Comparison of clinical complications, angiographic results, and device usage of coronary angioplasty using low- and high-compliance balloons

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 5-11

  Desmet, Walter J ^a   De Scheerder, Ivan K ^a   Barrios, Laurentino ^a   Piessens, Jan H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

balloon compliance; complications; coronary angioplasty; quantitative coronary analysis

Indexed keywords

ANTIANGINA PECTORIS AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CALCIUM ANTAGONIST; NITRATE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY DILATATION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0030937505     PISSN: 00986569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0304(199705)41:1<5::AID-CCD3>3.0.CO;2-C     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Berry KJ, Drew TM, McKendall GR, Sharaf BL, Thomas ES, Williams DO: Balloon material as a risk factor for coronary angioplasty: Procedural complications. Circulation 84:II-130 (abstract), 1991.
2. Bach RG, Kern MJ, Donohue TJ, Aguirre FV, Bell C, Penick D: Comparison of compliant and noncompliant balloons on the outcomes of coronary angioplasty. Cath Cardiovasc Diagn 26:73 (abstract), 1992.
3. Mooney MR, Mooney JF, Longe TF, Brandenburg RO: Effect of balloon material on coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 69:1481-1482, 1992.
4. Ellis SG, Topol EJ: Results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of high-risk angulated stenoses. Am J Cardiol 66:932-937, 1990.
5. Gerber TL, Anwar A, Pritchard GL, Murdock BE, Solis RM, Donsky MS: Does balloon material affect the rate of dissection in coronary angioplasty? Circulation 88:I-587 (abstract), 1993.
6. Sharma SK, Israel DH, Kamean JL, Bodian CA, Ambrose JA: Clinical, angiographic, and procedural determinants of major and minor coronary dissection during angioplasty. Am Heart J 126:39-47, 1993.
7. Barth K, Eicker B, Bittner U, Marhoff P: The improvement of vessel quantification with image processing equipment for high resolution digital angiography. In Lemke HV (ed): "Computer Assisted Radiology." Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1989, pp 220-225.
8. Desmet W, Willems JL, Vrolix M, Van Lierde J, Byttebier G, Piessens J: Intra- and interobserver variability of a fast on-line quantitative coronary angiographic system. Int J Card Imaging 9:249-256, 1993.
9. Fortin DF, Spero LA, Cusma JT, Santoro L, Burgess R, Bashore TM: Pitfalls in the determination of absolute dimensions using angiographie catheters as calibration devices in quantitative angiography. Am J Cardiol 68:1176-1182, 1991.
10. Raymenants E, Bhandari S, Desmet W, De Scheerder I, Reniers R, Willems JL, Piessens JH: The impact of balloon material and lesion characteristics on the incidence of angiographic and clinical complications of coronary angioplasty. Cath Cardiovasc Diagn 32:303-309, 1994.
11. Safian RD, Hoffman MA, Almany S, Kahn J, Reddy V, Marsalese D, Gangadharan V, Ajluni S, Friedman HZ, Schreiber TL, Grines CL, O'Neill WW: Comparison of coronary angioplasty with compliant and noncompliant balloons (The angioplasty compliance trial). Am J Cardiol 76:518-520, 1995.
12. Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM, Kennedy JW, King SB III, Loop FD, Peterson KL, Reeves TJ, Williams DO, Winters WL, Fisch C, DeSanctis RW, Dodge HT, Reeves J, Weinberg SL: Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: A report from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation 78:486-502, 1988.
13. Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, DiSciascio G, Deligonul U, Topol EJ, Bulle TM, and the Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group: Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease: Implications for patient selection. Circulation 82:1193-1202, 1990.