Avoidance of sodium accumulation by the stomatal guard cells of the halophyte Aster tripolium

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 48, Issue 308, 1997, Pages 707-711

  Perera, L K R R ^a,b   De Silva, D L R ^a   Mansfield, T A ^a  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF SRI LANKA   (Sri Lanka)

Author keywords

Aster tripolium; potassium; Salinity tolerance; sodium; stomata

Indexed keywords

ASTER TRIPOLIUM; COMMELINA; COMMELINA COMMUNIS; TRIPOLIUM;

EID: 0030955695     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/48.3.707     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Assman SM, Zeiger E. 1987. Guard cell bioenergetics. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar GD, Cowan IR, eds. Stomatal function. Stanford University Press, 163-94.
2. Clint G. 1984. Ionic relations of stomatal guard cells. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.
3. Eshel A, Waisel Y, Ramati A. 1974. The role of sodium in stomatal movements of a halophyte: a study by X-ray microanalysis. In: Wehrmann J, ed. Proceedings of the 7th international colloquium on plant analysis and fertilizer problems. German Society of Plant Nutrition, Hannover.
4. Flowers TJ, Hajibagheri MA, Leach RP, Rogers WJ, Yeo AR. 1989. Salt tolerance in the halophyte Suaeda maritima. In: Plant water relations and growth under stress. Proceedings of the Yamada Conference XXII, Osaka, Japan, 173-80.
5. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. 1938. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Circular of California Agriculture Experimental Station 347, and Report of Smithsonian Institute 193, 461. Miscellaneous publication no. 3514: 1939.
6. Hoagland DR, Arnon DI. 1938. The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Circular of California Agriculture Experimental Station 347, and Report of Smithsonian Institute 193, 461. Miscellaneous publication no. 3514: 1939.
7. Huang CX, Canny MJ, Oates K, McCully ME. 1994. Planing frozen hydrated plant specimens for SEM observation and EDX microanalysis. Microscopy Research and Technique 28, 955-62.
8. Jarvis RG, Mansfield TA. 1980. Reduced stomatal responses to light, carbon dioxide and abscisic acid in the presence of sodium ions. Plant, Cell and Environment 3, 279-83.
9. Penny MG, Bowling DJF. 1974. A study of potassium gradients in epidermis of intact leaves of Commelina communis L. in relation to stomatal opening. Planta 119, 17-25.
10. Perera LKRR, Mansfield TA, Malloch AJC. 1994. Stomatal responses to sodium ions in Aster tripolium: a new hypothesis to explain salinity regulation in above-ground tissues. Plant, Cell and Environment 17, 335-40.
11. Robards AW, Sleytr UB. 1985. Low temperature methods in biological electron microscopy. Amsterdam, Elsevier.
12. Tallman G. 1992. The chemiosmotic model of stomatal opening revisited. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 11, 35-57.
13. Van Steveninck RFM, Van Steveninck ME, Stelzer R, Läuchli A. 1982. Studies on the distribution of Na and Cl in two species of lupins (Lupinus luteus and Lupinus angustifolius) differing in salt tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum 56, 465-73.