-
3
-
-
0001093552
-
-
a) F. N. Tebbe, P. Meakin, J. P. Jesson, E. L. Muetterties, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 1068;
-
(1970)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.92
, pp. 1068
-
-
Tebbe, F.N.1
Meakin, P.2
Jesson, J.P.3
Muetterties, E.L.4
-
4
-
-
0000148325
-
-
b) P. Meakin, L. J. Guggenberger, J. P. Jesson, D. H. Gerlach, F. N. Tebbe, W. G. Peet, E. L. Muetterties, ibid. 1970, 92, 3482;
-
(1970)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.92
, pp. 3482
-
-
Meakin, P.1
Guggenberger, L.J.2
Jesson, J.P.3
Gerlach, D.H.4
Tebbe, F.N.5
Peet, W.G.6
Muetterties, E.L.7
-
5
-
-
0000507155
-
-
c) P. Meakin, E. L. Muetterties, F. N. Tebbe, J. P. Jesson, ibid. 1971, 93, 4701;
-
(1971)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.93
, pp. 4701
-
-
Meakin, P.1
Muetterties, E.L.2
Tebbe, F.N.3
Jesson, J.P.4
-
6
-
-
0002747770
-
-
d) P. Meakin, E. L. Muetterties, J. P. Jesson, ibid. 1973, 95, 75.
-
(1973)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.95
, pp. 75
-
-
Meakin, P.1
Muetterties, E.L.2
Jesson, J.P.3
-
8
-
-
1842395504
-
-
For examples and references, see ref. [7]
-
For examples and references, see ref. [7].
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
1842388687
-
-
2 ligands, ref. [7]
-
2 ligands, ref. [7].
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
1842347055
-
-
in press
-
D. G. Gusev, R. Hübener, P. Burger, O. Orama, H. Berke, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, in press.
-
(1997)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
-
-
Gusev, D.G.1
Hübener, R.2
Burger, P.3
Orama, O.4
Berke, H.5
-
14
-
-
1842353990
-
-
For a compilation, see ref. [23a]
-
For a compilation, see ref. [23a].
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
0000216001
-
-
S. J. Vosko, M. Wilk, M. Nussair, Can. J. Phys. 1980, 58, 1200.
-
(1980)
Can. J. Phys.
, vol.58
, pp. 1200
-
-
Vosko, S.J.1
Wilk, M.2
Nussair, M.3
-
19
-
-
4243553426
-
-
c) A. Becke, Phys. Rev. 1988, A38, 3098.
-
(1988)
Phys. Rev.
, vol.A38
, pp. 3098
-
-
Becke, A.1
-
22
-
-
0038023343
-
-
a) E. J. Baerends, D. E. Ellis, P. E. Ros, Chem. Phys. 1973, 2, 41;
-
(1973)
Chem. Phys.
, vol.2
, pp. 41
-
-
Baerends, E.J.1
Ellis, D.E.2
Ros, P.E.3
-
27
-
-
0011191888
-
-
a) F. Maseras, M. Duran, A. Lledós, J. Bertrán, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2879;
-
(1991)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.113
, pp. 2879
-
-
Maseras, F.1
Duran, M.2
Lledós, A.3
Bertrán, J.4
-
28
-
-
0011158722
-
-
b) F. Maseras, M. Duran, A. Lledós, J. Bertrán, ibid. 1992, 114, 2922.
-
(1992)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.114
, pp. 2922
-
-
Maseras, F.1
Duran, M.2
Lledós, A.3
Bertrán, J.4
-
29
-
-
1842276073
-
-
3 complexes (Table 3) supports the notion that the former ligand is the stronger σ donor
-
3 complexes (Table 3) supports the notion that the former ligand is the stronger σ donor.
-
-
-
-
31
-
-
1842307736
-
-
Formal oxidation numbers and partial charges, obtained by quantum mechanical calculations, are both important but fundamentally different concepts, which have their advantages as well as limitations. For short comments and further literature, see ref. [21]
-
Formal oxidation numbers and partial charges, obtained by quantum mechanical calculations, are both important but fundamentally different concepts, which have their advantages as well as limitations. For short comments and further literature, see ref. [21].
-
-
-
-
32
-
-
0007049206
-
-
a) M. Kaupp, H. G. v. Schnering, Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 1076; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 986;
-
(1995)
Angew. Chem.
, vol.107
, pp. 1076
-
-
Kaupp, M.1
V. Schnering, H.G.2
-
33
-
-
84873995657
-
-
a) M. Kaupp, H. G. v. Schnering, Angew. Chem. 1995, 107, 1076; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 986;
-
(1995)
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
, vol.34
, pp. 986
-
-
-
38
-
-
0001682725
-
-
a) J. Li, R. M. Dickson, T. Ziegler, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11482;
-
(1995)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
, vol.117
, pp. 11482
-
-
Li, J.1
Dickson, R.M.2
Ziegler, T.3
-
40
-
-
0001175494
-
-
D. G. Gusev, D. Nietlispach, I. L. Eremenko, H. Berke, Inorg. Chem. 1993, 32, 3628.
-
(1993)
Inorg. Chem.
, vol.32
, pp. 3628
-
-
Gusev, D.G.1
Nietlispach, D.2
Eremenko, I.L.3
Berke, H.4
-
41
-
-
1842315320
-
-
-1, was established by fixing the angles -H-Fe-H at 72°, under the somewhat unreasonable assumption that all five equatorial ligands take on the angular arrangement of a regular pentagon. If this restriction is lifted, the two mechanisms mentioned above should become identical
-
-1, was established by fixing the angles -H-Fe-H at 72°, under the somewhat unreasonable assumption that all five equatorial ligands take on the angular arrangement of a regular pentagon. If this restriction is lifted, the two mechanisms mentioned above should become identical.
-
-
-
-
42
-
-
1842264317
-
-
For classical work on seven- and eight-coordination, compare ref. [27]. A good textbook treatment of molecular rearrangements can be found in ref. [28]
-
For classical work on seven-and eight-coordination, compare ref. [27]. A good textbook treatment of molecular rearrangements can be found in ref. [28].
-
-
-
-
47
-
-
0001185994
-
-
e) J. K. Burdett, R. Hoffmann, R. C. Fay, Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 2553.
-
(1978)
Inorg. Chem.
, vol.17
, pp. 2553
-
-
Burdett, J.K.1
Hoffmann, R.2
Fay, R.C.3
-
48
-
-
0004248765
-
-
Holt-Saunders, Japan
-
K. F. Purcell, J. C. Kotz, Inorganic Chemistry, Holt-Saunders, Japan, 1985, pp. 756.
-
(1985)
Inorganic Chemistry
, pp. 756
-
-
Purcell, K.F.1
Kotz, J.C.2
|