Self-rating Barthel index compatible with the original Barthel index and the functional independence measure motor score

Journal of UOEH

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 107-121

  Hachisuka, Kenji ^a   Okazaki, Tetsuya ^a   Ogata, Hajime ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Barthel index; Functional Independence Measure; Self rating; Test retest reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RELIABILITY; SELF CARE; SELF EVALUATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030959148     PISSN: 0387821X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7888/juoeh.19.107     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Mahoney FI & Barthel DW (1965): Functional evaluation: the Barthel index. Md State Med J 14: 61-65
2. Granger CV, Albrecht GL & Hamilton BB (1979): Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES profile and the Barthel index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 60: 145-154
3. Wade DT & Langton Hewer R (1987): Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50: 177-182
4. Wade DT, Legh-Smith J & Langton Hewer R (1985): Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med 7: 176-181
5. Adams RJ, Meador KJ, Sethi KD, Grotta JC & Thomson DS (1987): Graded neurologic scale for use in acute hemispheric stroke treatment protocols. Stroke 18: 665-669
6. Wylie CM & White BK (1964): A measure of disability. Arch Environ Health 8: 834-839
7. Shinar D, Gross CR, Bronstein KS et al (1987): Reliability of the activities of daily living scale and its use in telephone interview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68: 723-728
8. Roy CW, Tognneri J, Hay E & Pentland B (1988): An inter-rater reliability study of the Barthel index. Int J Rehabil Res 11: 67-70
9. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA & Jaffe MW (1963): Studies of illness in the ages: the Index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 185: 914-919
10. Gresham GE, Phillips TF & Labi MLC (1980): ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 61: 355-358
11. Korner-Biensky N & Wood-Dauphinee S (1995): Barthel index information elicited over the telephone: is it reliable? Am J Phys Rehabil 74: 9-18
12. Yeo D, Faleiro R & Lincoln NB (1995): Barthel ADL index: a comparison of administration methods. Clin Rehabil 9: 34-39
13. McGinnis GE, Seward ML, DeJong G & Osberg JS (1986): Program Evaluation of physical medicine and rehabilitation departments using self-report Barthel. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67: 123-125
14. Gompertz P, Pound P & Ebrahim S (1994): A postal version of the Barthel Index. Clin Rehabil 8: 233-239
15. Hachisuka K, Ogata H, Ohkuma H, Tanaka S & Dozono K (1997): Test-retest and inter-method reliability of the self-rating Barthel index. Clin Rehabil 11: 28-35
16. Tanaka S, Ogata H & Hachisuka K (1990): Community rehabilitation systems: Studies on physical training for the disabled in Kitakyushu. Sangyo Ika Daigaku Zasshi (J UOEH) 12: 369-372
17. Hachisuka K, Dozono K, Ogata H, Fukuda M, Shiroyama Y, Takemoto A, Okuma H & Tanaka S (1995): UOEH version of the self-rating Barthel Index. Sogo Rihabiriteishon 23: 797-800
18. Hamilton BB, Granger CV, Sherwin FS, Zielezny M & Sherwin FS (1986): Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1: 59-74
19. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA & Fiedler RC (1994): Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). Scand J Rehabil Med 26: 115-119
20. Data Management Service of the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation and the Center for Functional Assessment Research (1991): Guide for use of the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation. (Chino N, translator). Keio University, Tokyo.
21. Cronbach LJ (1951): Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16: 297-334
22. Choen J (1960): A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measure 20: 37-46
23. Shah S, Vanclay F & Cooper B (1989): Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 42: 703-709
24. Kaplan CP & Corrigan JD (1994): The relationship between cognition and functional independence in adults with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 643-647
25. Diamond PT, Felsenthal G, Macciocchi SN, Butler DH & Lally-Cassady D (1996): Effect of cognitive impairment on rehabilitation outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 75: 40-43
26. Merbitz C, Morris J & Grip JC (1989): Ordinal scale and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 70: 308-312
27. Rasch G (1980): Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago.
28. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB & Granger C (1993): Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74: 566-573