Evaluation of pancreas transplant needle biopsy: Reproducibility and revision of histologic grading system

Transplantation

Volumn 63, Issue 11, 1997, Pages 1579-1586

  Drachenberg, Cinthia B ^a   Papadimitriou, John C ^a   Klassen, David K ^a   Racusen, Lorraine C ^b   Hoehn Saric, Edward W ^a   Weir, Matthew R ^a   Kuo, Paul C ^a   Schweitzer, Eugene J ^a   Johnson, Lynt B ^a   Bartlett, Stephen T ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Division of Transplantation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE; CREATININE; CYCLOSPORIN; OKT 3; STEROID; TACROLIMUS; TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE;

ADULT; AMYLASE BLOOD LEVEL; ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; GRAFT REJECTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE TREATMENT; INTRAPERITONEAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PANCREAS BIOPSY; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRIACYLGLYCEROL LIPASE BLOOD LEVEL;

ADULT; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMANS; KIDNEY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PANCREAS; PANCREAS TRANSPLANTATION; PANCREATITIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0030905322     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-199706150-00007     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Stratta BJ, Sollinger HW, Perlman SB, et al. Early diagnosis and treatment of pancreas allograft rejection. Transpl Int 1988; 1: 6.
2. Klassen DK, Hoehn-Saric EW, Weir MR, et al. Isolated pancreas rejection in combined kidney pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 1996; 61: 974.
3. Secchi A, Pontrioli AE, Traeger J, et al. A method for early detection of graft failure in pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 1983; 35: 344.
4. Thomas F, Pittman K, Dabney L, et al. Studies of radioimmunoreactive urinary insulin (RUI) in the human: a new test for diagnosis of pancreas rejection. Transplant Proc 1989; 21: 2797.
5. Sutherland DER, Gruessner RWG, Gores PF. Pancreas and islet transplantation: an update. Transplant Rev 1994; 8: 185.
6. Marks WH, Borgstrom A, Marks CR, et al. Serum markers for pancreas rejection: long term behavior following clinical pancreatico-duodenal transplantation. Transplant Proc 1991; 23: 1596.
7. Perkal M, Marks C, Lorber MI, Marks WH. A three year experience with serum anodal trypsinogen as a biochemical marker for rejection in pancreatic allografts: false positives, tissue biopsy, comparison with other markers, and diagnostic strategies. Transplantation 1992; 53: 415.
8. Fernstad R, Tyden G, Brattstrom C, et al. Pancreas-specific protein: a new marker for graft rejection in pancreas transplant recipients. Diabetes 1989; 38 (suppl 1): 55.
9. Nyberg G, Olaavsson M, Norden G, et al. Pancreas-specific protein monitoring in pancreas transplantation. Transplant Proc 1991; 23: 1604.
10. Tyden G, Reinholt F, Brattstrom SO, et al. Diagnosis of pancreas graft rejection by pancreatic juice cytology. Transplant Proc 1989; 21: 2780.
11. Kuboto K, Reinholt FP, Tyden G, et al. Cytologic patterns in juice from human pancreatic transplants: correlation with histologic findings in the graft. Surgery 1991; 109: 507.
12. Radio SJ, Stratta RJ, Taylor RF, Linder J. The utility of urine cytology in the diagnosis of allograft rejection after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1993; 55: 509.
13. Mittal VK, Toledo-Pereyra LH. Urinary cytology as a complementary marker of rejection in combined kidney and pancreatic transplants with urinary drainage. Transplant Proc 1990; 22: 629.
14. Powell CS, Lindsey NJ, Noloen MS, et al. The value of urinary amylase as a marker of early pancreatic allograft rejection. Transplantation 1987; 43: 921.
15. Mouzarkel M, Benoit G, Charpentier B, et al. Is urinary amylase a reliable index for monitoring whole pancreas graft function? Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 925.
16. Prieto M, Sutherland DER, Fernandez-Cruz L, et al. Experimental and clinical experience with urine amylase monitoring for early diagnosis of rejection in pancreas transplantation. Transplantation 1987; 43: 71.
17. Dafoe DC, Campbell DA, Rocher L, et al. Diagnosis of rejection in simultaneous renal/pancreas (urinary bladder drained) transplantation. Transplant Proc 1987; 19: 2345.
18. Nankivell BJ, Allen RDM, Bell B, et al. Urinary amylase measurement for detection of bladder-drained pancreas allograft rejection. Transplant Proc 1990; 22: 2158.
19. Munn SR, Engen DE, Barr D, et al. Differential diagnosis of hypoamylasuria in pancreas allograft recipients with urinary exocrine drainage. Transplantation 1990; 49: 359.
20. Nghiem DD, Conrad GR, Rezai K, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic rejection with Tc-99 m DTPA scintigraphy. Transplant Proc 1989; 21: 2791.
21. 111Indium platelets in monitoring pancreatic allografts in man. Br J Surg 1985; 72: 228.
22. Sutherland DER, Gruessner A. Pancreas transplantation in the United States as reported to the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) and analyzed by the International Pancreas Transplant Registry. In: Cecka JM, Terasaki PI, eds. Clinical transplants 1995. Los Angeles CA: UCLA Tissue Typing Laboratory, 1996: 49.
23. Sutherland DER, Casanova D, Sibley RK. Monitoring and diagnosis of rejection: role of pancreas graft biopsies in the diagnosis and treatment of rejection after pancreas transplantation. Transplant Proc 1987; 19: 2329.
24. Jamieson C, Burry KD, Colapinto ND. Evaluation of intraoperative biopsy of the pancreas. Can J Surg 1977; 20: 546.
25. Carpenter HA, Engen DE, Munn SR, et al. Histologic diagnosis of rejection by using cystoscopically directed needle biopsy specimens from dysfunctional pancreatoduodenal allografts with exocrine drainage into the bladder. Am J Surg Pathol 1990; 14: 837.
26. Jones JW, Nakhleh RE, Casanova D, Sutherland DER, Gruessner RWG. Cystoscopic transduodenal pancreas transplant biopsy: a new needle. Transplant Proc 1994; 26: 527.
27. Perkins JD, Munn SR, Marsh CL, Barr D, Engen DF, Carpenter HA. Safety and efficacy of cystoscopically directed biopsy in pancreas transplantation. Transplant Proc 1990; 22: 665.
28. Allen RDM, Wilson TG, Grierson JM, et al. Percutaneous biopsy of bladder-drained pancreas transplants. Transplantation 1991; 51: 1213.
29. Gaber AO, Gaber LW, Shokouh-Amiri MH, Hathaway D. Percutaneous biopsy of pancreas transplants. Transplantation 1992; 54: 548.
30. Nakhleh RE, Sutherland DER. Pancreas rejection: significance of histopathologic findings with implications for classification of rejection. Am J Surg Pathol 1992; 16: 1098.
31. Sibley RK, Sutherland DER. Pancreas transplantation: an immunohistologic and histopathologic examination of 100 grafts. Am J Surg Pathol 1987; 128: 151.
32. Drachenberg C, Klassen D, Bartlett S, et al. Histologic grading of pancreas acute allograft rejection in percutaneous needle biopsies. Transplant Proc 1996; 28: 512.
33. Bartlett ST, Schweitzer EJ, Johnson LB, et al. Equivalent success of simultaneous pancreas kidney and solitary pancreas transplantation: a prospective trial of tacrolimus immunosuppression with percutaneous biopsy. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 440.
34. Allen RDM, Grierson JM, Ekberg H, et al. Longitudinal histopathologic assessment of rejection after bladder-drained canine pancreas allograft transplants. Am J Pathol 1991; 138: 303.
35. Schulak JA, Drevyanko TF. Experimental pancreas allograft rejection: correlation between histologic and functional rejection and the efficacy of antirejection therapy. Surgery 1985; 98: 330.
36. Steineger B, Klempnauer J. Distinct histologic patterns of acute prolonged, and chronic rejection in vascularized rat pancreas allografts. Am J Pathol 1986; 124: 253.
37. Carpenter HA, Barr D, Marsh CL, Miller AR, Perkins JD. Sequential histopathologic changes in pancreaticoduodenal allograft rejection in dogs. Transplantation 1989; 48: 764.
38. Stevens SK, Weisman IL, Butcher EC. Differences in the migration of B and T-lymphocytes: organ selective localization in vivo and the role of lymphocyte-endothelial cell recognition. J Immunol 1982; 128: 844.
39. Papadimitriou JC, Klassen DK, Hebel JR, Drachenberg CB. Quantitative evaluation of ancillary morphological parameters in the assessment of rejection in renal transplant biopsies. Int J Surg Pathol 1995; 2 (suppl): 456.
40. Dietze O, Habringer C, Krausler R, Klima G, Margreiter, R. Histologic classification of pancreatic allograft rejection in the rat. Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 932.
41. Solez K, Axelsen RA, Benediktsson H, et al. International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int 1993; 44: 411.
42. Snover DC. Clinically silent rejection: what's in a name anyway? Hum Pathol 1996; 27: 319.
43. Drachenberg CB, Papadimitriou JC. Diagnosis of pancreas allograft rejection in percutaneous needle biopsies from patients with non-immune related graft pathology. Pathol Int 1996; 46 (suppl 1): 533.
44. Nakhleh RE, Gruessner RWG, Swanson PE, et al. Pancreas transplant pathology: a morphologic, immunohistochemical and electron microscopic comparison of allogeneic grafts with rejection, syngeneic grafts, and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Surg Pathol 1991; 15: 246.
45. Drachenberg CB, Papadimitriou JC, Weir MR, et al. Histologic findings in islets of whole pancreas allografts. Transplantation 1996; 62: 1770.