Body composition analysis by DEXA by using dynamically changing samarium filtration

Journal of Applied Physiology

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 1200-1209

  Gotfredsen, Anders ^a,b   Bæeksgaard, Lene ^a   Hilsted, Jannik ^a  

^a Copenhagen University Hospital ^*  (Denmark)

^b SLAGELSE HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

body composition; dual energy X ray absorptiometry; dynamic samarium filtration; fat mass; fat free mass

Indexed keywords

LARD; PLASTIC; SAMARIUM;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY FAT; BODY MASS; CATTLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FEMALE; FILTRATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MUSCLE TISSUE; NONHUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION PROTECTION; SOFT TISSUE; WHOLE BODY SCINTISCANNING;

EID: 0030901358     PISSN: 87507587     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.4.1200     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Blake, G. M., D. B. McKeeney, S. C. Chhaya, P. J. Ryan, and I. Fogelman. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: the effects of beam hardening on bone density measurements. Med. Phys. 19: 459-465, 1992.
2. Friedl, K. E., J. P. DeLuca, L. J. Marchitelli, and J. A, Vogel. Reliability of body-fat estimations from a four-compartment model by using density, body water, and bone mineral measurements. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 55: 764-770, 1992.
3. Fuller, N. J., S. A. Jebb, M. A. Laskey, W. A. Coward, and M. Elia. Four-component model for the assessment of body composition in humans: comparison with alternative methods, and evaluation of the density and hydration of the fat free mass. Clin. Sci. Lond. 82: 687-693, 1992.
4. Fuller, N. J., M. B. Sawyer, M. A. Laskey, P. Paxton, and M. Elia. Bias between two reference methods of body composition assessment in elderly men (Abstract). Clin. Nutr. 13, Suppl. 1: P25, 1994.
5. Goodsitt, M. M. Evaluation of a new set of calibration standards for the measurement of fat via DPA and DEXA. Med. Phys. 19: 35-44, 1992.
6. Haarbo, J., A. Gotfredsen, C. Hassager, and C. Christiansen. Validation of body composition by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Clin. Physiol. Oxf. 11: 331-341, 1991.
7. Hangartner, T. N., and C. C. Johnston. Influence of fat on bone measurements with dual-energy absorptiometry. Bone Min. 9: 71-81, 1990.
8. Hansen, M. A., C. Hassager, K. Overgaard, U. Marslew, B. J. Riis, and C. Christiansen. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: a precise method of measuring bone mineral density in the lumbar spine. J. Nucl. Med. 31: 1156-1162, 1990.
9. Hassager, C., S. S. Sørensen, B. Nielsen, and C. Christiansen. Body composition measurement by dual photon absorptiometry: comparison with body density and total body potassium measurements. Clin. Physiol. Oxf. 9: 353-360, 1989.
10. Hendel, H. W., A. Gotfredsen, A. Andersen, L. Højgaard, and J. Hilsted. Body composition during weight loss in obese patients estimated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and by total body potassium. Int. J. Obes. 20: 1111-1119, 1996.
11. Heymsfield, S. B., and M. Waki. Body composition in humans: advances in the development of multicompartment models. Nutr. Rev. 49: 97-108, 1991.
12. Heymsfield, S. B., J. Wang, J. J. Kehayias, S. Heshka, S. Lichtman, and R. N. Pierson, Jr. Chemical determination of human body density in vivo: relevance to hydrodensitometry. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 50: 1282-1289, 1989.
13. Jensen, L. B., F. Quaade, and O. H. Sørensen. Bone loss accompanying voluntary weight loss in obese humans. J. Bone Min. Res. 9: 459-463, 1994.
14. Johansson, A. G., A. Forslund, A. Sjödin, H. Mallmin, L. Hambraeus, and S. Ljunghall. Determination of body composition - a comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and hydrodensitometry. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 57:323-326, 1993.
15. Lehmann, L. A., R. E. Alvarez, A. Macovski, and W. R. Brody. Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography. Med. Phys. 8: 659-667, 1981.
16. Mazess, R. B., H. S. Barden, J. P. Bisek, and J. Hanson. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 51: 1106-1112, 1990.
17. Mee, R. W., and T. C. Chua. Regression toward the mean and the paired sample t-test. Am. Statistician 45: 39-42, 1991.
18. Nord, R. H., and R. K. Payne. Body composition by DEXA - a review of the technology. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 3, Suppl. 1: S1-S6, 1994.
19. Nord, R. H., and R. K. Payne. Computation of bone density from dual energy X-ray data - an empirical method (Abstract). Calcif. Tissue Int. Suppl. 44: 5-62, 1989.
20. Roubenoff, R., and J. J. Kehayias. The meaning and measurement of lean body mass. Nutr. Rev. 49: 163-175, 1991.
21. Svendsen, O. L., J. Haarbo, C. Hassager, and C. Christiansen. Accuracy of measurements of body composition by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 57: 605-608, 1993.
22. Tothill, P., A. Avenell, J. Love, and D. M. Reid. Comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers and other techniques used for whole-body soft tissue measurements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 48: 781-794, 1994.
23. Vogel, J. A., and K. E. Friedl. Body fat assessment in women. Special considerations. Sports Med. 13: 245-269, 1992.
24. Wahner, H. W., W. L. Dunn, M. L. Brown, R. L. Morin, and B. L. Riggs. Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and dual photon absorptiometry for bone mineral measurements of the lumbar spine. Mayo Clin. Proc. 63: 1075-1084, 1988.