In vivo comparison of electrosurgical vaporization electrodes

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 83-87

  Wolf Jr , J Stuart ^a,b   Rayala, Heidi J ^a   Humphrey, Peter A ^a   Clayman, Ralph V ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SORBITOL;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLADDER EPITHELIUM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROCOAGULATION; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; GENERATOR; LAVAGE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; VAPORIZATION;

EID: 0030938822     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.1997.11.83     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Bush IM, Garlovsky IS, Quint R, et al: The evolution of transurethral vaporization of the prostate (TUV): a 120 year history of progress (abstract 539). J Urol 1996;155:445A
2. Kaplan SA, Te AE: Transurethral electrovaporization of the prostate: a novel method for treating men with benign proslatic hyperplasia. Urology 1995;45:566-572
3. Nakada SY, dayman RV: Percutaneous electrovaporization of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma in patients with functionally solitary kidneys. Urology 1995;46:751-755
4. Perlmutter AP, Muschter R, Razvi HA: Electrosurgical vaporization of the prostate in the canine model. Urology 1995;46:518-523
5. Reis RR, Cologna AJ, Suaid HJ, et al: Electrovaporization of the prostate (VAP): a comparison of roller electrode configurations for resecting prostate tissue (abstract 382). J Urol 1996;155:406A
6. Narayan P, Tewari A, Croker B, et al: Factors affecting size and configuration of electrovaporization lesions in the prostate. Urology 1996;47:679-688