Factors affecting contrast enhancement of the hepatic parenchyma in CT after intravenous injection of iodinated contrast material;Parametres influencant le rehaussement parenchymateux hepatique en tomodensitometrie apres injection intraveineuse de produit de contraste iode

Journal de Radiologie

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 265-270

  Bonaldi, V M ^a,b   Garcia, P ^a,c   Bret, P M ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER UNIVERSITAIRE DE NICE   (France)

^c Clinique Protestante   (France)

Author keywords

computed tomography (CT); contrast enhancement; contrast media; helical CT; liver; spiral CT

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM; IODINE DERIVATIVE;

CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; LIVER PARENCHYMA; REVIEW; IMAGE QUALITY; LIVER; RADIOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IODINE COMPOUNDS; LIVER; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0030918858     PISSN: 02210363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Burgener FA, Hamlin DJ. Contrast enhancement of hepatic tumors in CT. Comparison between bolus and infusion techniques. AJR 1983; 140 : 291-5.
2. Foley WD. Dynamic Hepatic CT Scanning. AJR 1989; 152 : 272-4.
3. Heiken JP, Brink JA, Vannier MW. Spiral (Helical) CT. Radiology 1994; 189 : 647-56.
4. Nelson RC, Moyers JH, Chezmar et al. Hepatic Dynamic Sequential CT : Section enhancement profiles with a bolus of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. Radiology 1991; 178 : 499-502.
5. Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM, Dodd III GD, Miller WJ. Hepatic CT enhancement : Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients. Radiology 1994; 190 : 721-5.
6. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, Sagel SS, Crowe TM, Gaines MV. Dynamic incremental CT : Effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 1995; 195 : 353-7
7. Kormano M, Partanen K, Soimakallio S, Kivimaki T. Dynamic contrast enhancement of the upper abdomen : Effect of contrast medium and body weight. Invest Radiol 1983; 18 : 364-7.
8. Harmon BH, Berland LL, Lee JY. Effect of varying rates of low-osmolarity contrast media injection for hepatic CT : Correlation with indocyanine green transit time. Radiology 1992; 184 : 379-82.
9. Paushter DM, Xeman RK, Scheibler ML, Choyke PL, Jaffe MH, Clark LR. CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases : Comparison of techniques for IV contrast enhancement. AJR 1989; 152 : 267-71.
10. Bonaldi VM, Bret PB, Atri M, Garcia P, Reinhold C. A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas. AJR 1996; 167 : 49-55.
11. Chambers TP, Le Baron RL, Lush RM, Dodd GD, Miller WJ, Scharmen R. Hepatic CT enhancement : A method to demonstrate reproducibility. Radiology 1993; 188 : 627-31.
12. Garcia P, Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Liang LL, Atri M, Reinhold C. Effect of different rates of contrast medium injection on hepatic CT enhancement. Radiology 1996; 199: 185-9.
13. Garcia P, Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Genin G, Atri M, Thibodeau M. Effect of portal venous flow augmentation on liver enhancement with CT. Abdominal imaging 1996 (Sous presse).
14. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, Takashima T, Seez P, Matsuura K. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media : A report from the Japanese comittee on the safety of contrast media. Radiology 1990; 175 : 621-8.
15. Bettmann MA. Ionic versus nonionic contrast agents for intravenous use : Are all the answers in ? Radiology 1990; 175 : 616-8.
16. Berland LL. Slip-ring and conventional dynamic hepatic CT : Contrast material and timing considerations. Radiology 1995; 195 : 1-8.
17. Baker ME, Beam C, Leder R, Gulliver D, Paine SS, Dunnick NR. Contrast material for combined abdominal and pelvic CT : Can cost be reduced by increasing the concentration and decreasing the volume? AJR 1993; 160 : 637-41.
18. Berland LL, Lee JY. Comparison of contrast media injection rates and volumes for hepatic dynamic incremented computed tomography. Invest Radiol 1988; 23 : 918-22.
19. Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL, Sagel SS, Forman HP, DiCroce J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced Ct of the liver : Comparison of contrast medium injection rates and uniphasic and Diphasic injection protocols. Radiology 1993; 187: 327-31.
20. Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM. Hepatic CT enhancement ; Alterations in contrast material volume and rate of injection within the same patients. Radiology 1994; 193 : 518-22.
21. Herts BR, Paushter DM, Einstein DM, Zepp R, Friedman RA, Obuchowski N. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen : Comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times. AJR 1995; 164 : 327-31.
22. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, Giraud F. Central pulmonary thromboembolism : Diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique. Comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 1992; 185 : 381-7.
23. Bret PM, Valette PJ. Scanographie spiralée en pathologie abdominale (symposium). Journées Françaises de Radiologie. Paris, 23-27 octobre 1995.
24. Cox IH, Foley WD, Hoffmann RG. Right window for dynamic hepatic CT. Radiology 1991; 181 : 18-21.
25. Silverman PM, Brown B, Wray H, Fox SH, Cooper C, Roberts S, Zeman RK. Optimal contrast enhancement of the liver using helical (spiral) CT : Value of SmartPrep. AJR. 1995; 164: 1169-71.
26. Walkey MM. Dynamic hepatic CT : How many years will it take'til we learn? Radiology 1991; 181 : 17-24.
27. Freeny PC, Nghiem HV, Winter TC. Helical CT during arterial portography : Optimization of contrast enhancement and scanning parameters. Radiology 1995; 194 : 83-90.
28. Bluemke DA, Soyer PA, Chan BW, Bliss DF, Calhoun PS, Fishman EK. Spiral CT during arterial portography : Technique and applications. Radiographics 1995; 15 : 623-37.
29. Oberstein A, Kauczpr HU, Mildenberger P et al. Drei-phasen-spiral CT in der diagnostik von lebererkrankungen : Vergleich mit CT-arteriographie und CT-arterioportographie. Röfo. 1996; 164 : 449-6.
30. Fishman EK, Jeffrey RB Jr. Spiral CT, principles, techniques and clinical applications. Raven Press, New York, 1995, 45-56.
31. Kormano M, Dean PB. Extravascular contrast material : The major component of contrast enhancement. Radiology1976; 121 : 379-82.
32. Foley WD, Berland LL, Lawson TL, Smith DF, Thorsen MK. Contrast enhancement technique for dynamic hepatic computed tomographic scanning. Radiology 1983; 147 : 797-803.
33. Foley WD. Dynamic hepatic CT. Radiology 1989; 170 : 617-22.
34. Berland LL. Dynamic hepatic CT. Radiology 1991; 181 : 22-3.
35. Foley WD, Hoffmann RG, Quiroz FA, Kahn CE, Perret RS. Hepatic helical CT : Contrast injection protocol. Radiology 1994; 192 : 367-71.
36. Baron RL. Understanding and optimizing use of contrast material for CT of the liver. AJR 1994; 163 : 323-31.
37. Ohashi I, Hanafusa K, Yoshida T. Small hepatocellular carcinomas : Two-phase dynamic incremental CT in detection and evaluation. Radiology 1993; 189 : 851-5.
38. Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Reinhold C, Atri M. Helical CT of the liver : Value of an early hepatic arterial phase. Radiology 1995; 197 : 357-63.
39. Blum A, Régent D. Scanner hélicoidal : Principes et modalités pratiques d'utilisation. Masson, Paris, 1995, 45-52.