Comparison between two techniques for modeling interface conditions in a porous coated hip endoprosthesis

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 50-62

  Hefzy, Mohamed Samir ^a,b   Singh, Satinder Pal ^b  

^a KING FAISAL SPECIALIST HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Saudi Arabia)

^b The University of Toledo   (United States)

Author keywords

Gap elements; Implant interface; Joint interface elements; Non linear finite element modeling; Porous vs non porous coatings

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; COATINGS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); INTERFACES (MATERIALS); JOINTS (ANATOMY); KINEMATICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; POROSITY; STRESSES;

JOINT/INTERFACE ELEMENTS; POROUS COATINGS;

HIP PROSTHESES;

ARTICLE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 0030907262     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1350-4533(96)00033-1     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Grazier, K. L., Holbrook, T. L., Kelsey, J. L. and Stauffer, R. N., The Frequency of Occurence, Impact and Cost of Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States. AAOS Publications, Chicago, 1984.
2. Total hip replacement: NIH Consens Statement, 12(5), 12-14 September 1994, pp. 1-31.
3. Black, J., Orthopaedic Biomaterials in Research and Practice. Churchill Livingstone Publications, New York, 1988.
4. Andriacchi, T. P., Galante, J. O., Belytschko, T. B. and Hampton, S., A stress analysis of the femoral stem in total hip prostheses. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1976, 58A, 616-624.
5. McNeice, G. M., Eng, P. and Amstutz, H. C., Finite element studies in hip reconstruction. In Biomechanics V: Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Biomechanics, University Park Press, 1976, pp. 394-405.
6. Yettram, A. L. and Wright, K. W., Dependence of stem stresses in total hip replacement on prostheses and cement stiffness. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 1980, 2(1), 54-59.
7. Hampton, S. J., Andriacchi, T. P. and Galante, J. O., Three dimensional stress analysis of the femoral stem of a total hip prostheses. Journal of Biomechanics, 1980, 13(5), 443-448.
8. Huiskes, R. and Chao, E. Y. S., A survey of finite element analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics: the first decade. Journal of Biomechanics, 1983, 16(6), 385-409.
9. Crowninshield, R. D., Brand, R. A., Johnson, R. C. and Milroy, J. C., An analysis of femoral component stem design in total hip arthoplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1980, 62A(1), 68-78.
10. Tarr, R., Clarke, I. C., Gruen, T. A. and Sarmiento, A., Predictions of cement bone failure criteria: three dimensional finite element models versus clinical reality of total hip replacement. In Finite Elements in Biomechanics, ed. R. H. Gallagher et al. Wiley, New York, 1982, pp. 345-359.
11. Rohlmann, A., Mossner, U., Bergmann, G. and Kolbel, R., Finite element analysis and experimental investigation in a femur with hip endoprosthesis. Journal of Biomechanics, 1983, 16(9), 727-742.
12. Rohlmann, A., Cheal, E. J., Hayes, W. C. and Bergmann, G., A non-linear finite element analysis of interface conditions in porous coated hip endoprostheses. Journal of Biomechanics, 1988, 21(7), 605-611.
13. Rohlmann, A., Cheal, E. J., Hayes, W. C., Bergmann, G., A nonlinear finite element model for interface stresses in total hip replacements. In Material Properties and Stress Analysis in Biomechanics, ed. A. L. Yettram. Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1988, pp. 203-213.
14. Huiskes, R., Functional behavior of orthopaedic biomaterials. In Metal and Ceramic Biomaterials, Vol. 2: Strength and Surface, ed. P. Ducheyne and G. W. Hastings. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1984.
15. Weinans, H., Huiskes, R. and Grootenboer, H. J., Trends of mechanical consequences and modeling of a fibrous membrane around femoral hip prostheses. Journal of Biomechanics, 1990, 23(10), 991-1000.
16. Hori, R. Y. and Lewis, J. L., Mechanical properties of the fibrous tissue found at the bone-cement interface following total joint replacement. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1982, 16(6), 911-927.
17. Ling, R. S., Observations on the fixation of implants to the bony skeleton. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 1986, 210, 80-96.
18. Beer, G., An isoparametric joint/interface element for finite element analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1985, 21, 585-600.
19. Natarajan, R. N., Andriacchi, T. P. and Sumner, D. R., Micromotion in straight versus curved stem uncemented femoral component, 1991 Advances in Bioengineering, BED. ASME, 1991, 20, 177-180.
20. Natarajan, R. N., Andriacchi, T. P. and Sumner, D. R., A relationship between proximal femoral stress shielding and the extent of porous coating on anatomic and straight femoral components, 1992 Advances in Bioengineering BED. ASME, 1992, 22, 155-157.
21. Natarajan, R. N., Andriacchi, T. P. and Sumner, D. R., Micromotion in curved uncemented femoral stem depends on both the interface friction and stiffness. Transactions of the 40th annual Orthopaedic Research Society meeting, Vol. 19, Section 1, 1994, p. 224.
22. Wong, P. C. W., Kulhawy, F. H. and Ingraffea, A. R., Numerical modeling of interface behaviour for drilled shafts foundations under generalized loading. In Foundation Engineering: Current Principles and Practices, Vol. 1, ed. F. H. Kulhawy. American Society of Civil Engineering, New York, 1989, pp. 565-579.
23. Konieczynski, D. D., Bartel, D. L. and Keaveny, T., The effects of implant size and friction on early stability and load transfer of anatomic cementless hip implants, 1993 Bioengineering Conference BED June 25-29. ASME, 1993, 24, 556-559.
24. Rancourt, D., Shirazi-Adl, A., Drouin, G. and Paiement, G., Friction properties of the interface between poroussurfaced metals and tibial cancellous bone. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1990, 24(11), 1503-1519.