Formation and homology of radular teeth; a case study using columbellid gastropods (Neogastropoda: Columbellidae)

Journal of Molluscan Studies

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 65-77

  Guralnick, Robert ^a   De Maintenon, Marta J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLUMBELLIDAE; GASTROPODA; NEOGASTROPODA;

EID: 0030962661     PISSN: 02601230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/mollus/63.1.65     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. BANDEL, K. 1974. The radulae of Caribbean and other Mesogastropoda and Neogastropoda. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 214: 1-188.
2. BOUCHET, P. & WARÉN, A. 1985. Revision of the northeast Atlantic bathyal and abyssal neogastropoda excluding Turridae (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Bollettino Malacologico, Supplemento 1: 123-296.
3. CRACRAFT, J. 1981. The use of functional and adaptive criteria in phylogenetic systematics. American Zoologist, 21: 21-36.
4. DE PINNA, M.C.C. 1991. Concepts and tests of homology in the cladistic paradigm. Cladistics, 8: 367-394.
5. HASZPRUNAR, G. 1988. On the origin and evolution of major gastropod groups, with special reference to the Streptoneura. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 54: 367-441.
6. HICKMAN, C.S. 1980. Gastropod radulae and the assessment of form in evolutionary paleontology. Paleobiology, 6: 276-294.
7. HOPKINS, T.L. & KRAMER, K.J. 1992. Insect cuticle sclerotization. Annual Review of Entomology, 37: 273-302.
8. ISARANKURA, K. & RUNHAM, N.W. 1968. Studies on the replacement of the gastropod radula. Malacologia, 7: 71-91.
9. LUTFY, R.G. & DEMIAN, E.S. 1964. The histology of the radula and the radular sac of Marisa cornuarietis (L.). A'in Shams Science Bulletin, 10: 97-118.
10. MARCUS, E. & MARCUS, E. 1962. Studies on Columbellidae. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciencias e Letras da Universidade de Säo Paulo. Boletim 261, Zoologia, 24: 335-384, 8 pls.
11. MACKENSTADT, U. & MÄRKEL, K. 1987. Experimental morphology of radular renewal in pulmonates (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Zoomorphology, 107: 209-239.
12. MISCHOR, B. & MÄRKEL, K. 1984. Histology and regeneration of the radula of Pomacea bridgesi (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia). Zoomorphology, 104: 42-66.
13. MOSKALEV, L.I. 1970. Gastropod Mollusca of the genus Colisella (Prosobranchia, Acmaeidae) of the fringing Asian seas of the Pacific Ocean. Transactions of the P. Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, 88: 174-212.
14. NIELSEN, J. & LETHBRIDGE, R. 1989. Feeding and the epiphyte food resources of gastropods living on leaves of the seagrass Amphibolis griffithii in south-western Australia. Journal of the Malacological Society of Australia, 10: 47-58.
15. PATTERSON, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. In: Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction (K.A. Joysey & A.E. Friday, eds), 21-74. Academic Press, London.
16. PETERS, W. 1979. Basal bodies in the odontoblasts of limpets, Patella coerulea L. (Gastropoda). Cell and Tissue Research, 202: 295-301.
17. PONDER, W.F. 1973. The origin and evolution of the Neogastropoda. Malacologia, 12: 295-338.
18. PONDER, W.F. & LINDBERG, D.R. 1996. Gastropod phylogeny - challenges for the 90s. In: Origin and evolutionary radiation of the Mollusca (J. Taylor, ed.), 135-154. Oxford University Press.
19. RADWIN, G.E. 1977. The family Columbellidae in the Western Atlantic. Veliger, 19: 403-417.
20. RAVEN, C.P. 1958. Morphogenesis: the analysis of molluscan development. Pergamon Press Inc., London.
21. RIEPPEL, O. 1988. Fundamentals of comparative biology, Birkhäuser, Basel and Boston.
22. RUNHAM, N.W. 1961. The histochemistry of the radula of Patella vulgata. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 102: 371-380.
23. RUNHAM, N.W. 1963. A study of the replacement mechanism of the pulmonate radula. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 104: 271-277.
24. SOLLAS, I.B.J. 1907. The molluscan radula: its chemical composition and some points in its development. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 51: 115-136.
25. TROSCHEL, F.H. 1856-1893. Das Gebiss der Schnecken zur Begründung einer natürlichen Classification. 2. Berlin.