Leaf domatia and the distribution and abundance of foliar mites in broadleaf deciduous forest in Wisconsin

American Midland Naturalist

Volumn 137, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 337-348

  O'Dowd, Dennis J ^a,c   Willson, Mary F ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^c Inst of Pacific Islands Forestry   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACARI; ACER; ACER SACCHARUM; EUDICOTYLEDONS; PHYTOSEIIDAE; PRUNUS SEROTINA; PRUNUS VIRGINIANA; QUERCUS; QUERCUS RUBRA; QUERCUS VELUTINA; RIPARIA; SACCHARUM HYBRID CULTIVAR; TYDEIDAE; TYPHLODROMUS; VELUTINA; VITIS RIPARIA; VITIS SP.;

EID: 0030946978     PISSN: 00030031     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2426853     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. DICKE, M. 1997. Direct and indirect effects of plants on performance of beneficial organisms, in press In: J. R. Ruberson (ed.). Handbook of pest management. Marcel Dekker, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
2. _ AND M. W. SABELIS. 1988. How plants obtain predatory mites as bodyguards. Neth. J. Zool., 38: 148-165.
3. DUSO, C. 1992. Role of Amblyseius aberrans (Oud.), Typhlodromus pyri Scheuten and Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) (Acari, Phvtoseiidae) in vineyards. III. Influence of variety characteristics on the success of A. aberrans and T. pyri releases. J. Appl. Entomol., 114:455-462.
4. FLAHERTY, D. L. 1969. Ecosystem trophic complexity and Willamette mite, Eotetranychus willamettei Ewing (Acarina: Tetranychidae) densities. Ecology, 50:911-915.
5. _ AND M. A. HOY. 1971. Biological control of Pacific mites and Willamette mites in San Joaquin Valley vineyards: III. Role of rydeid mites. Res. Popul. Ecol., 13:80-96.
6. GROSTAL, P. AND D. J. O'DOWD. 1994. Plants, mites, and mutualism: leaf domatia and the abundance and reproduction of mites on Viburnum tinus (Caprifoliaceae). Oecologia, 97:308-315.
7. HARDIN, J. W. 1992. Foliar morphology of the common trees of North Carolina and adjacent states. North Carolina Agric. Res. Serv. Tech. Bull. 298. 135 p.
8. HLUCHY, M., Z. POSPISIL AND M. ZACHARDA. 1991. Phytophagous and predatory mites (Acari: Tetranychidae, Eriophyidae, Phytoseiidae, Stigmaeidae) in South Moravian vineyards, Czechoslovakia, treated with various types of chemicals. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 13:41-52.
9. KARBAN, R., G. ENGLISH-LOEB, M. A. WALKER AND J. THALER. 1995. Abundance of phytoseiid mites on Vitis species: effects of leaf hairs, domatia, prey abundance and plant phylogeny. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 19:189-197.
10. KNOP, N. F. AND M. A. HOY. 1983. Biology of a tydeid mite, Homeopronematus anconai (n. comb.) (Acari: Tydeidae), important in San Joaquin Valley vineyards. Hilgardia, 51:1-30.
11. KRANTZ, G. W. 1978. A manual of acarology, 2nd ed. Oregon State University Book Stores, Inc., Corvallis. 590 p.
12. LAING, J. E. AND N. F. KNOP. 1983. Potential use of predaceous mites other than Phytoseiidae for biological control of orchard pests, p. 28-35. In: M. A. Hoy, G. L. Cunningham and L. Knutson (eds.). Biological control of pests by mites. Agric. Exp. Stn. Div. Agric. Nat. Resour. Univ. Calif. Spec. Publ. No. 3304.
13. LUNDSTRÖEM, A. N. 1887. Von Domatien. Pflanzenbiologische Studien. II. Die Anpassung der Pflanzen an Thiere. Nova Acta Regiae Soc. Sci. Ups., Ser. 3, XIII:1-88.
14. O'DOWD, D. J., C. R. BREW, D. C. CHRISTOPHEL AND R. A. NORTON. 1991. Mite-plant associations from the Eocene of Southern Australia. Science, 252:99-101.
15. _ AND R. W. PEMBERTON. 1994. Leaf domatia in Korean plants: floristics, frequency, and biogeography. Vegetatio, 114:137-149.
16. _ AND M. F. WILLSON. 1989. Leaf domatia and mites on Australasian plants: ecological and evolutionary implications. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 37:191-236.
17. _ AND _. 1991. Associations between mites and leaf domatia. Trends Ecol. Evol., 6:179-182.
18. PEMBERTON, R. W. AND C. E. TURNER. 1989. Occurrence of predatory and fungivorous mites in leaf domatia. Am. J. Bot., 76:105-112.
19. PENZIG, O. AND C. CHIABRERA. 1903. Contribute alia conoscenza delle piante acarofile. Malphigia, 17: 429-487, plates 16-18.
20. PRICE, P. W., C. E. BOUTON, P. GROSS, B. A. MCPHERON, J. N. THOMPSON AND A. E. WEIS. 1980. Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 11:41-65.
21. ROZARIO, S. A. 1995a. Associations between mites and leaf domatia: evidence from Bangladesh, South Asia. J. Trop. Ecol., 11:99-108.
22. _. 1995b. Domatia and mites: effects of leaf morphology on beneficial mites in semi-natural and managed systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. 179 p.
23. VUORISALO, T., M. WALLS, P. NIEMALÄ AND H. KUITUNEN. 1989. Factors affecting mosaic distribution of galls of an eriophyid mite, Eriophyes laevis, in alder, Alnus glutinosa. Oikos, 55:370-374.
24. WALLACE, D. D. 1996. Leaf domatia and mites: variation and some consequences in association. Ph.D. Thesis, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia. 281 p.
25. WALTER, D. E. 1992. Leaf surface structure and the distribution of Phyloseius mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) in south-eastern Australian forests. Aust. J. Zool., 40:593-603.
26. _ AND H. A. DENMARK. 1991. Use of leaf domatia on wild grape (Vitus munsoniana Simpson) by arthropods in central Florida. Fla. Entomol., 74:440-446.
27. _ AND D. J. O'DOWD. 1992a. Leaf morphology and predators: effect of leaf domatia on the abundance of predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Environ. Entomol., 21:478-484.
28. _ AND _. 1992b. Leaves with domatia have more mites. Ecology, 73:1514-1518.
29. _ AND _. 1995a. Life on the forest phylloplane: hairs, little houses, and myriad mites, p. 325-351. In: M. E. Lowman and N. Nadkarni (eds.). Forest canopies. Academic Press, New York.
30. _ AND _. 1995b. Beneath biodiversity: factors influencing the diversity and abundance of canopy mites. Selbyana., 16:12-20.
31. _ AND _. 1997. The good, the bad, and the ugly: which really inhabit domatia? in press In: G. R. Needham, R. D. Mitchell, D. J. Horn and W. C. Welbourn (eds.). Acarology IX: symposia. Ohio Biological Survey, Columbus.
32. _, _ AND V. BARNES. 1994. The forgotten arthropods: mites in the forest canopy. Mem. Queensl. Mus., 36:221-226.
33. WHITMAN, D. 1994. Plant bodyguards: mutualistic interactions between plants and the third trophic level, p. 207-248. In: T. N. Ananthakrishnan (ed.). Functional dynamics of phytophagous insects. Oxford & IBH Publishing, New Delhi.
34. WILKINSON, L. 1996. Systat. Systat, Inc., Evanston, Illinois. 734 p.
35. WILLSON, M. F. 1991. Foliar shelters for mites in the eastern deciduous forest. Am. Midl. Nat., 126: 111-117.
36. _ AND D. J. O'DOWD. 1990. The relationship of leaf size and shoot length in Prunus americana to leaf-galling by mites. Am. Midl. Nat., 123:408-413.