The surgical pathologist in a client/server computer network: Work support, quality assurance, and the graphical user interface

Modern Pathology

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 259-266

  Dictor, Michael ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Anatomic pathology; Client server database; Computer application; Information system; Quality assurance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER; CYTOPATHOLOGY; GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; TECHNIQUE;

EID: 0030893211     PISSN: 08933952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Morrow JS. Information systems in surgical pathology. In: Rosai J, editor. Ackerman's surgical pathology. 7th ed. Vol 2. St. Louis: Mosby, 1989:1955-78.
2. McBroom HM, Ramsay AD. The clinicopathological meeting: a means of auditing diagnostic performance. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17:75-80.
3. Cechner RL. A multifunction network of computers in a large pathology department. Integration of word processing, data base management, and general purpose computing using network principles. Am J Clin Pathol 1983;79:472-80.
4. MacDonald RA, Pechet GS, Lovenbury P. Surgical pathology reports with a portable microcomputer. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1982;106:666-9.
5. Enlander D, Haberman S, Gibbs S. Medical diagnostic coding by microcomputer: III. Microcomputer graphics. J Clin Lab Aut 1983;3:269-72.
6. Bale PM. A comprehensive microcomputer network program for histopathology. Pathology 1991;23:263-7.
7. Aller RD, Aller DL, Pasia O. Anatomic pathology computer systems: a survey of vendors. CAP Today 1988;2:16-7, 34-9, 44.
8. Talamo TS, Losos FJ. Surgical pathology accessioning and management on a multiuser hard disk microcomputer system. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1985;109:19-23.
9. Dudrey EF, Watts MT. A dBaseIII surgical pathology reporting and encoding microcomputer system. Am J Clin Pathol 1990;93:91-7.
10. Tischler AS, Martin MR. Epitome. Generation of surgical pathology reports using a 5,000-word speech recognizer. Am J Clin Pathol 1989;92 Suppl 1:S44-S47.
11. Moore GW, Boitnott JK, Miller RE, Eggleston JC, Hutchins GM. Integrated pathology reporting, indexing, and retrieval system using natural language diagnoses. Mod Pathol 1988; 1:44-50.
12. Moore GW, Berman JJ. Object-oriented controlled-vocabulary translator using TRANSOFT + HyperPAD. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1991;973-5.
13. Moore GW, Berman JJ. Performance analysis of manual and automated systemized nomenclature of medicine (SNOMED) coding. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;101:253-6.
14. Board of Directors of the American Medical Informatics Association. Standards for medical identifiers, codes, and messages needed to create an efficient computer-stored medical record. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1994;1:1-7.
15. Penner DW. Quality assurance in anatomic pathology. In: Howanitz PJ, Howanitz JH, editors. Laboratory quality assurance. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1987:296-316.
16. Cowan DF. Implementing a regulation-compliant quality improvement program on a commercial laboratory information system. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 1992;14:407-14.
17. Standardization of the surgical pathology report. Ad-hoc committee of the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 1992;16:84-6.
18. Consultations in surgical pathology. Ad-hoc committee of the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 1993;17:743-5.
19. Banks PM. Incorporation of immunostaining data in anatomic pathology reports. Am J Surg Pathol 1992;16:808.