Evaluation of the cross-incompatibility of 'peruvianum-complex' lines with Lycopersicon esculentum mill. by the ovule selection method

Breeding Science

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 33-37

  Takashina, Tadashi ^a   Imanishi, Shigeru ^a   Egashira, Hiroaki ^a  

^a YAMAGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

B1F1; cross incompatibility; F1 hybrid; L. chilense; L. peruvianum; L. peruvianum var. humifusum; Lycopersicon esculentum; ovule selection method

Indexed keywords

LYCOPERSICON CHILENSE; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PERUVIANUM VAR. HUMIFUSUM;

EID: 0030946976     PISSN: 05363683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs1951.47.33     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allen, S. M. and C. M. Rick (1986) Genetics and breeding. In : The tomato crop. A scientific basis for improvement. Atherton, J. G. and J. Rudich (eds.) Chapman and Hall, London, New York, 35-109.
2. Chen, L. Z. and Imanishi, S. (1991) Cross-compatibility between the cultivated tomato Lycopersicon esculentum and the wild species L. peruvianum, L. chilense assessed by ovule culture in vitro. Japan. J. Breed. 41 (2) : 223-230.
3. Hardon, J. J. (1967) Unilateral incompatibility between Solanum pennellii and Lycopersicon esculentum. Genetics 57 : 795-808.
4. Hogenboom. N. G. (1972) Breaking breeding barriers in Lycopersicon. 1. The genus Lycopersicon, its breeding barriers, and the importance of breaking these barriers. Euphytica 21 : 221-227.
5. Imanishi, S. (1988) Efficient ovule culture for the hybridization of Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum, L. glandulosum. Japan. J. Breed. 38 : 1-9.
6. _ (1991) Efficient ovule culture for the hybridization of Lycopersicon esculentum and the 'peruvianum -complex'. Proc. of ICOBB in Miyazaki. March, 11-13, 1991 : 97-104.
7. _, H. Egashira and T. Takashina (1993) The ovule selection method for intergeneric and interspecific hybridization in tomato. In: Wide crosses in plants and utilization of cell and tissue culture, (ed.) Takeda, G., 27th August 1993, Tokyo, Japan, 37-40.
8. _, _, H. Tanaka, S. Harada, R. Nishimura, S. Takahashi, T. Takashina and S. Oumura (1996) Development of interspecific hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum var. humifusum and introgression of wild type invertase gene into L. esculentum. Breed. Sci. 46(4) : 355-359.
9. Murashige, T. and F. Skoog (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissues. Physio. Plant.15 : 473-497.
10. 1 hybrid. J. Yamagata Agr. For. Soc. 41 : 17-20 (in Japanese).
11. Rick, C. M. (1960) Hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum pennellii : Physiology and cytogenetic significance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 46 : 78-82.
12. _, J. W. Deverna, R. T. Chetelat and M. A. Stevens (1987) Potential contribution of wild crosses to improvement of processing tomatoes. Act. Hortic. 200 : 45-55.
13. _ and J. I. Yoder (1988) Classical and molecular genetics of tomato : Highlights and perspectives. Ann. Rev. Genet. 22 : 281-300.
14. Snedecor, G. W. (1956) Statistical Methods. Iowa State College Press, 5th edition.
15. Taylor, I. B. (1986) Biosystematics of the tomato. In : The tomato crop. A scientific basis for improvement, (eds.) Atherton, O. J. G. and J. Rudich, Chapman and Hall, London, New York, 1-34.
16. Thomas, B. R. and D. Pratt (1981) Efficient hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum via embryo callus. Theor. Appl. Genet. 59 : 215-219.
17. Yamakawa, K. (1971) Effect of chronic gamma radiation on hybridization between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. peruvianum. Gamma Field Symp. 10 : 11-31.
18. _, K. Kuniyasu and N. Nagata (1978) Incorporation of disease resistant genes from Lycopersicon peruvianum into cultivated tomatoes. Gamma Field Symp. 17 : 45-60 (in Japanese).