Early speech results with the Provox prosthesis after laryngectomy

Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 123, Issue 9, 1997, Pages 966-968

  Aust, Michelle R ^a   McCaffrey, Thomas V ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX PROSTHESIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPEECH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0030924042     PISSN: 08864470     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1997.01900090080011     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Singer Ml, Blom ED. An endoscopie technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol. 1980:89:529-533.
2. Kesteloot K, Nolis I, Huygh J, Delaere P, Feenstra L Costs and effects of tracheoesophageal speech compared with esophageal speech in laryngectomy patients. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1994;48:387-394.
3. Quer M.Burgues-VilaJ.Garcia-Crespillo P. Primary tracheoesophageal puncture vs esophageal speech. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:188-190.
4. Panje WR. Prosthetic voice rehabilitation following laryngectomy: the voice button. Ann Otol. 1981 ;90:116-120.
5. Nijdam HF, Annyas AA, Schutte HK, Leever H. A new prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy. Arch Otorhlnolaryngol. 1982:237:27-33.
6. Izdebski K, Reed CG, Ross JC, Hilsinger RL Problems with tracheoesophageal fistula voice restoration in totally laryngectomized patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:840-845.
7. Garth RJH, McRae A, Rhys-Evans PH. Tracheoesophageal puncture: a review of problems and complications. J Laryngol Otol. 1991:105:750-754.
8. Hilgers FJM, Schouwenburg PF. A new low-resistance, self-retaining prosthesis (Provox3) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope. 1990; 100:1202-1207.
9. Van Weissenbruch R, Albers FWJ. Vocal rehabilitation after total laryngectomy using the Provox™ voice prosthesis. Clin Otolaryngol. 1993:18:359-364.
10. Callanan V, Gurr P, Baldwin D, White-Thompson M, Beckinsale J, Bennett J. Provox™ valve use for post-laryngectomy voice rehabilitation. J Laryngol Otol. 1995; 109:1068-1071.
11. Kao WW, Mohr RM, Kimmer CA, Getch C, Silverman C. The outcome and techniques of primary and secondary tracheoesophageal puncture. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120:301 -307.
12. Hilgers FJM, Cornelissen MW, Balm AJM. Aerodynamic characteristics of the Provox™ low-resistance indwelling voice prosthesis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngot. 1993:250:375-378.
13. Heaton JM, Parker AJ. In vitro comparison of the Groningen high resistance, Groningen low resistance and Provoxs speaking valves. J Laryngol Otol 1994;108:321-324.
14. Natarajan B, Richardson MD, Irvine BWH, Thomas M.The Provox™ voice prosthesis and Candida albicans growth: a preliminary report of clinical, mycological and scanning electron microscopic assessment. J Laryngol Otol. 1994;108:666-668.