Vaginal pudendal nerve stimulation: A new technique for assessment of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 294-299

  Tetzschner, Tine ^a   Sørensen, Michael ^a   Lose, Gunnar ^a   Christiansen, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Pudendal nerve; Reproducibility; Vaginal stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FECES INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LATENT PERIOD; PELVIS FLOOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUDENDAL NERVE; REPRODUCIBILITY; VAGINA;

EID: 0030938139     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.1997.tb07981.x     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Keighley MRB. Anatomy and physiology. In: Keighley MRB, Williams NS, eds. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. London: Saunders, 1993; 1-17.
2. Kiff ES, Swash M. Slowed conduction in the pudendal nerves in idiopathic (neurogenic) faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 1984; 71: 614-6.
3. Smith ARB, Hosker GL, Warrell DW. The role of pudendal nerve damage in aetiology of genuine stress incontinence in women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 29-32.
4. Tetzschner T, Sørensen M, Lose G, Christiansen J. Pudendal nerve damage increases the risk of faecal incontinence in women with anal sphincter rupture after childbirth. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1995; 74: 434-40.
5. Ganong WF. Physiology of nerve and muscle cells. In: Ganong WF, ed. Review of medical physiology. Los Altos: Lange Medical Publications, 1979; 21-34.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 307-10.
7. Murray GD, Miller R. Statistical comparison of two methods of clinical measurement. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 384-7.