Environmentally compatible surfactants for the cosmetic industry

International Journal of Cosmetic Science

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 227-237

  Berger, H ^a  

^a HENKEL KGAA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Amphoteric; Anionic; Biodegradation; Cationic; Cosmetics; Ecology; Ecotoxicity; Nonionic; Risk assessment; Surfactants

Indexed keywords

ANIONIC SURFACTANT; CATIONIC SURFACTANT; NONIONIC SURFACTANT; SURFACTANT;

BIODEGRADATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; COSMETIC INDUSTRY; ECOTOXICOLOGY; NONHUMAN; RISK ASSESSMENT; WASTE WATER;

EID: 0030966329     PISSN: 01425463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-2494.1997.171718.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. European Commission. Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on the Assessment of Risks to Man and the Environment of Substances notified in accordance with Directive 67/584/EEC on Dangerous Substances. Off. J. Europ. Comm. L227, September 1993.
2. Gerike, P., Winkler, K. and Jakob, W. Gewässeruntersuchugen im Stromgebiet des Rheins und ökologische Folgerungen. Tenside Surg. Det. 26, 270 (1989).
3. Council Directive 73/404/EEC on the Approximation of the Laws of the Member States Relating to Detergents and Amendments for the Biodegradability Testing 82/243/EEC (Anionic Surfactants) and 82/242/EEC (Nonionic Surfactants).
4. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals Vol. 1. OECD, Paris (1993).
5. Gerike, P., Holtmann, W. and Jasiak, W. A test for detecting recalcitrant metabolites. Chemosphere 13, 121-41 (1984).
6. Environmental Risk Assessment of Detergent Chemicals. Proceedings of the AISE/CESIO Limelette III Workshop, 28-29 November 1995. AISE/CESIO, Brussels (1996).