) The CTFA Evaluation of Alternatives Program: An Evaluation of In Vitro Alternatives to the Draize Primary Eye Irritation Test. (Phase I) Hydro-alcoholic Formulations; (Part 2) Data Analysis and Biological Significance. In Vitro Toxicology 4, 247-288.