Should paediatric intensive care be centralised? (multiple letters) [9]

Lancet

Volumn 350, Issue 9070, 1997, Pages 65-68

  Maybloom, B ^a   Chapple, J ^a   Davidson, L ^a   Mawer, C ^a   Stack, C G ^a   Bennett, N R ^a   Goddard, J M ^a   Tasker, R C ^a   Tarnow Mordi, W ^a   Tucker, J ^a   Parry, G ^a   Buss, P ^a   Pearson, G ^a  

^a KCW Health Authority   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CENTRALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; LETTER; PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; AUSTRALIA; CHILD; CRITICAL ILLNESS; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; INFANT; NEWBORN; NOTE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRESCHOOL CHILD; UNITED KINGDOM;

CENTRALIZED HOSPITAL SERVICES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CRITICAL ILLNESS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTENSIVE CARE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); VICTORIA;

EID: 0030914434     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)26027-7     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. G Pearson F Shann P Barry Should paediatric intensive care be centralised? Trent versus Victoria Lancet 349 1997 1213 1217
2. R Gemke Centralisation of paediatric intensive care to improve outcome Lancet 349 1997 1187 1188
3. Emergency Cardiac Care Committee and Subcommittees, American Heart Association Part V: pediatric advanced life support JAMA 268 1992 2251 2261