Learning-induced receptive field plasticity in the primary auditory cortex

Seminars in the Neurosciences

Volumn 9, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 59-67

  Weinberger, Norman M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cholinergic; Cortex memory; Plasticity; Potentiation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AUDITORY CORTEX; CHOLINERGIC SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOREBRAIN; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; LEARNING; MEMORY; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; RECEPTIVE FIELD; REVIEW; SENSORY CORTEX; SENSORY STIMULATION;

EID: 0030929116     PISSN: 10445765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/smns.1997.0106     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Weinberger N. M. Retuning the brain by fear conditioning. The Cognitive Neurosciences. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge. p. 1071-1089.
2. Weinberger N. M. Dynamic regulation of receptive fields and maps in the adult sensory cortex. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18:1995;129-158.
3. Boring E. G. A History of Experimental Psychology. 1957;Appleton-Century-Crofts, NY.
4. Gibson E. J. Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development. 1969;Appleton-Century-Crofts, NY.
5. Wiesel T. N., Hubel D. H. Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J. Neurophysiol. 26:1963;1003-1017.
6. Chino Y. M. Receptive field properties of neurons in reorganized visual cortex. Semin. Neurosci. 9:1997.
7. Mackintosh N. J. Conditioning and Associative Learning. 1983;Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
8. Rescorla R. A. Behavioral studies of Pavlovian conditioning. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 11:1988;329-352.
9. Lennartz R. C., Weinberger N. M. Analysis of response systems in Pavlovian conditioning reveals rapidly vs slowly acquired conditioned responses: Support for two factors and implications for neurobiology. Psychobiology. 20:1992;93-119.
10. Kehoe E. J., Macrae M. Classical conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response can be fast or slow: Implications for Lennartz and Weinberger's (1992) two-factor theory. Psychobiology. 22:1994;1-4.
11. Lennartz R. C., Weinberger N. M. A comparison of nonspecific and nictitation membrane conditioned responses: Additional support for two-factor theories. Psychobiology. 22:1994;5-15.
12. Weinberger N. M., Diamond D. M. Physiological plasticity of single neurons in auditory cortex: Rapid induction by learning. Progr. Neurobiol. 29:1987;1-55.
13. Bakin J. S., Weinberger N. M. Classical conditioning induces CS-specific receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig. Brain Res. 536:1990;271-286.
14. Diamond D. M., Weinberger N. M. Classical conditioning rapidly induces specific changes in frequency receptive fields of single neurons in secondary and ventral ectosylvian auditory cortical fields. Brain Res. 372:1986;357-360.
15. Bakin J. S., Lepan B., Weinberger N. M. Sensitization induced receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex is independent of CS-modality. Brain Res. 577:1992;226-235.
16. Condon C. D., Weinberger N. M. Habituation produces frequency-specific plasticity of receptive fields in the auditory cortex. Behav. Neurosci. 105:1991;416-430.
17. Edeline J.-M., Weinberger N. M. Receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex during frequency discrimination training: Selective retuning independent of task difficulty. Behav. Neurosci. 107:1993;82-103.
18. Edeline J.-M., Pham P., Weinberger N. M. Rapid development of learning-induced receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex. Behav. Neurosci. 107:1993;539-557.
19. Weinberger N. M., Javid R., Lepan B. Long-term retention of learning-induced receptive-field plasticity in the auditory cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:1993;2394-2398.
20. Bakin J. S., South D. A., Weinberger N. M. Induction of receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex of the guinea pig during instrumental avoidance conditioning. Behav. Neurosci. 110:1996;905-913.
21. Diamond D. M., Weinberger N. M. The role of context in the expression of learning-induced plasticity of single neurons in auditory cortex. Behav. Neurosci. 103:1989;471-494.
22. Ohl W. F., Scheich H. Differential frequency conditioning enhances spectral contrast sensitivity of units in auditory cortex (field A1) of the alert mongolian gerbil. Eur. J. Neurosci. 8:1996;1001-1017.
23. Weinberger N. M., Ashe J. H., Diamond D. M., Metherate R., McKenna T. M., Bakin J. Retuning auditory cortex by learning: A preliminary model of receptive field plasticity. Concepts Neurosci. 1:1990;91-132.
24. Recanzone G. H., Schreiner C. E., Merzenich M. M. Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. J. Neurosci. 13:1993;87-103.
25. Gonzalez-Lima F., Scheich H. Neural substrates for tone-conditioned bradycardia demonstration with 2 deoxyglucose II. Auditory cortex plasticity. Behav. Brain Res. 20:1986;281-293.
26. Carrascal E., Arevalo M., Fraiminan A., Ortin A. A study with 2-(sup-1-sup-4C) deoxyglucose of cerebral structures of the rat during the egvocation of cognitive maps in a complex maze by acoustic stimulation. New Trends Exp. Clin. Psychol. 7:1991;93-100.
27. Molchan S. E., Sunderland T., McIntosh A. R., Herscovitch P., Schreurs B. G. A functional anatomical study of associative learning in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;8122-8126.
28. Sakurai Y. Involvement of auditory cortical and hippocampal neurons in auditory working memory and reference memory in the rat. J. Neurosci. 14:1994;2606-2623.
29. Johnston M. V., McKinney M., Coyle J. T. Evidence for a cholinergic projection to neocortex from neurons in the basal forebrain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 76:1979;5392-5396.
30. Hartgraves S. L., Mensah P. L., Kelly P. H. Regional decreases of cortical choline acetyltransferase after lesions of the septal area and in the area of nucleus basalis magnocellularis. Neuroscience. 7:1982;2369-2376.
31. Mesulam M.-M., Mufson E. J., Levey A. I., Wainer B. H. Cholinergic innervation of cortex by the basal forebrain: Cytochemistry and cortical connections of the septal area, diagonal band nuclei, nucleus basalis (substantia innominata), and hypothalamus in the rhesus monkey. J. Comp. Neurol. 214:1983;170-197.
32. McKenna T. M., Ashe J. H., Weinberger N. M. Cholinergic modulation of frequency receptive fields in auditory cortex. I. Frequency-specific effects of muscarinic agonists. Synapse. 4:1989;30-43.
33. Ashe J. H., McKenna T. M., Weinberger N. M. Cholinergic modulation of frequency receptive fields in auditory cortex. II. Frequency-specific effects of anticholinesterases provide evidence for a modulatory action of endogenous ACh. Synapse. 4:1989;44-54.
34. Hars B., Maho C., Edeline J-M., Hennevin E. Basal forebrain stimulation facilitates tone-evoked responses in the auditory cortex of awake rat. Neuroscience. 56:1993;61-74.
35. Edeline J-M., Hars B., Maho C., Hennevin E. Transient and prolonged facilitation of tone-evoked responses induced by basal forebrain stimulation in the rat auditory cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 96:1994;373-386.
36. Edeline J-M., Maho C., Hars B., Hennevin E. Non-awaking basal forebrain stimulation enhances auditory cortex responsiveness during slow-wave sleep. Brain Res. 636:1994;333-337.
37. Metherate R., Ashe J. H. Basal forebrain stimulation modifies auditory cortex responsiveness by an action at muscarinic receptors. Brain Res. 559:1991;163-167.
38. Metherate R., Ashe J. H. Nucleus basalis stimulation facilitates thalamocortical synaptic transmission in the rat auditory cortex. Synapse. 14:1993;132-143.
39. Metherate R., Weinberger N. M. Cholinergic modulation of responses to single tones produces tone-specific receptive field alterations in cat auditory cortex. Synapse. 6:1990;133-145.
40. Whalen P. J., Kapp B. S., Pascoe J. P. Neuronal activity within the nucleus basalis and conditioned neocortical electroencephalographic activation. J. Neurosci. 14:1994;1623-1633.
41. Maho C., Hars B., Edeline J-M., Hennevin E. Conditioned changes in the basal forebrain: Relations with learning-induced cortical plasticity. Psychobiology. 23:1995;10-25.
42. Bakin J. S., Weinberger N. M. Induction of a physiological memory in the cerebral cortex by stimulation of the nucleus basalis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:1996;11219-11224.