Mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster selected for altered longevity

Evolution

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 303-307

  Pletcher, Scott D ^a   Fukui, H Henry ^a   Curtsinger, James W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Drosophila; life histories; longevity selection; reproductive behavior; senescence; trade offs

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; MELANOGASTER;

EID: 0030901392     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02413.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. CASARES, P., M. C. CARRACEDO, E. S. MIGUEL, R. PINEIRO, AND L. GARCIA-FLOREZ. 1993. Male mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster: Differences in genetic architecture and in relative performance according to female genotype. Behav. Genet. 23: 349-358.
2. CHAPMAN, T., L. F. LIDDLE, J. M. KALB, M. F. WOLFNER, AND L. PARTRIDGE. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373:241-244.
3. CHIPPINDALE, A. K., D. T. HOANG, P. M. SERVICE, AND M. R. ROSE. 1994. The evolution of development in Drosophila melanogaster selected for postponed senescence. Evolution 48:1880-1899.
4. CURTSINGER, J. W., H. H. FUKUI, A. A. KHAZAELI, A. W. KIRSCHER, S. D. PLETCHER, D. E. L. PROMISLOW, AND M. TATAR. 1995. Genetic variation and aging. Annu. Rev. Gen. 29:553-575.
5. FUKUI, H. H., S. D. PLETCHER, AND J. W. CURTSINGER. 1995. Selection for increased longevity in Drosophila melanogaster: A reply to Baret and Lints. Gerontology 41:65-68.
6. KESSLER, S. 1969. The genetics of Drosophila mating behavior. II. The genetic architecture of mating speed in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 62:421-433.
7. LEROI, A. M., A. K. CHIPPINDALE, AND M. R. ROSE. 1994. Long-term laboratory evolution of a genetic life-history trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. The role of genotype-environment interaction. Evolution 48:1244-1257.
8. LUCKINBILL, L. S., R. ARKING, M. J. CLARE, W. C. CIROCCO, AND S. A. BUCK. 1984. Selection for delayed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38:996-1003.
9. LUCKINBILL, L. S., J. L. GRAVES, A. TOMKIW, AND O. SOWIRKA. 1988. A qualitative analysis of some life-history correlates of longevity in Drosophila melanogasler. Evol. Ecol. 2:85-94.
10. MANNING, A. 1961. The effects of artificial selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogasler. Anim. Behav. 9:82-92.
11. _. 1963. Selection for mating speed in Drosophila melanogaster based on the behaviour of one sex. Anim. Behav. 11:116-120.
12. _. 1967. The control of sexual receptivity in female Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 15:239-250.
13. _. 1968. The effects of artificial selection for slow mating in Drosophila simulans. I. The behavioural changes. Anim. Behav. 16:108-113.
14. MARKOW, T. A., AND S. J. HANSON. 1981. Multivariate analysis of Drosophila courtship. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 78:430-434.
15. OHLERT, G., AND C, BINGHAM. 1994. MacAnova 3.35. Dept. of Statistics. Univ. of Minnesota, Saint Paul.
16. PARSONS, P. A. 1964. A diallel cross for mating speeds in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 35:141-151.
17. PARTRIDGE, L., AND R. ANDREWS. 1985. The effect of reproductive activity on the longevity of male Drosophila melanogaster is not caused by an acceleration of ageing. J. Insect Physiol. 31:393-395.
18. PARTRIDGE, L., AND M. FARQUHAR. 1981. Sexual activity reduces lifespan of male fruit flies. Nature 294:580-581.
19. PARTRIDGE, L., AND K. FOWLER. 1992. Direct and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 46:76-91.
20. PARTRIDGE, L., K. FOWLER, S. TREVITT, AND W. SHARP. 1986. An examination of the effects of males on the survival and egg-production rates of female Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 32:925-929.
21. PARTRIDGE, L., A. GREEN, AND K. FOWLER. 1987a. Effects of egg-production and of exposure to males on female survival in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 33:745-749.
22. PARTRIDGE, L., A. EWING, AND A. CHANDLER. 1987b. Male size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster: The roles of male and female behavior. Anim. Behav. 35:555-562.
23. REZNICK, D. 1992. Measuring the costs of reproduction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7:42-45.
24. ROSE, M. R. 1984. Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38:1004-1010.
25. ROSE, M. R., M. L. DOREY, A. M. COYLE, AND P. M. SERVICE. 1984. The morphology of postponed scenescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Can. J. Zool. 62:1576-1580.
26. SAS INSTITUTE. 1985. SAS guide to macro processing 6.03. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
27. SERVICE, P. M. 1989. The effect of mating status on lifespan, egg laying and starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to selection on longevity. J. Insect Phisiol. 35:447-452.
28. _. 1993. Laboratory evolution of longevity and reproductive components in male fruit flies: Mating ability. Evolution 47:387-399.
29. SERVICE, P. M., E. W. HUTCHINSON, AND M. R. ROSE. 1988. Multiple genetic mechanisms for the evolution of senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 42:708-716.
30. TATAR, M., J. R. CAREY, AND J. VAUPEL. 1993. Long-term cost of reproduction with and without accelerated senescence in Callosobruchus maculatus: Analysis of age-specific mortality. Evolution 475:1302-1312.
31. WEBER, K. E., AND L. T. DIGGINS. 1990. Increased selection response in larger populations. II. Selection of ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster at two population sizes. Genetics 125:585-597.