A comparison of two antecubital fossa tests with personal care products

Journal of Toxicology - Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 19-30

  Ertel, Keith D ^a   Neumann, Paula B ^a   Keswick, Bruce H ^a   Kligman, Albert M ^b   Stoudemayer, Tracy ^b  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^b SKIN Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DETERGENT; SOAP;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLEANING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONAL HYGIENE; SAFETY; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN TEST; TOXICITY TESTING;

EID: 0030946273     PISSN: 07313829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/15569529709048885     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. T. Branna, Surfactants '95, Household Personal Prod. Ind. 32(6): 91, 1995.
2. P. J. Frosch and A. M. Kligman, The soap chamber test. A new method for assessing the irritancy of soaps, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 1(1): 35, 1979.
3. P. J. Frosch, Irritancy of soaps and detergent bars, in Principles of Cosmetics for the Dermatologist, P. Frost and S. N. Horwitz, Eds., C.V. Mosby Company, St. Louis, MO, 1982.
4. R. Wolf, Has mildness replaced cleanliness next to godliness? Dermatology 189: 217, 1994.
5. P. G. M. van der Valk, M. C. Crijns, J. P. Nater, and E. Bleumink, Skin irritancy of commercially available soap and detergent bars as measured by water vapour loss, Dermatosen 32(3): 87, 1984.
6. M. Rieger, Surfactant interactions with skin, Cosmet. Toilet. 110: 31, 1995.
7. A. M. Kligman, Assessment of mild irritants, in Principles of Cosmetics for the Dermatologist, P. Frost and S. N. Horwitz, Eds., C.V. Mosby, St. Louis, MO, 1982.
8. T. Agner and J. Serup, Seasonal variation of skin resistance to irritants, Br. J. Dermatol. 121: 323, 1989.
9. E. M. Jackson, Irritation and sensitization, in Clinical Safety and Efficacy Testing of Cosmetics, W. C. Waggoner, Ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 1990.
10. M. F. Lukakovic, F. E. Dunlap, S. E. Michaels, M. O. Visscher, and D. D. Watson, Forearm wash test to evaluate the clinical mildness of cleansing products, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 39: 355, 1988.
11. C. H. Lee and H. I. Maibach, Study of cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in man utilizing open application on subclinically irritated skin, Contact Derm. 30: 271, 1994.
12. P. J. Frosch and A. M. Kligman, The chamber-scarification test for irritancy, Contact Derm. 2: 314, 1976.
13. F. R. Bettley and E. Donoghue, The irritant effect of soap upon the normal skin, Br. J. Dermatol. 72: 67, 1960.
14. K. E. Malten, Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis, Contact Derm. 7: 238, 1981.
15. F. A. Simion, L. D. Rhein, G. L. Grove, J. M. Wojtkowski, R. H. Cagan, and D. D. Scala, Sequential order of skin responses to surfactants during a soap chamber test, Contact Derm. 25: 242, 1991.
16. T. Stoudemayer, P. Zheng, and A. M. Kligman, Hydration dermatitis. Occlusion alone rapidly injures human skin, Dermal Clinical Evaluation Society Scientific Poster Session, Montclair, NJ, June 8, 1993.
17. T. Agner and J. Serup, Time course of occlusive effects on skin evaluated by measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL), Contact Derm. 28: 6, 1993.
18. D. D. Strube, S. W. Koontz, R. I. Murahata, and R. F. Theiler, The flex wash test: A method for evaluating the mildness of personal washing products, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 40: 297, 1989.
19. M. S. Wortzman, Evaluation of mild skin cleansers, Dermatol Clin. 9(1): 35, 1991.
20. P. T. Sharko, R. I. Murahata, J. J. Leyden, and G. L. Grove, Arm wash with instrumental evaluation - a sensitive technique for differentiating the irritation potential of personal washing products, J. Derm. Clin. Eval. Soc. 2: 19, 1991.
21. F. Swanson, Clinical evaluation of a new neutral detergent bar, JAMA 162(5): 459, 1956.
22. P. B. Bryant, K. D. Ertel, B. H. Keswick, and B. R. Reed, Mild, synthetic personal cleansing bar well-tolerated by atopic dermatitis subjects, 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, New Orleans, LA, February 4-9, 1995.
23. G. A. Nicoll, J. Barrows, R. I. Murahata, A. Greene, J. J. Leyden, and G. L. Grove, Clinical implications of mild cleansing products for individuals undergoing acne therapy with Retin-A, 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, New Orleans, LA, February 4-9, 1995.
24. A, M. Kligman, Regression method for assessing the efficacy of moisturizers, Cosmet. Toilet. 93: 27, 1978.
25. L. Halkier-Sorensen and K. Thestrup-Pedersen, The efficacy of a moisturizer (Locobase) among cleaners and kitchen assistants during everyday exposure to water and detergents, Contact Derm. 29: 266, 1993.
26. Y. Appa, L. Hemingway, D. S. Orth, W. Laser, and L. Lockhart, Healing of dry skin with high glycerin therapeutic moisturizers, 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, New Orleans, LA, February 4-9, 1995.
27. M. Lodén, Biophysical properties of dry atopic and normal skin with special reference to effects of skin care products, Acta Derm. Venereol. (Stockh.), Suppl. 192: 1, 1995.
28. A. T. Lane and S. S. Drost, Effects of repeated application of emollient cream to premature neonates' skin, Pediatrics 92: 415, 1993.
29. L. Celleno, A. Mastroianni, A. Vasselli, M. V. Tolaini, and R. Macchia, Dermatological evaluation of cosmetic products for skin detergency, J. Appl. Cosmetol. 11: 1, 1993.
30. J. Pinnagoda, R. A. Tupker, T. Agner, and J. Serup, Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement, Contact Derm. 22: 164, 1990.
31. A. J. Bircher, Laser Doppler measurement of skin blood flux: variation and validation, in Handbook of Non-Invasive Methods and the Skin, J. Serup and G. B. E. Jemec, Eds., CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1995.
32. M. B. Finkey and D. M. Crowe, The use of evaporimetry to evaluate soap induced irritation on the face, Bioeng. Skin. 4: 311, 1988.
33. B. H. Keswick, K. D. Ertel, and M. O. Visscher, Comparison of exaggerated and normal use techniques for assessing the mildness of personal cleansers, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 43: 187, 1992.
34. E. M. de Boer, R. J. P. M. Scholten, W. G. van Ketel, and D. P. Bruynzeel, Quantitation of mild irritant reactions to repeated patch application of liquid cleansers. A laser Doppler flowmetry study, Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 12: 43, 1990.
35. D. van Neste and B. de Brouwer, Monitoring of skin response to sodium lauryl sulfate: clinical scores versus bioengineering methods, Contact Denn. 27: 151, 1992.
36. S. Freeman and H. I. Maibach, Study of irritant contact dermatitis produced by repeat patch test with sodium lauryl sulfate and assessed by visual methods, transepidermal water loss, and laser Doppler velocimetry, Irritant Contact Derm. 19: 465, 1988.
37. K.-P. Wilhelm, G. Freitag, and H. H. Wolff, Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: Evaluation of a cumulative human irritation model by noninvasive techniques, J. A.m. Acad. Dermatol. 31(6): 981, 1994.
38. T. Agner and J. Serup, Skin reactions to irritants assessed by non-invasive bioengineering methods, Contact Derm. 20: 352, 1989.
39. R. Goldner, Clinical tests, in Irritant Contact Dermatitis, E. M. Jackson and R. Goldner, Eds., Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, 1990.
40. O. H. Mills, L. J. Swinyer, and A. M. Kligman, Assessment of irritancy of cleansers, 43rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, Washington, D.C., December 1-6, 1984.
41. J. Serup and T. Agner, Colorimetric quantification of erythema - a comparison of two colorimeters with a clinical scoring scheme and laser-Doppler flowmetry, Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 15: 267, 1990.
42. E. Tur, G. Aviram, D. Zeltser, S. Brenner, and H. I. Maibach, Histamine effect on human cutaneous blood flow: regional variations, Acta Derm. Venereol. (Stockh.) 74: 113, 1994.