Hemodynamic characterization of the CarboMedics mitral valve prosthesis

Journal of Heart Valve Disease

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 115-122

  Bjørnerheim, Reidar ^a   Ihlen, Halfdan ^a   Simonsen, Svein ^a   Sire, Svein ^a   Svennevig, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART INDEX; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; LUNG VASCULAR RESISTANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; MITRAL VALVE PROSTHESIS; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPROSTHESIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0030954933     PISSN: 09668519     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ihlen H, Molstad P, Simonsen S, Vatne K, Ovrum E, Geiran O, Laake P, Froysaker T. Hemodynamic evaluation of the CarboMedics heart valve in the aortic position: Comparison of noninvasive and invasive techniques. Am Heart J 1992;123:151-159
2. Johnston RT, Weerasena NA, Butterfield M, Fisher J, Spyt TJ. CarboMedics and St. Jude Medical bileaflet valves: An in vitro and in vivo comparison. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1992;6:267-271
3. Chambers J, Cross J, Deverall P, Sowton E. Echocardiographic description of the CarboMedics bileaflet prosthetic heart valve. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21:398-405
4. Zhang Y, Ihlen H, Myhre E, Levorstad K, Nitter-Hauge S. Measurement of mitral regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 1985;54:384-391
5. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986:307-310
6. Cordoba M, Almeida P, Martinez P, Maravi C, Ramirez JA, Rabago G. Invasive assessment of mitral valve prostheses. In: Rabago G, Cooley DA (ed). Heart valve replacement: Current status and future trends. Futura Publishing Company, Inc., NY, 1987:375-389
7. Horstkotte D, Haerten K, Schulte DH. Hamodynamische Ruhe- und Belastungsuntersuchungen nach Implantation verschiedener Mitralklappenprothesen mit gleichem Aussendurchmesser. Z Kardiol 1983;72:385
8. Ely J. Duromedics bileaflet valves - clinical data summary from primary centers. First International Hemex Symposium on the Duromedics Bileaflet valve. Hemex Scientific, Inc., Austin, 1985:145
9. Holen J, Simonsen S, Froysaker T. An ultrasound Doppler technique for the noninvasive determination of the pressure gradient in the Bjork-Shiley mitral valve. Circulation 1979;59:436-442
10. Holen J, Simonsen S, Froysaker T. Determination of pressure gradient in the Hancock mitral valve from noninvasive ultrasound Doppler data. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1981;41:177-183
11. Gross CM, Wann LS. Doppler echocardiographic diagnosis of porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valve malfunction. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:1203-1205
12. Panidis IP, Ross J, Mintz GS. Normal and abnormal prosthetic valve function as assessed by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1986;8:317-326
13. Gibbs JL, Wharton GA, Williams GJ. Doppler ultrasound of normally functioning mechanical mitral and aortic valve prostheses. Int J Cardiol 1988;18:391-398
14. Burstow DJ, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, Reeder GS, Holmes DR, Seward JB, Tajik AJ. Continous wave Doppler echocardiographic measurement of prosthetic valve gradients. Circulation 1989;80:504-514
15. Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, Czer L, Maurer G. Effect of prosthetic aortic valve design on the Doppler-catheter gradient correlation: An in vitro study of normal St. Jude, Medtronic-Hall, Starr-Edwards and Hancock valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:324-332
16. Khan SS. Assessment of prosthetic valve hemodynamics by Doppler: Lessons from in vitro studies of the St. Jude valve. J Heart Valve Dis 1993;2:183-193
17. Baumgartner H, Schima H, Kuhn P. Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients across bileaflet aortic valve prostheses. Am J Cardiol 1993;71:1241-1243
18. Hatle L, Angelsen B, Tromsdal A. Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation 1979;60:1096-1104
19. Chambers J, Deverall P. Limitations and pitfalls in the assessment of prosthetic valves with Doppler ultrasonography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:495-501
20. Halle L, Angelsen B. Doppler ultrasound in cardiology. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1985:22-31
21. van den Brink RBA, Visser CA, Basart DCG, Duren DR, de Jong AP, Dunning AJ. Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal color Doppler flow imaging in patients with mechanical prostheses in the mitral valve position. Am J Cardiol 1989;63:1471-1474
22. Alton ME, Pasierski TJ, Orsinelli DA, Eaton GM, Pearson AC. Comparison of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography in evaluation of 47 Starr-Edwards prosthetic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20:1503-1511
23. Rahimtoola SH. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation 1978;58:20-24
24. Horstkotte D, Loogen F, Kleikamp G. Der Einfluss des prothetischen Herzklappenersatzes auf den natiirlichen Verlauf von isolierten Mitral- und Aortenklappenfehlern sowie Mehrklappenerkrankungen. Klinische Ergebnisse bei 783 Patienten bis zu 8 Jahren nach Implantation von Bjork-Shiley-Kippenscheibenprothesen. Z Kardiol 1983;72:494
25. Horstkotte D, Delaye J. The limits of central hemodynamic improvement by heart valve replacement. In: Horstkotte D, Loogen F (ed). Update in Heart Valve Replacement. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, Germany, 1986:43