The role of microtubule assembly dynamics in mitotic force generation and functional organization of living cells

Journal of Structural Biology

Volumn 118, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 87-93

  Inoué, Shinya ^a  

^a MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; MICROTUBULE; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030966222     PISSN: 10478477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jsbi.1996.3839     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Brinkley B. R., Valdivia M. M., Tousson A., Balczon R. D. The kinetochore: Structure and molecular organization. Mitosis: Molecules and Mechanisms. 1989;Academic Press, New York. p. 77-118.
2. Cassimeris L., Salmon E. D. Kinetochore microtubules shorten by loss of subunits at the kinetochores of prometaphase chromosomes. J. Cell Sci. 98:1991;151-158.
3. Cassimeris L., Pryer N. K., Salmon E. D. Real-time observations of microtubule dynamic instability in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 107:1988;2223-2231.
4. Cassimeris L., Rieder C. L., Salmon E. D. Microtubule assembly and kinetochore directional instability in vertebrate monopolar spindles: Implications for the mechanism of chromosome congression. J. Cell Sci. 107:1994;285-297.
5. Cole N. B., Lippincott-Schwartz J. Organization of organelles and membrane traffic by microtubules. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 7:1995;55-64.
6. Coue M., Lombillo V. A., McIntosh J. R. Microtubule depolymerization promotes particle and chromosome movementin vitro. J. Cell Biol. 112:1991;1165-1175.
7. D. K. Fygenson, 1995, Microtubules: The Rhythm of Assembly and the Evolution of Form, Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ.
8. Gibbons I. R., Rowe A. J. Dynein: A protein with adenosine triphosphate activity from cilia. Science. 149:1965;424-426.
9. Gorbsky G. J., Ricketts W. A. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 122:1993;1311-1321.
10. Huxley H. E., Hanson J. Structural changes in the cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature. 173:1954;149-152.
11. Huxley A. F., Niedergerke R. Structural changes in muscle during contraction. Nature. 173:1954;147-149.
12. S. Inoué, 1951, Studies of the Structure of the Mitotic Spindle in Living Cells with an Improved Polarization Microscope, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
13. Inoué S. The effect of colchicine on the microscopic and sub-microscopic structure of the mitotic spindle. Exp. Cell Res. Suppl. 2:1952;305-312.
14. Inoué S. Polarization optical studies of the mitotic spindle. I. The demonstration of the spindle fibers in living cells. Chromosoma. 5:1953;199-208.
15. Inoué S. Organization and function of the mitotic spindle. Allen R. D., Kamiya N. Primitive Motile Systems in Cell Biology. 1964;549-598 Academic Press, New York.
16. Inoué S. Cell division and the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 91:1981;131-147.
17. Inoué S. Dynamics of mitosis and cleavage. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 582:1990;1-14.
18. Inoué S., Bajer A. Birefringence in endosperm mitosis. Chromosoma. 12:1961;48-63.
19. Inoué S., Dan K. Birefringence of the dividing cell. J. Morphol. 89:1951;423-456.
20. Inoué S., Salmon E. D. Force generation by microtubule assembly/disassembly in mitosis and related movements. Mol. Biol. Cell. 6:1995;1619-1640.
21. Inoué S., Sato H. Cell motility by labile association of molecules: The nature of mitotic spindle fibers and their role in chromosome movement. J. Gen. Physiol. 50:1967;259-292.
22. Inoué S., Fuseler J., Salmon E. D., Ellis G. W. Functional organization of mitotic microtubules: Physical chemistry of thein vivo. Biophys. J. 15:1975;725-744.
23. Koshland D. E., Mitchison T. J., Kirschner M. W. Polewards chromosome movement driven by microtubule depolymerizationin vitro. Nature. 331:1988;499-504.
24. Lombillo V. A., Stewart R. J., McIntosh J. R. Kinesin supports minus end-directed, depolymerization-driven motility of microspheres coupled to shortening microtubules. Nature. 373:1995;161-164.
25. McIntosh J. R., Hepler P. K., Van Wie D. G. Model for mitosis. Nature. 224:1969;659-663.
26. Mitchison T., Kirschner M. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature. 312:1984;237-242.
27. Mitchison T. J., Evans L., Schulze E., Kirschner M. Sites of microtubule assembly and disassembly in the mitotic spindle. Cell. 45:1986;515-527.
28. Nicklas R. B., Ward S. C., Gorbsky G. J. Kinetochore chemistry is sensitive to tension and may link mitotic forces to a cell cycle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 130:1995;929-939.
29. Ritter H., Inoué S., Kubai D. Mitosis inBarbulanympha. J. Cell Biol. 77:1978;638-654.
30. Salmon E. D. Pressure-induced depolymerization of spindle microtubules. VI. Production and regulation of chromosome movement. Goldman R., Pollard T., Rosenbaum J. Cell Motility, Cold Spring Harbor Conferences of Cell Proliferation. 1976;1329-1342 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor.
31. Salmon E. D. Microtubule dynamics and chromosome movement. Hyams J. S., Brinkley B. R. Mitosis: Molecules and Mechanisms. 1989;119-181 Academic Press, New York.
32. Sanger J. W., Sanger J. M. Video Supplement 2, Video tape contents, narration, and references. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 17:1990;356-372.
33. Schmidt W. J. Doppelbrechung der Kernspindel und Zugfasertheorie der Chromosomenbewegung. Chromosoma. 1:1939;253-264.
34. Sheldon E., Wadsworth P. Microinjection of biotin-tubulin into anaphase cells induces transient elongation of kinetochore microtubules and reversal of chromosome-to-pole motion. J. Cell Biol. 116:1992;1409-1420.
35. Summers K., Gibbons I. R. Adenosine-triphosphate-induced sliding of tubules in trypsin-treated flagella of sea urchin sperm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 68:1971;3092-3096.
36. Swann M. M. Protoplasmic structure and mitosis. I. The birefringence of the metaphase spindle and asters of the living sea-urchin egg. J. Exp. Biol. 28:1951a;417-433.
37. Swann M. M. Protoplasmic structure and mitosis. II. The nature and causes of birefringence changes in the sea-urchin egg at anaphase. J. Exp. Biol. 28:1951b;434-444.
38. Waterman-Storer C. M., Gregory J., Parsons S. F., Salmon E. D. Membrane/microtubule tip attachment complexes (TACs) allow the assembly dynamics of plus ends to push and pull membranes into tubulovesicular networks in interphaseXenopus. J. Cell Biol. 130:1995;1161-1169.
39. Weisenberg R. C. Microtubule formationin vitro. Science. 177:1972;1104-1105.
40. 2. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton. 18:1991;1-12.