Discordance between two abdominal umbilical arterial flow velocity waveforms in normal pregnancy

Journal of Maternal-Fetal Investigation

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 38-40

  Nakai, Yuichiro ^a   Imanaka, Motoharu ^a   Nishio, Junko ^a   Suzuki, Shin Ichiro ^a   Oka, Tomoko ^a   Ogita, Sachio ^a  

^a School of Medicine   (Japan)

Author keywords

Abdominal umbilical artery; Discordant umbilical arterial flow; Doppler flow velocimetry

Indexed keywords

ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; ARTERY RESISTANCE; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UMBILICAL ARTERY;

EID: 0030967187     PISSN: 09396322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Trudinger BJ, Cook CM. Different umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms in one patient. Obstet Gynecol 1988;71:1019-21.
2. Harper MA, Murnaghan GA. Discordant umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms and pregnancy outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989;96: 1449-50
3. Dolkart LA, Reimers FT, Kuonen CA. Discordant umbilical arteries: ultrasonographic and Doppler analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:59-63.
4. Nishida H, Sakanoue M, Kurachi K, Asada A, Kubo S. Fetal growth curve in Japanese. Jpn J Neonatol 1984;20:90-7.
5. Planiol T, Pourcelot L. Doppler effect study of the carotid circulation. In: M de Vlieger, DN White, VR McCready (eds): Ultrasonics in Medicine. New York: Elsevier, 1973:104-111.