The culture of unpaid and voluntary egg donation should be strengthened

British Medical Journal

Volumn 314, Issue 7091, 1997, Pages 1401-1402

  Johnson, Martin H ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Reproductive Sciences ^*  (United Kingdom)

^c HFEA   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; FEE; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; OOCYTE DONATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0030894575     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.314.7091.1401     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. Directions issued under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. London: Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 23 July 1991. (Ref D.)
2. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. London: HMSO, 1990. (Section 12e.)
3. Robertson J. Ethical and legal isues in human egg donation. Fertil Steril 1989;52:353-63.
4. Sauer MV. Oocyte donation: reflections on past work and future directions. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1149-50.
5. Ahuja KK, Simons EG. Anonymous egg donation and dignity. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1151-4.
6. Ahuja KK, Simons EG, Fiamanya W, Dalton M, Armor NA, Kirkpatrick P. Egg-sharing in assisted conception: ethical and practical considerations. Hum Reprod 1996;11:1126-31.
7. Royal College of Physicians Working Group. Research on health volunteers. London: RCP, 1986.
8. Cook R, Golombok S. A survey of semen donation: phase II - the view of the donors. Hum Reprod 1995;10:951-9.
9. Abdulla HI. A national oocyte donation society is needed. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2355-6.
10. Nuffield Council on BioEthics. Human tissue: ethical and legal issues. London: The Council, 1995.