Association of visual field, cup-disc ratio, and magnetic resonance imaging of optic chiasm

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 115, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 729-732

  Iwata, Fumino ^a,b   Patronas, Nicholas J ^a   Caniso, Rafael C ^a   Podgor, Marvin J ^a   Remaley, Nancy A ^a   Kupfer, Carl ^a   Kaiser Kupfer, Muriel L ^a  

^a NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ABNORMALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTIC CHIASM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

EID: 0030920188     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150731006     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Damms T, Dannheim F. Sensitivity and specificity of optic disc parameters in chronic glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993:34:2246-2250.
2. Montgomery DM, Craig JP. Optic disc interpretation in glaucoma: is confidence misplaced? Ophthalmol Physiol Opt. 1993;13:383-386.
3. Abrams US, Scott IU, Spaeth GL, Quigley HA, Varma R. Agreement among optometrists, ophthalmologists, and residents in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1662-1667.
4. lester M, Traverso CE, Rolando M, Calabria G, Zingirian M. Study of the correlation between average values of optic disc parameters and their measurement variability using stereovideographic digital analysis. Ophthalmologica. 1995; 209:177-181.
5. Bartz-Schmidt KU, Sundigen M, Widder RA, Wever J, Krieglstein GK. Limits of two-dimensional planimetry in the follow-up of glaucomatous optic discs. Graets Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995:233:284-290.
6. Nicolela MT, Drance SM. Various glaucomatous optic nerve appearances: clinical correlations. Ophthalmology. 1996:103:640-649.
7. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study Investigators. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study, II: visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994:101:1445-1455.
8. Leske MC, Connell AMS, Schachat AP, Hyman L, the Barbados Eye Study Group. The Barbados Eye Study: prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994:112:821-829.
9. Winer BJ, Brown DR, Michels KM. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co; 1991.
10. Dixon WJ, ed. BMDP Statistical Software Manual: To Accompany the 7.0 Software Release. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1992.
11. Agresti A. Categorical Data Analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1990.
12. Gass A, Barker GJ, MacManus D, et al. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior visual pathway in patients with optic neuropathies using fast spin echo and phased array local coils. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995:58:562-569.
13. Imamura Y, Mashima Y, Oshitari K, Oguchi Y, Momoshima S, Shiga H. Detection of dilated subarachnoid space around the optic nerve in patients with papilloedema using T2 weighted fast spin echo imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996:60:108-109.
14. Tanino T, Mashima Y, Harashima N, Oshitari K, Oguchi Y. T2-weighted fastspin echo MRI in patients v/ith normal tension glaucoma (NTG). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sei. 1996;37(suppl):S28.
15. Brodsky MC, Glasier CM, Pollock SC, Angtuago EJ. Optic nerve hypoplasia: identification by magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108: 1562-1567.
16. Parravano JG, Toledo A, Kucharczyk W. Dimensions of the optic nerves, chiasm and tracts: MR quantitative comparison between patients with optic atrophy and normals. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993;17:688-690.
17. Stroman GA, Stewart WC, Golnik KC, Cur JK, Olinger RE. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with low-tension glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113: 168-172.