Change in the use of breast-conserving surgery in western Washington after the 1990 NIH Consensus Development Conference

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 418-423

  Lazovich, DeAnn ^a   White, Emily ^b   Thomas, David B ^b   Moe, Roger E ^c   Taplin, Stephen ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Immunization Studies Program   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 0030901620     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430280092014     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:6-11.
2. Sarrazin D, Le M, Rouesse J, et al. Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in breast cancer tumors with macroscopic diameter of 20 millimeters or less. Cancer. 1984;53:1209-1213.
3. Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R, et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:665-673.
4. Veronesi U, Banfi A, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparison of Halsted mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection and radiotherapy in early breast cancer: long term results. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1986;22:1085-1089.
5. Sarrazin D, Le MG, Arriagada R, et al. Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1989;14:177-184.
6. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:822-828.
7. NIH Consensus Conference. Treatment of early breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;265:391-395.
8. Mann BA, Samet JM, Hunt WC, Key CR, Goodwin JM, Goodwin JS. Changing treatment of breast cancer in New Mexico from 1969 through 1985. JAMA. 1988;259:3413-3417.
9. Swanson GM, Satariano ER, Satariano WA, Osuch JR. Trends in conserving treatment of invasive carcinoma of the breast in females. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;171:465-471.
10. Lazovich D, White E, Thomas DB, Moe RE. Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;266:3433-3438.
11. Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, Yahnke D, Goodwin JS. Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1102-1107.
12. Osteen RT, Steele GD, Merck HR, Winchester DP. Regional differences in surgical management of breast cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1992;42:39-43.
13. Satariano ER, Swanson GM, Moll PP. Nonclinical factors associated with surgery received for treatment of early stage breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:195-198.
14. Beahrs OH, Henson DE, Hutter RVP, Myers MH (American Joint Committee on Cancer), eds. Manual for Staging of Cancer. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott Co; 1988:145-150.
15. Census of Population and Housing, 1990 [summary tape file 3A on CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: US Bureau of the Census; 1992.
16. American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology. Membership Directory. Reston, Va: American Society of Therapeutic Radiation Oncology; 1990.
17. American Hospital Association. American Hospital Association Guide to the Health Care Field. Chicago, III: American Hospital Association; 1989.
18. Council of Teaching Hospitals, Association of American Medical Colleges. Membership Directory. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1988.
19. Breslow NE, Day NE. The analysis of case-control studies. In: Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1980;1.
20. Gleicher N. Cesarean section rates in the United States: the short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980. JAMA. 1984;252:3273-3276.
21. Kosecoff J, Kanouse DE, Brook RH. Changing practice patterns in the management of primary breast cancer: Consensus Development Program. Health Serv Res. 1990;25:809-823.
22. Kosecoff J, Kanouse DE, Rogers WH, McCloskey L, Winslow CM, Brook RH. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. JAMA. 1987;258:2708-2713.
23. Sherman CR, Potosky AL, Weis KA, Ferguson JH. The Consensus Development Program: detecting changes in medical practice following a consensus conference on the treatment of prostate cancer. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1992;8:683-693.
24. Moxley JH, Allegra JC, Henney J, Muggia F. Treatment of primary breast cancer: summary of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. JAMA. 1980;244:797-800.
25. Wilson RE, Donegan WL, Mettlin C, Smart CR, Murphy GP. The 1982 national survey of carcinoma of the breast in the United States by the American College of Surgeons. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1984;159:309-318.
26. Mullan F, Jacoby I. The town meeting for technology: the maturation of consensus conferences. JAMA. 1985;254:1068-1072.
27. Jacoby I, Clark SM. Direct mailing as a means of disseminating NIH consensus statements: a comparison with current techniques. JAMA. 1986;255:1328-1330.
28. Winkler JD, Kanouse DE, Brodsley L, Brook RH. Popular press coverage of eight National Institutes of Health consensus development topics. JAMA. 1986;255:1323-1327.
29. Polissar L, Finley ML. Time trends and key factors in the choice of one-step or two-step biopsy and surgery for breast cancer. Soc Sci Med. 1985;21:733-740.
30. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Free Press; 1983.