Self-compatibility and heterosis in white clover (Trifolium repens L.)

Euphytica

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 341-348

  Michaelson Yeates, T P T ^a   Marshall, A ^a   Abberton, M T ^a   Rhodes, I ^a  

^a Plas Gogerddan   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dry matter; Heterosis; Self compatibility; Trifolium repens; White clover

Indexed keywords

TRIFOLIUM REPENS;

EID: 0030948818     PISSN: 00142336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1002989410326     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arunachalam, V., A. Bandyopadhyay, S.N. Nigam & R.W. Gibbons, 1984. Heterosis in relation to genetic divergence and specific combining ability in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 33: 33-39.
2. Atwood, S.S., 1940. Genetics of cross-incompatibility among self-incompatible plants of Trifolium repens. J Am Soc Agron 32: 955-968.
3. Atwood, S.S., 1941. Controlled self- and cross-pollination of Trifolium repens. J Am Soc Agron 33: 538-545.
4. Atwood, S.S., 1942a. Oppositional alleles causing cross-incompatibility in Trifolium repens. Genetics 27: 333-338.
5. Atwood, S.S., 1942b. Genetics of self-compatibility in Trifolium repens. J Am Soc Agron 34: 353-364.
6. Atwood, S.S., 1942c. Genetics of pseudo-self-compatibility and its relation to cross-incompatibility in Trifolium repens. J Agric Res 64: 699-709.
7. Bos, I. & P. Caligari, 1995. Selection methods in plant breeding. Plant Breeding Series. Chapman and Hall, London.
8. Bos, I. & L.D. Sparnaaij, 1993. Component analysis of complex characters in plant breeding. II. The pursuit of heterosis. Euphytica 70: 237-245.
9. Charcoset, A., M. Lefort-Buson & A. Gallais, 1991. Relationship between heterosis and heterozygosity at marker loci: a theoretical computation. Theor Appl Genet 81: 571-575.
10. de Vicente, M.C. & S.D. Tanksley, 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interspecific tomato cross. Genetics 134: 585-596.
11. Diers, B.W., P.B.E. McVetty & T.C. Osborn, 1996. Relationship between heterosis and genetic distance based on restriction fragment length polymorphism markers in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Crop Sci 36: 79-83.
12. Gibson, P.B. & C.C. Chen, 1973. Success in hybridising and selfing Trifolium repens at different temperatures. Crop Sci 13: 728-730.
13. Gritton, E.T., 1975. Heterosis and combining ability in a diallel cross of peas. Crop Sci 15: 453-457.
14. Isleib, T.G. & J.C. Wynne, 1983. Heterosis and testcrosses of 27 exotic peanut cultivars. Crop Sci 23: 832-841.
15. Jinks, J., 1983. Biometrical genetics of heterosis. In: Frankel (Ed.), Heterosis. Reappraisal of Theory and Practice. Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics 6, pp. 1-46. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
16. 1 barley hybrids. Euphytica 27: 587-591.
17. Kidwell, K.K., E.T. Bingham, D.R. Woodfield & T.C. Osborn, 1994. Relationships among genetic distance, forage yield and heterozygosity in isogenic diploid and tetraploid alfalfa populations. Theor Appl Genet 89: 323-328.
18. Lefort-Buson, M., B. Guillot-Lemoine & Y. Dattee, 1987. Heterosis and genetic distance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) crosses between European and Asiatic selfed lines. Genome 29: 413-418.
19. Mackey, J., 1976. Genetic and evolutionary principles of heterosis. In: A. Jánossy & F.G.H. Lupton (Eds.), Heterosis in Plant Breeding. Proc 7th Congress Eucarpia: 17-33, pp. 365. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest.
20. Mak, C. & T.C. Yap, 1977. Heterosis and combining ability of seed protein, yield and yield components in long bean. Crop Sci 17: 339-341.
21. Rotili, P., 1991. The role of selfing in the synthetic and hybrid varieties' constitution in the forage crops. In: Fodder Crops Breeding: Achievements, Novel Strategies and Biotechnology. Proceedings of the 16th Meeting of the Fodder Crops Section of Eucarpia, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 18-22 November 1990.
22. Sarawat, P., F.L. Stoddart, D.R.S. Marshall & S.M. Ali, 1994. Heterosis for yield and related characters in pea. Euphytica 80: 39-48.
23. Sparnaaij, I.D. & I. Bos, 1993. Component analysis of complex characters in plant breeding. I. Proposed method for quantifying the relative contribution of individual components to variation of the complex character. Euphytica 70: 225-235.
24. Stuber, C.W., S.E. Lincoln, D.W. Wolff, T. Helentjaris & E.S. Lander, 1992. Identification of genetic factors contributing to heterosis in a hybrid from two elite maize inbred lines using molecular markers. Genetics 132: 823-839.
25. 1 hybrid cultivars in Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleraceae var. gemmifera): an assessment of recombinant inbred lines. Ann Appl Biol 119: 331-337.
26. Williams, W., 1954. An emasculation technique for certain species of Trifolium. Agron J 46: 182-184.
27. Williams, W.M., 1987. Genetics and Breeding in White Clover. In: M.J. Baker & W.M. Williams (Eds), pp. 343-419. CAB International.
28. Woodfield, D.R. & E.T. Bingham, 1995. Improvement in two-allele autotetraploid populations of alfalfa explained by accumulation of favourable alleles. Crop Sci 35: 988-994.
29. Xiao, J., J. Li, L. Yuan & S.D. Tanksley, 1995. Dominance is the major genetic basis of heterosis in rice as revealed by QTL analysis using molecular markers. Genetics 140: 745-754.
30. Yamada, T., H. Fukuoka & T. Wakamatsu, 1989a. Recurrent selection programs for white clover (Trifolium repens L.) using self-compatible plants. I. Selection of self-compatible plants and inheritance of a self-compatibility factor. Euphytica 44: 167-172.
31. Yamada, T., S. Higuchi & A. Fukuoka, 1989b. Recurrent selection of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) using self-compatible factor, pp. 299-300. Proceedings of the XVI International Grassland Congress, Nice, France.