Digital chest imaging using a selenium detector: The impact of hard copy size on observer performance: a computed tomography-controlled study

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 363-367

  Van Heesewijk, Hans P M ^a   Van der Graaf, Yolanda ^b   De Valois, Johannis C ^a   Vos, Jan Albert ^b   Feldberg, Michiel A M ^b  

^a ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

comparative studies radiography; digital; Lung; radiography; thorax

Indexed keywords

SELENIUM;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SIGNAL DETECTION; THORAX RADIOGRAPHY;

EID: 0030926107     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199706000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. van Heesewijk JPM, de Valois JC. Clinical evaluation of a new digital chest imaging system. Eur Radiol 1995;5:83-87.
2. Chotas HG, Floyd Jr CE, Ravin CE. Technical evaluation of a digital chest radiography system that uses a selenium detector. Radiology 1995;195:264-270.
3. Neitzel U, Maack I, Günther-Kohfahl S. Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector. Med Phys 1994;21:509-516.
4. van Heesewijk HPM, Neitzel U, van der Graaf Y, de Valois JC, Feldberg MAM. Digital chest imaging using a selenium detector: Comparison with conventional radiography for visualization of specific anatomic regions of the chest. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:535-540.
5. van Heesewijk HPM, van der Graaf Y, de Valois JC, Feldberg MAM. Digital chest imaging using a selenium detector: A simulated diffuse interstitial pulmonary disease detection study. Invest Radiol 1995;5:300-305.
6. Floyd CE, Baker JA, Chotas HG, Ravin C. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: Radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165:1353-1358.
7. van Heesewijk JPM, van der Graaf Y, Vos JA, de Valois JC, Feldberg MAM. Digital chest imaging using a selenium detector versus conventional film radiography: A CT-controlled study. Radiology 1996; 200:687-690.
8. Schaefer CM, Prokop M, Oestmann JW, et al. Impact of hardcopy size on observer performance in digital chest radiography. Radiology 1992;184:77-81.
9. Schaefer CM, Greene R, Oestmann JE, et al, Digital storage phosphor imaging versus conventional film radiography in CT-documented chest disease. Radiology 1990: 174:207-210.
10. Neitzel U. Grids or air gaps for scatter reduction in digital radiography: A model calculation. Med Phys 1992;19:475-481.
11. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24:234-245.
12. Glazer HS, Muka E, Sagel SS, Jost RG. New techniques in chest radiography. Radiol Clin North Am 1994;32:711-729.
13. de Valois JC, van Heesewijk HPM. Economic aspects and cost calculations for a digital selenium- based chest imaging system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:950-952.
14. Sagel SS, Jost RG, Glazer, et al. Digital mobile radiography. J Thorac Imaging 1990;5:36-48.