Effects of anesthesia of the palmar digital nerves on kinematic gait analysis in horses with and without navicular disease

American Journal of Veterinary Research

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 218-223

  Keegan, Kevin G ^a   Wilson, Daniel J ^b,c   Wilson, David A ^a   Frankeny, Rebecca L ^a   Loch, Wayne E ^c   Smith, Bryan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b University of Missouri   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; MEPIVACAINE;

ARTICLE; GAIT DISORDER; HORSE; LOCAL ANESTHESIA; METACARPAL BONE; NERVE BLOCK; NONHUMAN; SUBCUTANEOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; FORELIMB; GAIT; HEAT; HORSE DISEASES; HORSES; JOINTS; LAMENESS, ANIMAL; POSTURE; REFERENCE VALUES; TARSAL BONES; VIDEO RECORDING;

ANIMALIA; EQUIDAE; EQUUS CABALLUS;

EID: 0030969774     PISSN: 00029645     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Lowe JE. Sex, breed and age incidence of navicular disease, in Proceedings. Am Assoc Equine Pract 1974;20:37-46.
2. Asquith RL, Kivipelt J. The navicular syndrome. J Equine Vet Sci 1994;14:408-410.
3. Turner TA. Diagnosis and treatment of the navicular syndrome in horses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 1989;5:131-144
4. MacGregor CM. Radiographic assessment of navicular bones based on changes in the distal nutrient foramina. Equine Vet J 1986;18:203-206.
5. Østblom L, Lund C, Melsen F. Navicular bone disease: a comparative histomorphometric study. Equine Vet J 1989;21:431-433.
6. Wright IM. A study of 118 cases of navicular disease: clinical features. Equine Vet J 1993;25:488-492.
7. Anderson BH, Turner TA. Diagnostic findings using a navicular protocol, in Proceedings. Am Assoc Equine Pract 1993;390: 209-211.
8. Merkens HW, Schamhardt HC. Evaluation of equine locomotion during different degrees of experimentally induced lameness 1: lameness model and quantification of ground reaction force patterns of the limb. Equine Vet J Suppl 1988;6:99-106.
9. Dyson S. Problems associated with the interpretation of the results of regional and intra-articular anaesthesia in the horse. Vet Rec 1986;118:419-422.
10. Rose RJ, Allen JR, Hodgson DR, et al. Studies on isoxsuprine hydrochloride for the treatment of navicular disease. Equine Vet J 1983;15:238-243.
11. Wright IM. A study of 118 cases of navicular disease: treatment by navicular suspensory desmotomy. Equine Vet J 1993;25: 501-509.
12. Turner AS, Tucker CM. The evaluation of isoxsuprine hydrochloride for the treatment of navicular disease: a double blind study. Equine Vet J 1989;21:338-341.
13. Crisman MV, Furr MO, Ley WB, et al. Evaluation of polysulfated glycosaminoglycan for the treatment of navicular disease: a double blind study, in Proceedings. Am Assoc Equine Pract 1993; 39:219-220.
14. American Association of Equine Practitioners. Guide for veterinary service and judging of equestrian events. 4th ed. Lexington, Ky: American Association of Equine Practitioners, 1991;19.
15. Adrian M, Grant B, Ratzlaff M, et al. Electrogoniometric analysis of equine metacarpophalangeal joint lameness. Am J Vet Res 1977;38:431-435.
16. Clayton HM. Cinematographic analysis of the gait of lame horses III: chronic sesamoiditis. J Equine Vet Sci 1986;6:310-320.
17. Back W, Barneveld A, van Weeren PR, et al. Kinematic gait analysis in equine carpal lameness. Acta Anat 1993;146:86-89.
18. Ratzlaff MH, Grant BD, Adrian M. Quantitative evaluation of equine carpal lameness. J Equine Vet Sci 1982;2:78-88.
19. Clayton HM. Cinematographic analysis of the gait of lame horses III: fracture of the third carpal bone. J Equine Vet Sci 1987; 7:130-135.
20. Peloso JG, Stick JA, Soutas-Little RW, et al. Computer-assisted three-dimensional gait analysis of amphotericin-induced carpal lameness in horses. Am J Vet Res 1993;54:1535-1543.
21. Buchner F, Kastner J, Girtler D, et al. Hüftbewegung des pferdes:vergleichende kinematische untersuchung bei lahmheitsfreien und spatlahmen pferden. Pjerdeheilkunde 1992;8:23-30.
22. Clayton HM. Cinematographic analysis of the gait of lame horses IV: degenerative joint disease of the distal intertarsal joint. J Equine Vet Sci 1987;7:274-278.
23. Clayton HM. Cinematographic analysis of the gait of lame horses. Equine Vet Sci 1986;6:70-78.
24. Buchner HHF, Savelberg HHCM, Schamhardt HC, et al. Limb movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore-or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28:63-70.
25. Buchner HHF, Savelberg HHCM, Schamhardt HC, et al. Head and trunk movement adaptations in horses with experimentally induced fore-or hindlimb lameness. Equine Vet J 1996;28:71-76.
26. Jeffcott LB, Dalin G, Drevemo S, et al. Effect of induced back pain on gait and performance of trotting horses. Equine Vet J 1982;14:129-133.
27. May SA, Wyn-Jones G. Identification of hindleg lameness. Equine Vet J 1987;19:185-188.
28. Buchner F, Kastner J. Girder D, et al. Quantification of hind limb lameness in the horse. Acta Anat 1993;146:196-199.
29. Drevemo S, Roepstorff L, Kallings P, et al. Application of Trackeye in equine locomotion research. Acta Anat 1993;146:137-140.
30. Peloso JG, Stick JA, Caron JP, et al. Effects of hylan on amphotericin-induced carpal lameness in equids, Am J Vet Res 1993; 54:1527-1534.
31. Ratzlaff MH. Current methods for the analysis of locomotion and their potential clinical application, in Proceedings. Am Assoc Equine Pract 1989;35:99-127.
32. Huskamp B, Tietje S, Nowak M, et al. Fußungs und Bewegungsmuster gesunder und strahlbeinkranker Pferde-gemessen mit dem Equine-Gait-Analysis-System (EGA-System). Pjerdeheilkunde 1990;6:231-236.
33. 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate uptake in the navicular area of horses with lameness isolated to the foot by anesthesia of the palmar digital nerves. Am J Vet Res 1996;57:415-421.
34. Leach D. Recommended terminology for researchers in locomotion and biomechanics of quadrupedal animals. Acta Anat 1993;146:130-136.
35. Schamhardt HC, Merkens HW. Objective determination of ground contact of equine limbs at the walk and trot: comparison between ground reaction forces, accelerometer data and kinematics. Equine Vet J Suppl 1994;17:75-79.
36. Ratzlaff MH, Wilson PD, Hyde ML, et al. Relationships between locomotor forces, hoof position and joint motion during the support phase of the stride in galloping horses. Ada Anat 1993;146: 200-204.
37. Quddus MA, Kingsbury HP, Rooney JP. A force and motion study of the foreleg of a Standardbred trotter. J Equine Med Surg 1978;2:233-242.
38. Holmström M, Fredricson I, Drevemo S. Biokinematic differences between riding horses judged good and poor at a trot. Equine Vet J Suppl 1994;17:51-56.
39. Back W, Schamhardt HC, Savelberg HHCM, et al. How the horse moves: 1. Significance of graphical representations of equine forelimb kinematics. Equine Vet J 1995;27:31-38.
40. Jansen MO, van Raaij JAGM, van den Bogert AJ, et al. Quantitative analysis of computer-averaged electromyographic profiles of intrinsic limb muscles in ponies at the walk. Am J Vet Res 1992;53:2343-2349.
41. van Weeren PR, van den Bogert AJ, Back W, et al. Kinematics of Standardbred trotters measured at 6, 7, 8, and 9 m/s on a treadmill before and after 5 months of training. Acta Anat 1993;146: 154-161.
42. Morris EA, Seeherman HJ. Redistribution of ground reaction forces in experimentally induced equine carpal lameness. In: Gillespie JR, Robinson NE, eds. Equine exercise physiology 2. Davis, Calif: ICEEP Publications, 1987;553-572.
43. Nyquist H. Certain topics in telegraph transmission theory. Trans Am Inst Electr Eng 1928;47:617-644.
44. Linford RL. Camera speeds for optoelectronic assessment of stride-timing characteristics in horses at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1994;55:1189-1195.