Gatekeeping and assisted reproductive technology. The ethical rights and responsibilities of doctors

Medical Journal of Australia

Volumn 167, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 318-320

  Pearn, John H ^a  

^a Royal Children's Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GAMETE INTRAFALLOPIAN TRANSFER; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LESBIAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL ETHICS; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0030929199     PISSN: 0025729X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb125078.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (3)

1. Ward H. Lessons from a symposium on ethical and economic conflicts in a changing health service held in the College on 1 February 1996. Proc R Coll Physicians Edin 1996; 26: 594-597.
2. Englert Y, van den Bergh M, Rodesch C, et al. Nouveau programme de fecondation in vitro à L'hôpital Erasme: Premiers resultals et aspects ethiques originaux. Rev Med Brux 1991; 12: 305-314.
3. Kovacs GT. The likelihood of pregnancy with IVF and GIFT in Australia and New Zealand. Med J Aust 1993; 158: 805-807.