Evaluation of R-indices for preference testing of apple juices

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 241-246

  Cliff, M A ^a   King, M C ^a   Scaman, C ^b   Edwards, B J ^c  

^a AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c Sun Rype Products Ltd   (Canada)

Author keywords

Consumer testing; Preference testing; R index; Rating scales

Indexed keywords

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 0030938847     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(96)00056-0     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Basker, D. (1988) Critical values of differences among rank sums for multiple comparisons. Journal of Food Technology 42(2), 79-84.
2. Green, D. M. and Swets, J. A. (1966) Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. John Wiley, New York.
3. Hollander, M. and Wolfe, D. A. (1973) Nonparametric Statistical Methods. p. 151. Wiley, New York.
4. Horsfield, S. and Taylor, L. J. (1976) Exploring the relationship between sensory data and acceptability of meat. Journal of Science, Food and Agriculture 27, 1044-1056.
5. Ishii, R., Vie, A. and O'Mahony, M. (1992) Sensory difference testing: Ranking R-indices are greater than rating R-indices. Journal Sensory Studies 7, 57-61.
6. Kimmel, S. A., Sigman-Grant, M. and Guinard, J.-X. (1994) Sensory testing with young children. Journal of Food Technology 48(3), 92-99.
7. Meiselman, H. L. (1993) Critical evaluation of sensory techniques. Food Quality and Preference 4, 33-40.
8. Newell, G. J. and MacFarlane, J. D. (1987) Expanded tables for multiple comparison procedures in the analysis of ranked data. Journal of Food Science 52, 1721-1725.
9. O'Mahony, M., Kulp, J. and Wheeler, L. (1979) Sensory detection of off-flavors in milk incorporating short-cut signal detection measures. Journal of Dairy Science 62, 1857-1864.
10. O'Mahony, M., Buteau, L., Klapman-Baker, K., Stavros, I., Alford, A., Leonard, S. J., Heil, J. R. and Wolcott, T. K. Sensory evaluation of high vacuum flame sterilized clingstone peaches, using ranking and signal detection measures with minimal cross-sensory interference. Journal of Food Science 48, 1626-1631.
11. O'Mahony, M., Wong, S. Y. and Obbert, N. (1985) Sensory evaluation of navel oranges treated with low does of gamma-radiation. Journal of Food Science 50, 639-646.
12. O'Mahony, M. (1986). Sensory Evaluation of Food: Statistical Methods and Procedures. Marcel Dekker, New York.
13. O'Mahony, M. (1988). Sensory difference and preference testing: the use of signal detection measures. In Applied Sensory Analysis of Foods, ed. H. Moskowitz; pp. 145-175; CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida..
14. O'Mahony, M. (1992) Understanding discrimination tests: A user-friendly treatment of response bias, rating and ranking r-index tests and their relationship to signal detection. Journal Sensory Studies 1, 1-47.
15. Pearce, J. H., Korth, B. and Warren, C. B. (1986) Evaluation of three scaling methods for hedonics. Journal Sensory Studies 1, 27-46.
16. Shepherd, R., Griffiths, N. M. and Smith, K. (1988) The relationship between consumer preferences and trained panel responses. Journal Sensory Studies 3, 19-35.
17. Swanson, R. B. and Lewis, C. E. (1992) Premium honeys: Response of sensory panellists. Food Quality and Preference, 3, 215-221.
18. Vie, A., Gulli, D. and O'Mahony, M. (1991) Alternative hedonic measures. Journal Food Science 56(1), 1-46.