Evaluation of an electronic blood pressure device for epidemiologic studies

Blood Pressure Monitoring

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 35-40

  Cooper, Richard ^a   Puras, Angel ^b   Tracy, Julie ^a   Kaufman, Jay ^a   Asuzu, Michael ^c   Ordunez, Pedro ^d   Mufunda, Jacob ^e   Sparks, Harvey ^f  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE ALBACETE   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN   (Nigeria)

^d Gustavo Aldereguia Hospital   (Cuba)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ZIMBABWE   (Zimbabwe)

^f MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amiodarone; Ejection fraction; Myocardial infarction; Secondary prevention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RURAL AREA; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; URBAN AREA;

EID: 0030941604     PISSN: 13595237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Curb JD, Labarthe DR, Cooper SP, Cutter GR, Hawkins CM: Training and certification of blood pressure observers. Hypertension 1983, 5:610-614.
2. Wen SW, Kramer MS, Hoey J, Hanley JA, Usher RH: Terminal digit preference, random error, and bias in routine clinical measurement of blood pressure. J Clin Epidemiol 1993, 46:1187-1193.
3. Bruce NG, Shaper AG, Walker M, Wannamethee G: Observer bias in blood pressure studies. J Hypertens 1988, 6:375-380.
4. Canner PJ, Borhani NO, Oberman A, Cutler J, Prineas RJ, Langford H, Hooper FJ: The Hypertension Prevention Trial: assessment of the quality of blood pressure measurements. Am J Epidemiol 1991, 134:379-392.
5. Hense HW, Kuulasmaa K, Zaborskis A, Kupsc W, Tuomilehto J: Quality assessment of blood pressure measurements in epidemiological surveys. The Impact of last digit preference and the proportions of identical duplicate measurements. Rev Epidem et Sante Publ 1990, 38:463-468.
6. Hessel PA: Terminal digit preference in blood pressure measurements: effects on epidemiological associations. Int J Epidemiol 1986, 15:122-125.
7. Birkett NJ: Potential problems with the random zero sphygmomanometer. Hypertension 1994, 23:254-257.
8. National Center for Health Statistics: Blood pressure in persons 18-74 years of age in 1976-80, and trends in blood pressure from 1960 to 1980 in the United States. Vital and Health Statistics Series 11, No. 234. Washington, DC; Department of Human Services, Public Health Service 86-1684: 1966.
9. Burt VL, Cutler JA, Higgins M, et al.: Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in the adult US population. Data from the Health Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991. Hypertension 1995, 26:60-69.
10. Cooper R, Rotimi C, Ataman S, McGee D, Osotimehin B, Kadiri S, et al.: Hypertension prevalence in seven populations of African origin. Am J Public Health, 1997, in press.
11. Ataman SL, Cooper R, Rotimi C, McGee D, Osotimehin B, Kadiri S, et al.: Standardization of blood pressure measurement in an international comparative study. J Clin Epidemiol 1996, 49:869-877.
12. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N: An accurate automated device for home blood pressure measurement at last! The Omron HEM-706 CP [abstract]. J Hypertens 1994, 12:1317-1318.
13. Foster C, McKinlay JM, Cruickshank JM, Coats AJS: Accuracy of the Omron HEM 706 portable monitor for home measurement of blood pressure. J Hum Hypertens 1994, 8:661-664.
14. Walma EP, van Dooren C, van der Does E, Prins A, Mulder P, Hoes AW: Accuracy of an oscillometric automatic blood pressure device: the Omron HEM403C. J Hum Hypertens 1995, 9:169-174.
15. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, Thomas M: Evaluation of three devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705 CP, Phillips HP5332 and Nissei DS-175. Blood Press Monit 1996, 1:55-61.
16. Petrie J, O'Brien E, Littler W, de Swiet M: Recommendations on blood pressure measurement BMJ Clin Red Ed 1986, 293:611-615.
17. Bland JM, Altman DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1986, i:307-310.
18. Salaita K, Whelton PK, Seidler AJ: A community-based evaluation of the Vita-Stat Automatic Blood Pressure Recorder. Am J Hypertens 1990, 3:366-372.
19. Whincup PH, Bruce NG, Cook DG, Shaper AG: The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1992, 46:164-169.
20. Ramsey M: Blood pressure monitoring: automated oscillometric devices. J Clin Monit 1991, 7:56-67.
21. Pannarale G, Bebb G, Clark S, Sullivan A, Foster C, Coats AJS: Bias and variability in blood pressure measurement with ambulatory recorders. Hypertension 1993, 22:591-598.
22. Hasan MA, Thomas TA, Prys-Roberts C: Comparison of automatic oscillometric arterial pressure measurement with conventional auscultatory measurement in the labour ward. Br J Anaesth 1993, 70:141-144.
23. Bruce NG, Cook DG, Shaper AG: Differences between observers in blood pressure measurement with an automatic oscillometric recorder. J Hypertens 1990, 8 (suppl 4):S11-S13.
24. Ornstein S, Markert G, Litchfield L, Zemp L: Evaluation of the Dinamap blood pressure monitoring in an ambulatory blood primary care setting. J Family Practice 1988, 26:517-521.
25. Bottini PB, Carr AA, Prisant LM, Rhoades RB: Variability and similarity of manual office and automated blood pressures. J Clin Pharmacol 1992, 32:614-619.
26. Rose G: Standardization of observers in blood pressure measurements. Lancet 1965, i:673.
27. Kaufman JS, Owoaje EE, James SA, Rotimi C, Cooper RS: The determinants of hypertension in West Africa: contribution of anthropometric and dietary factors to urban-rural and socio-economic gradients. Am J Epidemiol 1996, 143:1203-1218.
28. De Gaudemaris R, Folsom AR, Prineas RJ, Luepker RV: The random-zero versus the standard mercury sphygmomanometer: a systematic blood pressure difference. Am J Epidemiol 1985, 121:282-290.
29. Conroy RM, O'Brien E, O'Malley K, Atkins N: Measurement error in the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer: what damage has been done and what can we learn? BMJ 1993, 306:1319-1322.
30. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, O'Malley K: Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet 1990, 336:1465-1468.
31. Hayler CR: 'Failure' of the random-zero sphygmomanometer in general practice. BMJ 1985, 291:137.
32. Fitzgerald D, O'Malley K, O'Brien ET: Inaccuracy of London School of Hygiene sphygmomanometer. BMJ 1982, 284:18-20.
33. Kronmal PR, Rutan GH, Borhani NO, Manolio TA, Furberg CD: Potential problems with the random zero sphygmomanometer. Lancet 1990, ii:255.
34. Evans JG, Prior IAM: Experience with the random zero-sphygmomanometer. Br J Prev Soc Med 1970, 24:10-15.
35. Labarthe DR, Hawkings CM, Remington RD: Evaluation of performance of selected devices for measuring blood pressure. Am J Cardiol 1973, 32:546-553.
36. Parker D, Liu K, Dyer AR, Giumetti D, Liao Y, Stamler J: A comparison of the random-zero and the standard mercury sphygmomanometers. Hypertension 1988, 11:269-271.
37. Kronmal RA, Rutan GH, Manolio TA, Borhani NO: Properties of the random zero sphygmomanometer. Hypertension 1993, 21:632-637