Effects of pulsed ultrasound on the frog heart: III. The radiation force mechanism

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 275-285

  Dalecki, Diane ^a,b   Raeman, Carol H ^b   Child, Sally Z ^a,b   Carstensen, Edwin L ^a,b  

^a University of Rochester   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic pressure; Bioeffect; Heart; Premature ventricular contraction; Pulsed ultrasound; Radiation force

Indexed keywords

NATURAL FREQUENCIES; PRESSURE EFFECTS; ULTRASONIC EFFECTS;

ACOUSTIC BEAM WIDTH; ACOUSTIC RADIATION FORCE MECHANISM; ACOUSTIC REFLECTOR; PREMATURE VENTRICULAR CONTRACTION;

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; AORTA PRESSURE; ARTICLE; DIASTOLE; FROG; HEART FUNCTION; HEART VENTRICLE EXTRASYSTOLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ULTRASOUND THERAPY;

ANIMALS; AORTA; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART; PRESSURE; RANA PIPIENS; ULTRASONICS; VENTRICULAR PREMATURE COMPLEXES;

EID: 0030944080     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-5629(96)00209-8     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beissner K. Acoustic radiation pressure in the near field. J Sound Vib 1984;93:537-548.
2. Beissner K. Radiation force calculations. Acustica 1987;62:255-263.
3. Carstensen EL. Biological effects of transmission line fields. New York: Elsevier, 1987.
4. Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, Fuchs G, Brendel W. In: Chaussy C, ed. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Technical concept, experimental research, and clinical applications. Munich: Karger, 1986.
5. Church CC, Flynn HG, Miller MW, Sacks PG. The exposure vessel as a factor in ultrasonically-induced mammalian cell lysis - II. An explanation of the need to rotate exposure tubes. Ultrasound Med Biol 1982;8:299-309.
6. Clarke PR, Hill CR. Physical and chemical aspects of ultrasonic disruption of cells. J Acoust Soc Am 1970;47:649-653.
7. Dalecki D, Keller BB, Carstensen EL, et al. Thresholds for premature ventricular contractions in frog hearts exposed to lithotripter fields. Ultrasound Med Biol 1991a;17:341-346.
8. Dalecki D, Carstensen EL, Parker KJ, Bacon DR. Absorption of finite amplitude focused ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 1991b; 89:2435-2447.
9. Dalecki D, Keller BB, Raeman CH, Carstensen EL. Effects of pulsed ultrasound on the frog heart: I. Thresholds for changes in cardiac rhythm and aortic pressure. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993a;19:385-390.
10. Dalecki D, Raeman CH, Carstensen EL. Effects of pulsed ultrasound on the frog heart: II. An investigation of heating as a potential mechanism. Ultrasound Med Biol 1993b;19:391-398.
11. Dalecki D, Child SZ, Raeman CH, Carstensen EL. Tactile perception of ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:3165-3170.
12. Delius M, Hoffmann G, Steinbeck G, Conzen P. Biological effects of shock waves: Induction of arrhythmia in piglet hearts. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994;20:279-285.
13. Dunn F, Averbuch AJ, O'Brien WD, Jr. A primary method for the determination of ultrasonic intensity with the elastic sphere radiometer. J Acoust Soc Am 1977;38:58-61.
14. Dyson M, Woodward B, Pond JB. Flow of red cells stopped by ultrasound. Nature 1971;232:572-573.
15. Foster KR, Wiederhold ML. Auditory responses in cats produced by pulsed ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;63:1199-1205.
16. MacRobbie AG, Raeman CH, Child SZ, Dalecki D. Thresholds for premature contractions in mouse hearts exposed to pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1997;(In press).
17. Mihran RT, Barnes FS, Wachtel H. Temporally-specific modification of myelinated axon excitability in vitro following a single ultrasound pulse. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990;16:297-309.
18. Miller DL, Nyborg WL, Whitcomb CC. In vitro clumping of platelets exposed to low intensity ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1978;4:545-553.
19. Miller DL, Nyborg WL, Whitcomb CC. Platelet aggregation induced by ultrasound under specialized conditions in vitro. Science 1979;205:505-507.
20. Moore TJ. Vibratory stimulation of the skin by electrostatic field: Effects of size of electrode and site of stimulation on thresholds. Am J Psychol. 1968;81:235-240.
21. Muir TG, Carstensen EL. Prediction of nonlinear acoustic effects at biomedical frequencies and intensities. Ultrasound Med Biol 1980;6:345-357.
22. Nyborg WL, Gershoy A, Miller DL. Interaction of ultrasound with simple biological systems. In Conference Proceedings Ultrasonics International 1977. Guildford, Surrey: IPC Science and Technology Press, Ltd., 1977:19-27.
23. Riehle RA, Newman RC. Principles of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1987.
24. Sacks PG, Miller MW, Church CC. The exposure vessel as a factor in ultrasonically-induced mammalian cell lysis - I. A comparison of tube and chamber systems. Ultrasound Med Biol 1982; 8:289-298.
25. Tsirulnikov EM, Vartanyan IA, Gersuni GV, et al. Use of amplitude-modulated focused ultrasound for diagnosis of hearing disorders. Ultrasound Med Biol 1988;14:277-285.