Identifying carriers at high risk for negative reactions when performing prenatal diagnosis of haemophilia

Haemophilia

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 123-130

  Tedgard U ^a   Ljung, R ^a   Mcneil, T F ^a   Tedgard E ^b,c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Ystad Hospital   (Sweden)

^c LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Fetal blood sampling; Haemophilia; Pregnancy; Prenatal diagnosis; Psychological; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEPRESSION; DISEASE CARRIER; FETUS; FETUS BLOOD; HEMOPHILIA A; HEMOPHILIA B; HUMAN; MOOD; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0030902308     PISSN: 13518216     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2516.1997.00093.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beeson D, Golbus MS. Anxiety engendered by amniocentesis. Birth Defects 1979; 15: 191-7.
2. Verjaal M, Leschot NJ, Treffers PE. Women's experiences with second trimester prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 1982; 2: 195-209.
3. Fava GA, Michelacci L, Trombini G, Bovicelli L, Orlandi C. Psychological reactions to fetoscopy: a controlled study. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4: 397-404.
4. Lippman A, Tracy BP, Mandel S, Cartier L. Chorionic villi sampling: women's attitudes. Am J Med Genet 1985; 22: 395-401.
5. Spencer JW, Cox DN. Emotional responses of pregnant women to chorionic villi sampling or amniocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 157: 1155-60.
6. Sjögren B, Uddenberg N. Prenatal diagnosis and psychological distress: amniocentesis or chorionic villus biopsy? Prenat Diagn 1989; 9: 477-87.
7. Robinson J, Tennes K, Robinson A. Amniocentesis: its impact on mothers and infants. A 1-year follow-up. Clin Genet 1975; 8: 97-106.
8. Evers-Kiebooms G, Swertz A, van den Berghe H. Psychological aspects of amniocentesis: anxiety feelings in three different risk groups. Clin Genet 1988; 33: 196-206.
9. Sjögren B, Uddenberg N. Prenatal diagnosis for psychological reasons: comparison with other indications, advanced maternal age and known genetic risk. Prenat Diagn 1990; 10: 111-20.
10. Rodeck CH, Campell S. Umbilical-cord insection as source of pure fetal blood for prenatal diagnosis. Lancet 1979; i: 1244-5.
11. Tedgård U, Ljung R, McNeil T, Tedgård E, Schwartz M. How do carriers of haemophilia experience prenatal diagnosis (PND)? Carrier's immediate and later reactions to amniocentesis and fetal blood sampling. Acta Paediatr Scand 1989; 78: 692-700.
12. Nielsen CC. An encounter with modern medical technology: women's experiences with amniocentesis. Women Health 1981; 6: 109-24.
13. Kennel JH, Slyter H, Klaus MH. The mourning response of parents to the death of a newborn infant. N Engl J Med 1970; 283: 344-9.
14. Lubs M-L. Does genetic counseling influence risk attitudes and decision making? Birth Defects 1979; 15: 355-67.
15. Ekwo EE, Kim J-O, Gosselink CA. Parental perceptions of the burden of genetic disease. Am J Med Genet 1987; 28: 955-63.
16. Kraus EM, Brettler DB. Assessment of reproductive risks and intentions by mothers of children with haemophilia. Am J Med Genet 1988; 31: 259-67.
17. Varekamp I, Suurmeijer Th PBM, Bröcker-Vriends AHJT, et al. Carrier testing and prenatal diagnosis for haemophilia: experiences and attitudes of 549 potential and obligate carriers. Am J Med Genet 1990; 37: 147-54.
18. Fletcher J. The Brink: the parent-child bond in the genetic revolution. Theological Studies 1972; 33: 457-85.
19. Blumberg BD, Golbus MS, Hanson KA. The psychological sequelae of abortion performed for a genetic indication. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975; 122: 799-808.
20. Bibring GL, Dwyer TF, Huntington DS, Valenstein AF. A study of the psychological processes in pregnancy and of the earliest mother-child relationship. I. Some propositions and comments. Psychoanal Stud Child 1961; 16: 9-23.
21. Solnit AJ, Stark MH. Mourning and the birth of a defective chid. In: Eissler RS, Freud A, Kris M, Solnit AJ, eds. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. London: Yale University Press, 1961: 523-7.
22. Uddenberg N. Reproductive adaptation in mother and daughter. A study of personality development and adaptation to motherhood. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1974; 254.
23. Lussier A. The physical handicap and the body ego. Int J Psycho-Anal 1980; 61: 179-85.
24. Lubin B, Gardener SH, Roth A. Mood and somatic symptoms during pregnancy. Psychosom Med 1975; 37: 136-46.
25. Cullberg J. Kris och utveckling (Crisis and Development) Stockholm: Natur och Kultur, 1975.
26. The National Central Bureau of Statistics of Swedish socioeconomic classification. Reports on statistical coordination 1982:4. Stockholm: 1982.
27. Nilsson Å. Para-natal emotional adjustment. A prospective investigation of 165 women. Part I. A general account of background variables, attitudes towards childbirth, and an appreciation of psychiatric morbidity. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 1970: 220.
28. Rosen RH, Ager JW, Martindale LJ. Contraception, abortion and self-concept. J Populat 1979; 2: 118-39.
29. Folkman S, Lazarus RS. The relationship between coping and emotion: implications for theory and research. Soc Sci Med 1988; 26: 309-17.
30. Miller SM, Mangan CE. Interacting effects of information and coping style in adapting to gynecologic stress: should the doctor tell all? J Personal Soc Psychol 1983; 45: 223-36.
31. Phipps S, Zinn AB. Pscyhological responses to amniocentesis: II. Effects of coping style. Am J Med Genet 1986; 25: 143-8.
32. Langer M, Ringler M. Prospective counselling after prenatal diagnosis of fetal malformations: interventions and parental reactions. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989; 68: 323-9.