Identifying new health care technologies in the United Kingdom

International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 59-67

  Stevens, Andrew ^a   Robert, Glenn ^a   Gabbay, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; TECHNOLOGY; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0030930901     PISSN: 02664623     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0266462300010230     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Improving America's health through health service research. Bethesda, MD: U.S Department of Health and Human Services, 1991.
2. Canadian Co-ordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment. An international inventory of health care technology assessment reports and projects, 1st ed. Ottawa: CCHOTA, 1992.
3. Canadian Co-ordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment. Directory of health technology assessment projects in Canada, 3rd ed. Ottawa: CCHOTA, 1994.
4. Comroe J. H. & Dripps R. D. Scientific basis for the support of biomedical science. Science, 1976, 192, 105-11.
5. ECRI. Health technology forecast 1995. Plymouth Meeting, PA: ECRI, 1995.
6. Freiman F. P. The rate of adoption of new procedures among physicians. Medical Care 1985, 23, 939-45.
7. Hadridge, P., & Hodgson, T. The Hemingford Scenario: Alternative futures for health and health care. Oxford: Oxford and Anglia Regional Health Authority, 1994.
8. Huerta, J. A. The role of technology in rising healthcare costs. Journal of Clinical Engineering 1995, 20, 48-56.
9. Institute of Public Health. Cambridge health futures: Role and contribution. Cambridge: Institute of Public Health, 1994.
10. Kahane, A. Global scenarios for the energy industry: Challenge and response. London: Shell International Petroleum Co. Ltd, 1991.
11. Lara, M. E., & Goodman, C. (eds.). National priorities for the assessment of clinical conditions and medical technologies: Report of a pilot study. Washington, DC: Council on Health Care Technology, Institute of Medicine, 1990.
12. Leufkens, H., Haajar-Ruskamp, F., Bakkar, A. & Dukes, G. Scenario analysis of the future of medication. British Medical Journal, 1994, 309, 1137-40.
13. Lewit, E. M. The diffusion of surgical technology: Who's on first? Journal of Health Economics 1986, 5, 99-102.