Physiological changes during acute obstruction of the superior vena cava, azygos, and internal thoracic veins in dogs

Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 87-92

  Urayama, H ^a   Kawase, Y ^a   Ohtake, H ^a   Kawasuji, M ^a   Watanabe, Y ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIV SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Somatosensory evoked potential; Tetrazolium stain; Vena cava, superior

Indexed keywords

TETRAZOLIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; AZYGOS VEIN; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN INJURY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; LATENT PERIOD; MITOCHONDRION; NONHUMAN; STAINING; SUPERIOR CAVA VEIN; VEIN LIGATION; VEIN OCCLUSION; VENOUS PRESSURE;

ANIMALS; AZYGOS VEIN; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; BRAIN; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CONSTRICTION; DOGS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; THORAX; VEINS; VENA CAVA, SUPERIOR; VENOUS PRESSURE;

EID: 0030896295     PISSN: 00219509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Carlson HA. Obstruction of the superior vena cava. Arch Surg 1934;29:669-77.
2. Karibe T. Experimental study on the possibility and limitation of the resection of superior vena cava. J Chiba Med 1955;31:689-97 (in Japanese).
3. Smith RA. The results of raising the resectability rate in operations for lung carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1964;48:418-29.
4. Dartevelle P, Chapelier A, Navajas M et al. Replacement of the superior vena cava with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts combined with resection of mediastinal-pulmonary malignant tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;94:361-6.
5. Salsali M. A safe technique for resection of the nonobstructed superior vene cava. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1966;123:91-8.
6. Jarvis FJ, Kanar EA. Physiologic changes following obstruction of the superior vena cava. J Thorac Surg 1954;27:213-21.
7. Koshu K, Kamiyama K, Oka N, Endo S, Takaku A, Saito T. Measurement of regional blood flow using hydrogen gas generated by electrolysis. Stroke 1982;13:483-7.
8. Allison T, Hume AL. A comparative analysis of short-latency somatosensory evoked potensials in man, monkey, cat, and rat. Exp Neurol 1981;72:592-611.
9. Dong WK, Harkins SW, Ashleman BT. Origins of cat somatosensory far-field and early near-field evoked potentials. Electroenchepharogr Clin Neurophysiol 1982;53:143-65.
10. Johnson PC. Review of previous studies and current theories of autoregulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc 1964;14(15 suppl I):2-9.
11. Hallenbeck JM, Dutka AJ, Tanishima T. Polymorpho-nuclear leukocyte accumulation in brain regions with low blood flow during the early postischemic period. Stroke 1986;17:246-53.
12. Sagawa K, Carrier O, Guyton AC. Elicitation of theoretically predicted feedback oscillation in arterial pressure. Am J Physiol 1962;203:141-6.
13. Guyton AC, Harris JW. Pressoreceptor-autonomic oscillation; a probable cause of vasomoter waves. Am J Physiol 1951;165:158-65.
14. Branston NM, Symon L, Crockard HA, Pasztor E. Relationship between the cortical evoked potential and local cortical blood flow following acute middle cerebral artery occlusion in the baboon. Exp Neurol 1974;45:195-208.
15. Minamide H. Prediction of reversibility of cerebral functions evaluated by somatosensory evoked potentials in experimental transient focal cerebral ischemia in cats. J Juzen Med Soc 1990;99:201-15 (in Japanese).
16. Liszczak TM, Hedley-Whyte ET, Adams JF. Limitations of tetrazolium salts in delineating infarcted brain. Acta Neuro-pathol (Berl) 1984;65:150-7.
17. Masuda H, Ogata T, Kikuchi K. Physiological changes during temporary occlusion of the superior vena cava in cynomolgus monkeys. Ann Thorac Surg 1989;47:890-6.