Analysis of voice changes after thyroplasty using linear predictive coding

Laryngoscope

Volumn 107, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 703-709

  Plant, Randall L ^a,b   Hillel, Allen D ^a   Waugh, Patricia F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; LARYNX DISORDER; LARYNX SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RECORDING; VOCAL CORD; VOICE;

ACOUSTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPEECH PERCEPTION; THYROID CARTILAGE; VOCAL CORD PARALYSIS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 0030915156     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199706000-00001     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Klingholz F, Martin F. Quantitative spectral evaluation of shimmer and jitter. J Speech Hearing Res 1985;28:169-74.
2. Rabinov CR, Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, et al. Comparing reliability of perceptual ratings of roughness and acoustic measures of jitter. J Speech Hearing Res 1995;38:26-32.
3. Hillenbrand J, Cleveland RA, Erickson RL. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. J Speech Hearing Res 1994;37:769-78.
4. Markel JD, Gray AH. Linear Prediction of Speech. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1976:42-91.
5. Parsons TW. Voice and Speech Processing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987:137-69.
6. Childers DG. Speech synthesis by glottal excited linear prediction. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;96(4):2026-36.
7. Mermelstein P. Speech Coding for Wireless Communication. Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. Pacific Grove, CA, 1994. New York: IEEE. Comput. Soc. Press; 1994.
8. Koike Y, Markel J. Application of inverse filtering for detecting laryngeal pathology. Ann Otol 1975;84:117-24.
9. Davis SB. Acoustic characteristics of laryngeal pathology. In: Darby JK, ed. Speech Evaluation in Medicine. New York: Grune & Stratton; 1981:77-104.
10. Prosek RA, Montgomery AA, Walden BE, et al. An evaluation of residue features as correlates of voice disorders. J Commun Disord 1987;20:105-17.
11. Eskenazi L, Childers DG, Hicks DM. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. J Speech Hearing Res 1990;33:298-306.
12. Mori K, Blaugrund SM, Yu JD. The turbulent noise ratio: an estimation of noise power of the breathy voice using PARCOR analysis. Laryngoscope 1994;104:153-8.
13. McGuirt WF, Blalock D, Koufman JA, et al. Comparative voice results after laser resection or irradiation of T1 vocal cord carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:951-5.
14. Rabiner LR, Schafer RW. Digital Processing of Speech Signals. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1978:419.
15. Fukazawa T, El-Assuooty A, Honjo I. A new index for evaluation of the turbulent noise in pathological voice. J Acoust Soc Am 1988;83(3):1189-93.