P50 event-related brain potential amplitude and suppression measurements recorded with subjects seated versus supine

Biological Psychiatry

Volumn 41, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 902-905

  McCallin, Keith ^a,b   Cardenas, Valerie A ^a,b   Fein, George ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SAN FRANCISCO VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory evoked potentials; Auditory P50; Electroencephalography; Middle latency auditory evoked potentials; Myoclonus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; EVOKED RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030936911     PISSN: 00063223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(97)00545-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adler LE, Gerhardt GA, Franks R, et al (1990a): Sensory physiology and catecholamines in schizophrenia and mania. Psychiatry Res 31:297-309.
2. Adler LE, Waldo MC, Tatcher A, Cawthra E, Baker N, Freedman R (1990b): Lack of relationship of auditory gating defects to negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 3:131-138.
3. Adler LE, Hoffer LJ, Griffith J, Waldo MC, Freedman R (1992): Normalization by nicotine of deficient auditory sensory gating in the relatives of schizophrenics. Biol Psychiatry 32:607.
4. Adler LE, Hoffer L, Nagamoto HT, Waldo MC, Kisley MA, Griffith JM (1994): Yohimbine impairs P50 auditory sensory gating in normal subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology 10: 249-257.
5. Baker NJ, Staunton M, Adler LE, et al (1990): Sensory gating deficits in psychiatric inpatients: Relation to catecholamine metabolites in different diagnostic groups. Biol Psychiatry 27:519-528.
6. Bickford R, Jacobson J, Thane D, Cody, R (1964): Nature of average evoked potentials to sound and other stimuli in man. Ann NY Acad Sci 112:204-223.
7. Boutros NN, Overall J, Zouridakis B (1991): Test-retest reliability of the P50 mid-latency auditory evoked response. Psychiatry Res 29:181-192.
8. Buchwald JS, Erwin R, Van Lancker D, Guthrie D, Schwafel J, Tanguay P (1992): Midlatency auditory evoked responses: P1 abnormalities in adult autistic subjects. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 84:164-171.
9. Cardenas VA, Gerson J, Fein G (1993): The reliability of P50 suppression as measured by the conditioning/testing ratio is vastly improved by dipole modeling. Biol Psychiatry 33:335-344.
10. Cardenas VA, Yingling CD, Jewett D, Fein G (1995): A Multichannel model-free method for estimation of event-related potential amplitudes and its comparison to dipole source localization. J Med Eng Technol 19:88-98.
11. Davis H, Mast T, Yoshie M, Zerlin S (1966): The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: Recovery process. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 21:105-113.
12. Deiber MP, Ibañez V, Fischer C, Perrin F, Mauguière F (1988): Sequential mapping favours the hypothesis of distinct generators for Na and Pa middle latency auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 71:187-197.
13. Erwin RJ, Buchwald JS (1986): Midlatency auditory evoked responses: Differential recovery cycle characteristics. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 64:417-423.
14. Fein G, Biggins C, VanDyke C (1994): The auditory P50 response is normal in Alzheimer's disease when measured via a paired click paradigm. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92:536-545.
15. ein G, Biggins C, MacKay S (1996): Cocaine abusers have reduced auditory P50 amplitude and suppression compared to both normal controls and alcoholics. Biol Psychiatry 39:955-965.
16. Freedman R, Adler LE, Waldo M (1987): Gating of the auditory evoked potential in children and adults. Psychophysiology 24:223-227.
17. Fruhstorfer H, Soveri P, Jarvilehto T (1970): Short-term habituation of auditory evoked response in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 28:153-161.
18. Harker LA, Hogich E, Voots R, Mendel M (1977): Influence of succinylcholine on middle component auditory evoked potentials. Arch Otolaryngol 103:133-137.
19. Jerger K, Biggins C, Fein G (1992): P50 suppression is not affected by attentional manipulation. Biol Psychiatry 31:365-377.
20. Kathmann N, Engel RR (1990): Sensory gating in normals and schizophrenics: A failure to find strong P50 suppression in normals. Biol Psychiatry 27:1216-1226.
21. Kraus N, Özdamar Ö, Hier D, Stein L (1982): Auditory middle latency responses (MLRs) in patients with cortical lesions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54:275-287.
22. Liégeois-Chauvel C, Musolino A, Badier JM, Marquis P, Chauvel P (1994): Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: Evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92:204-214.
23. Mendel MI, Hosick EC (1975): Effects of secobarbital on the early components of the auditory evoked potentials. Rev Laryngol 96:178-184.
24. Nagamoto HT, Adler LE, Waldo MC, Freedman R (1989): Sensory gating in schizophrenics and normal controls: Effects of changing stimulation interval. Biol Psychiatry 25:549-561.
25. Nagamoto HT, Adler LE, Waldo MC, Griffith J, Freedman R (1991): Gating of auditory response in schizophrenics and normal controls. Effects of recording site and stimulation interval on the P50 wave. Schizophr Res 4:31-40.
26. Robinson K, Rudge P (1982): Centrally generated evoked potentials. In Halliday AM (ed), Evoked Potentials in Clinical Testing. London: Churchill Livingstone, pp 368-372.
27. Schwarzkopf SB, Lamberti JS, Smith DA (1993): Concurrent assessment of acoustic startle and auditory P50 evoked potential measures of sensory inhibition. Biol Psychiatry 33:815-828.
28. Waldo MC, Freedman R (1986): Gating of auditory evoked responses in normal college students. Psychiatry Res 19:223-239.
29. Zouridakis G, Boutros NN (1992): Stimulus parameter effects on the P50 evoked response. Biol Psychiatry 32:839-841.