Efficacy of a dating violence prevention program on attitudes justifying aggression

Journal of Adolescent Health

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 11-17

  Avery Leaf, Sarah ^a   Cascardi, M ^a   O'Leary, K D ^a   Cano, A ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Attitude change; Curriculum evaluation; Dating violence; Prevention program

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTIMACY; MALE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF REPORT; VIOLENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; AGGRESSION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COURTSHIP; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; JEALOUSY; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEW YORK; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RATIONALIZATION; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIOLENCE;

EID: 0030920741     PISSN: 1054139X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1054-139X(96)00309-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bergman L. Dating violence among high school students. Social Work 1992;37:21-27.
2. Pederson P, Thomas CD. Prevalence and correlates of dating violence in a Canadian university sample. Can J Behrav Sci 1992;24:490-501.
3. Henton JM, Cate RM, Koval J, et al. Romance and violence in dating relationships. J Fam Issues 1983;4:467-82.
4. O'Keefe NK, Brockopp K, Chew E. Teen dating violence. Social Work 1986;Nov-Dec:463-8.
5. Reuterman NA, Burcky WD. Dating violence in high school: A profile of the victims. Psychology 1989;26:1-9.
6. Smith JP, Williams JG. From abusive household to dating violence. J Fam Violence 1992;7:153-65.
7. Roscoe B, Callahan JE. Adolescent's self report of violence in families and dating relationships. Adolescence 1983;10:545-53.
8. Avery-Leaf S, Cascardi M, O'Leary KD. Efficacy of a dating violence prevention program. Poster presented at the 102nd annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, August 1994, Los Angeles, CA.
9. Dickinson G. Dating behavior of black and white adolescents before and after desegregation. J Marriage Fam 1975;37:602-8.
10. Jones LE. School Curriculum Project Evaluation Report. Minnesota Coalition for Battered Women, Duluth, MN, 1987.
11. Kaufman Kantor G, Jasinski J. Prevention of dating violence: evaluation of a multidimensional model. Paper presented at the 4th International Family Violence Research Conference, July 21-24, 1995, Durham, NH.
12. Jaffe PG, Sudermann M, Reitzel D, et al. An evaluation of a secondary school primary prevention program on violence in intimate relationships. Violence Victims 1992;7:129-46.
13. Lavoie F, Vezina L, Piche C, Boivin M. Evaluation of a prevention program for violence in teen dating relationships. J Interpersonal Violence 1995;10:516-24.
14. Levy B. Skills for Violence-Free Relationships. Southern California Coalition on Battered Women, Santa Monica, CA, 1984.
15. Arias I, Samios M, O'Leary KD. Prevalence and correlates of physical aggression during courtship. J Interpersonal Violence 1987;2:82-90.
16. Riggs DS, O'Leary KD. A theoretical model of courtship aggression. In: Pirog-Good MA, Stets JE, editors. Violence in Dating Relationships: Emerging Social Issues. New York, NY: Praeger, 1989:53-71.
17. Riggs DS, O'Leary KD. Aggression between dating partners: An explanation of a causal model of courtship aggression. J Interpersonal Violence. 1996;11:519-40.
18. Bird GW, Stith SM, Schladale J. Psychological resources, coping strategies, and negotiation styles as discriminators of violence in dating relationships. Fam Relat 1991;40:45-50.
19. Cano A, Avery-Leaf S, Cascardi M, O'Leary KD. Correlates of dating violence in a high school sample. Paper presented at the 4th International Family Violence Research Conference, Durham, NH, 1995.
20. Dobash RE, Dobash RP. Violence against wives: A case against patriarchy. New York, NY: Free Press, 1979.
21. Yllo K. Through a feminist lens. In: Gelles RJ, Loseke DR, editors. Current Controversies in Family Violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993.
22. Dutton DG (1994). Patriarchy and wife assault: The ecological fallacy. Violence Victims 1994;9:167-82.
23. O'Leary KD, Barling J, Arias I, et al. Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses. J Consult Clin Psychol 1989;57:263-8.
24. Makepeace JM. Gender differences in courtship violence victimization. Fam Rel 1986;35:383-8.
25. Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. J Marriage Fam 1979;41:75-86.
26. Pan HS, Neidig PH, O'Leary KD. Male-female and aggressor-victim differences in the factor structure of the Modified Conflict Tactics scale. J Interpersonal Violence 1994;9:366-82.
27. Caulfield MB, Riggs DS. The assessment of dating aggression: Empirical evaluation of the conflict tactics scales. J Interpersonal Violence 1992;7:549-58.
28. Crowne DP, Marlowe D. The approval motive: studies in evaluation dependence. New York: Wiley, 1964.
29. Greenwald HJ, Satow Y. A short social desirability scale. Psychol Rep 1970;27:131-5.
30. Fagan J. The criminalization of domestic violence: Promises and limits. Natl Inst Justice 1996; Jan, pp 1-64.
31. Administration of Children and Families. Youth Education and Domestic Violence Model Programs. Fed Reg 1996;61: 30621-2.
32. Cascardi M, Avery-Leaf S, O'Leary KD. Building a gender-sensitive model to explain male and female use of dating violence: Preliminary results. Poster presented at the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, CA, 1994.
33. Foo L, Margolin G. A multivariate investigation of dating aggression. J Fam Violence 1995;10:351-77.