The Medical College of Georgia complex figures: Reliability and preliminary normative data using an intentional learning paradigm in older adults

Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 144-146

  Ingram, Fred ^a,b   Soukup, Vicki M ^c   Fishel Ingram, Pamela T ^d  

^a University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine   (United States)

^b Transitional Learning Community   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

^d Institute for Living   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Alternate forms; Complex figure; Memory; Neuropsychology; Test retest reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RELIABILITY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AGED; AGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOMETRICS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0030943090     PISSN: 0894878X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Meador KJ, Moore EE, Nichols ME, et al. The role of cholinergic systems in visuospatial processing and memory. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1993;15:832-42.
2. Rey A. L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encephalopathic traumatique [in french]. Arch de Psychol 1941;28:286-340.
3. Taylor LB. Localization of cerebral lesions by psychological testing. Clin Neurosurg 1969;16:269-87.
4. Casey MB, Winner E, Hurwitz I, DaSilva D. Does processing style affect recall of the Rey-Osterrieth or Taylor Complex Figures? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1991;13:600-6.
5. Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.
6. Tombaugh TN, Faulkner P. Hubley AM. Effects of age on the Rey-Osterrieth and Taylor Complex Figures: test-retest data using an intentional learning paradigm. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1992:14:647-61.
7. Tombaugh TN, Hubley AM. Four studies comparing the Rey-Osterrieth and Taylor Complex Figures. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1991;13:587-99.
8. Geffen GM, Butterworth P, Geffen LB. Test-retest reliability of a new form of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT). Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1994;9:303-16.
9. Rasmusson DX, Bylsma FW, Brandt J. Stability of performance on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1995; 10:21-6.
10. Youngjohn JR, Larrabee GJ, Crook TH. Test-retest reliability of computerized everyday memory measures and traditional tests. Clin Neuropsychologist 1992;3:276-86.
11. Berry DT, Allen RS, Schmitt FA. The Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure: Psychometric characteristics in a geriatric sample. Clin Neuropsychologist 1991;5:143-53.
12. Boone KB, Lesser IM, Hill-Gutierrez E, Berman NG, D'Elia LF. Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure performance in healthy, older adults: relationship to age, education, sex, and IQ. Clin Neuropsychologist 1993;7:22-8.
13. Strauss E. Spreen O. A comparison of the Rey and Taylor Figures. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1990;5:417-20.
14. Meyers JE, Meyers KR. Rey Complex Figure under four different administration procedures. Clin Neuropsychologist 1995;9:63-7.
15. Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, ed 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1992.
16. Glantz SA. Primer of biostatistics, ed 3. New York: McGraw Hill, 1992.
17. Siegel S. Non-parametric statistics. New York: McGraw Hill, 1956.