Attachment of Vero cells to corona-treated, plastic surfaces

Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering

Volumn 83, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 173-178

  Ramsay, Juliana ^a,b   Rhazi, Bouchra ^a   Garnier, Alain ^a   Sapieha, Slawomir ^a   Chavarie, Claude ^a   Ramsay, Bruce ^a  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

adhesion free energy; corona treatment; interfacial energy; mammalian cells; polyethylene; polystyrene

Indexed keywords

ADSORPTION; ELECTRIC CORONA; ELECTROSTATICS; FREE ENERGY; INTERFACIAL ENERGY; POLYETHYLENES; POLYSTYRENES; PROTEINS; SHEAR STRESS; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE TREATMENT;

VERO CELLS;

ANIMAL CELL CULTURE;

POLYETHYLENE; POLYSTYRENE;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE; HYDROPHOBICITY; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN BINDING; SHEAR STRESS; VERO CELL;

ANIMALIA; BOVINAE; CICONIIFORMES; MAMMALIA;

EID: 0030903416     PISSN: 0922338X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0922-338X(97)83578-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Trommler, A., Gingell, D., and Wolf, H.: Red blood cells experience electrostatic repulsion but make molecular adhesions to glass. Biophys. J., 46, 835-841 (1985).
2. Absolom, D. R.: Erythrocyte adhesion to polymer surfaces: physicochemical and hydrodynamic factors, p. 235-254. In Ratner, B. D. (ed.), Surface characterization of biomaterials. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands (1988).
3. Horisberger, M.: Adhesion of human red blood cells to polystyrene. Influence of sodium chloride concentration and of neuraminidase treatment. Experentia, 35, 612-614 (1979).
4. Horisberger, M.: Adhesion of human and chicken red blood cells to polystyrene: influence of electrolyte and polyethyleneglycol concentration. Physiol. Chem. Phys., 12, 195-204 (1980).
5. Schakenraad, J. M., Busscher, H. J., Wildevuur, C. R. H., and Arends, J.: The influence of substratum surface free energy on growth and spreading of human fibroblasts in the presence and absence of serum proteins. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 20, 773784 (1986).
6. Shiga, T., Sekiya, M., Maeda, N., and Oka, S.: Statistical determination of red cell adhesion to material surface by varying shear forces. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 107, 194-198 (1985).
7. Gingell, D. and Fontes, J. A.: Interactions of blood cells with a polarized electrode (evidence of long-range intermolecular forces). J. Biophys., 16, 1131-1153 (1976).
8. McKeehan, W. L.: Use of basic polymers as synthetic substrata for cell culture, p. 209-213. In Barnes, D. W., Sirbasku, D. A., and Sato, G. H. (ed.), Methods for preparation of media, supplements, and substrata for serum-free animal cell culture. A.R.Liss, New York (1984).
9. Horbett, T. A., Waldburger, J. J., Ratner, B. D., and Hoffman, A. S.: Cell adhesion to a series of hydrophilichydrophobic copolymers studied with a spinning disc apparatus. J. Biomedical Mater. Res., 22, 383-404 (1988).
10. Klemperer, H. G. and Knox, P.: Attachment and growth of BHK and liver cells on polystyrene: effect of surface groups introduced by treatment with chromic acid. Laboratory Practice, 26, 179-180 (1977).
11. Wu, S.: Polymer interface and adhesion, 1st edition. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1982).
12. Chinn, J. A., Horbett, T. A., Ratner, B. D., Schway, M. B., Haque, Y., and Hauschka, S. D.: Enhancement of serum fibronectine adsorption and the clonal plating efficiencies of Swiss Mouse 3T3 fibroblast and MM 14 Mouse myoblast cells on polymer substrates modified by radiofrequency plasma deposition. J. Coll. Interf. Sci., 127, 67-87 (1989).
13. Dekker, A., Reitsma, K., Beugeling, Y., Bantjes, A., Feijen, J., and van Aken, W. G.: Adhesion of endothelial cells and adsorption of serum proteins on gas plasma-treated polytetrafluoroethylene. Biomaterials, 12, 130-138 (1991).
14. Lee, J. H., Park, J. W., and Lee, H. B.: Cell adhesion and growth on polymer surfaces with hydroxyl groups prepared by water vapour plasma treatment. Biomaterials, 12, 443-448 (1991).
15. Neumann, A. W., Good, K. J., Hope, C. J., and Sejpal, M.: An equation of state approach to determine surface tensions of low-energy solids from contact angles. J. Colloid Interface Sci., 49, 291-304 (1974).
16. Neumann, A. W., Hum, O. S., Francis, D. W., Zingg, W., and van Oss, C. J.: Conversion tables of contact angles to surface tensions. Sep. Purif. Methods, 9, 62-163 (1980).
17. Sapieha, S.: The effect of corona modification on the composite interfaces, p. 433-434. In Akovali, G. (ed.), The interfacial interactions in polymeric composites, vol. 230. NATO ASI Series, Kluwer Press, Amsterdam (1988).
18. Sapieha, S., Cerny, J., Klemberg-Sapieha, J. E., and Martinu, L.: Corona versus low pressure plasma treatment: effect on surface properties and adhesion of polymers. J. Adhesion, 42, 91-102 (1993).
19. Kaelble, D. H., Dynes, P. J., and Cirlin, E. H.: Interfacial bonding and environmental stability of polymer matrix composites. J. Adhesion, 6, 23-48 (1974).
20. van Oss, C. J., Gillman, C. F., and Neumann, A. W.: Phagocytic engulf ment and cell adhesiveness. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York (1975).