Structure of the specific combining ability between two species of Eucalyptus. II. A clustering approach and a multiplicative model

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 94, Issue 6-7, 1997, Pages 804-809

  Baril, C P ^a,c   Verhaegen, D ^a   Vigneron, Ph ^a   Bouvet, J M ^a   Kremer, A ^b  

^a CIRAD   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

^c GEVES   (France)

Author keywords

AMMI model Eucalyptus; Analysis of interaction; Clustering procedure; Heterosis breeding

Indexed keywords

EUCALYPTUS;

EID: 0030911185     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050481     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baril CP, Denis JB, Brabant Ph (1994) Selection of locations using simultaneous clustering based on genotype-environment interaction. Can J Plant Sci 74 : 311-317
2. Baril CP, Denis JB, Wustman W, Van Eeuwijk FA (1995) Analysing genotype-by-environment interaction in Dutch potato variety trials using factorial regression. Euphytica 82 : 149-155
3. Baril CP, Verhaegen D, Vigneron Ph, Bouvet JM, Kremer A (1996) Structure of the specific combining ability between two species of Eucalyptus. I. RAPD data. Theor Appl Genet 94 : 796-803
4. Bouvet JM, Vigneron Ph (1995) Age trends in variances and heritabilities in Eucalyptus mating designs. Silvae Genet 44 : 206-216
5. Bradu D, Gabriel KR (1978) The bi-plot as a diagnostic tool for models of two-way tables. Technometrics 20 : 47-68
6. Byth DE, Eisemann RL, De Lacy IH (1976) Two-way pattern analysis of a large data set to evaluate genotypic adaptation. Heredity 37 : 215-230
7. Corsten LCA, Denis JB (1990) Structuring interaction in two-way tables by clustering. Biometrics 46 : 207-215
8. Crossa J, Gauch KG, Zobel RW (1990) Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials. Crop Sci 30 : 493-500
9. Decoux G, Denis JB (1991) INTERA: logicels pour l'interprétation statistique de l'interaction entre deux facteurs. Laboratorie de Biométrie INRA, route de Saint-Cyr F78026, Versailles Cedex, France
10. Denis JB (1988) Two-way analysis using co-variates. Statistics 19 : 123-132
11. Denis JB, Baril CP (1992) Sophisticated models with numerous missing values: the multiplicative interaction model as an example. Biuletyn Oceny Odmian, Poland, 33-45
12. Denis JB, Gower JC (1992) Bi-additive models. Technical report. Laboratorie de Biométrie, INRA, Route de Saint-Cyr F78026, Versailles, France
13. Denis JB, Gower JC (1994) Bi-additive models. Letter to the editor. Biometrics 50 : 310-311
14. Finlay KW, Wilkinson GN (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Aust J Agric Res 14 : 742-754
15. Gauch HG (1988) Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 88 : 705-715
16. Gollob HF (1968) A statistical model which combines features of factor-analytic and analysis of variance techniques. Psychometrika 33 : 73-113
17. Kempton RA (1984) The use of bi-plots in interpreting variety by environment interactions. J Agric Sci C 103 : 123-135
18. Mandel J (1969) The partitioning of interaction in analysis of variance. J Res Nat Bur Stand Sect B 73B (4) : 309-328
19. Mandel J (1971) A new analysis of variance model for non-additive data. Technometrics 13 : 1-18
20. Vigneron Ph (1991) Création et amélioration des variétés d'hybrides d'Eucalyptus au Congo. Proc Cony IUFRO Intensive forestry: the role of Eucalyptus, Durban, September 1991, pp 345-360