Urodynamically based modification of Mitrofanoff procedure

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 77-81

  Lorenzo, José L ^a,b   Castillo, Armando ^a   Serrano, Eduardo A ^a   González Blanco, Salomón ^a   Andrade, César ^a   Moreno, Jorge ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DE ESPECIALIDADES   (Mexico)

^b NONE   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS; APPENDIX; ARTICLE; BLADDER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MALE; MUSCLE HYPOTONIA; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; URETER; URETHRA STRICTURE; URINARY DIVERSION; URINE CULTURE; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 0030942263     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.1997.11.77     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adams MC, Mitchel ME, Rink R: Gastrocystoplasty: an alternative solution to the problem of urological reconstruction in the severely compromised patient. J Urol 1988;140:1152
2. Woodhouse C, Malone PR, Cumming J, Reilly TT: The Mitrofanoff principle for continent urinary diversion. Br J Urol 1989;63:53
3. Mitrofanoff P: Cystostomie continente trans-appendicularie dans le traitment de vessie neurologiques. Chir Pediatr 1980;21:297
4. Duckett JW, Snyder HM III: Continent urinary diversion: variations on the Mitrofanoff principle. J Urol 1986;136:58
5. Figueroa TE, Saborgal L, Helal M, Lockhart JL: The tapered and reimplanted small bowel as a variation of the Mitrofanoff procedure: preliminary results. J Urol 1994;152:73
6. Duckett JW, Lofti AH: Appendicovesicostomy (and variations) in bladder reconstruction. J Urol 1993;149:567
7. Woodhouse CRJ, Gordon EM: The Mitrofanoff principle for urethral failure. Br J Urol 1994;78:55
8. Cromie WJ, Barada JH, Weingarten JL: Cecal tubularization: lengthening technique for creation of catheterizable conduit. Urology 1991;37:41
9. Keating MA, Kropp BP, Adams MC, Patil UB, Rink RC: Seromuscular trough modification in construction of continent urinary stomas. J Urol 1993;150:734
10. Keetch DW, Brasler JW, Kavoussi LR, Catalona WJ: Modification of Mitrofanoff principle for continent urinary diversion. Urology 1993;41:507
11. Woodhouse C, MacNeil AE: The Mitrofanoff principle: expanding upon a versatile technique. Br J Urol 1994;74:447
12. Weingarten JL, Cromie WJ: The Mitrofanoff principle: an alternative form of continent urinary diversion. J Urol 1988;140:1529
13. Elder JS, Snyder HM, Hulbert VC, Duckett JW: Perforation of the augmented bladder in patients undergoing clean intermittent catheterization. J Urol 1988;140:1159
14. Leibovitch Y, Avigad I, Nativ O, Goldwasser B: The frequency of histopathological abnormalities in incidental appendectomy in urological patients: the implications for incorporation of the appendix in urinary tract reconstruction. J Urol 1992;148:41
15. Lapides J: Follow-up of abdominal neourethra. J Urol 1978; 119:219
16. Kropp KA, Angwafo FF: Urethral lengthening and reimplantation for neurogenic incontinence in children. J Urol 1986;135:553
17. Monfort G, Guys JM, Morrison L: Appendicovesicostomy: an alternative urinary diversion in the child. Eur Urol 1984;10:361
18. Sumfest JM, Burns MW, Mitchel ME: The Mitrofanoff principle in urinary reconstruction. J Urol 1993;150:1875
19. Borzi PA, Bruce J, Gough DCS: Continent cutaneous diversions in children: experience with the Mitrofanoff procedure. Br J Urol 1992;70:669
20. Jordan GH, Winslow BH: Laparoscopically assisted continent catheterizable cutaneous appendicovesicostomy. J Endourol 1993; 7:517