Sodium modelling and profiled ultrafiltration in conventional haemodialysis

Nephrology

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 177-182

  Parsons, Darren S ^a   Yuill, Elizabeth ^a   Llapitan, Myrna ^a   Harris, David C H ^a,b  

^a BLACKTOWN HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b WESTMEAD HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

dialysate; haemodialysis; hypotension; sodium modelling; ultrafiltration rate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEADACHE; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; MALE; MUSCLE CRAMP; NAUSEA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SODIUM METABOLISM; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 0030887685     PISSN: 13205358     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.1997.tb00212.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Daugirdas JT. Dialysis hypotension: A haemodynamic analysis. Kidney Int. 1991; 39: 233-46.
2. Henrich WL. Haemodynamic instability during hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 1986; 30: 605-12.
3. Daugirdas JT. Preventing and managing hypotension. Semin. Dial. 1994; 7: 276-83.
4. de Vries PMJM. Plasma volume changes during Hemodialysis. Semin. Dial. 1992; 5: 42-7.
5. Lins LE, Hedenhorg G, Jacobson SH et al. Blood pressure reduction during hemodialysis correlates to intradialytic changes in plasma volume. Clin. Nephrol 1992; 37: 308-13.
6. de Vries PMJM, Kouw PM, Olthof CG et al. The influence of dialysate sodium and variable ultrafiltration on fluid balance during haemodialysis. ASAIO Trans. 1990; 36: 821-24.
7. Ogden DA. A double blind crossover comparison of high and low sodium dialysis. Proc. Clin. Dial. Transplant. Forum 1978; 8: 157-65.
8. Raja R, Kramer M, Barber K, Chen S. Sequential changes in dialysate sodium during hemodialysis. Trans. Am. Soc. Artif. Intern. Organs 1983; 29: 649-51.
9. Swartz RD, Somermeyer MG, Hsu C. Preservation of plasma volume during hemodialysis depends on dialysate osmolality. Am. J. Nephrol. 1982; 2: 189-94.
10. Henrich WL, Woodard TD, McPhaul JJ. The chronic efficacy and safety of high sodium dialysate: Double-blind, crossover study. Am. J. Kid. Dis. 1982; 2: 349-53.
11. Barre PE, Brunelle G, Gascon-Barre M. A Randomised double blind trial of dialysate sodiums of 145 mEq/L, 150 mEq/L, and 155 mEq/L. ASAIO Trans. 1988; 34: 338-41.
12. Cybulsky AV, Matni A, Holomby DJ. Effects of high sodium dialysate during maintenance haemodialysis. Nephron 1985; 41: 57-61.
13. Daugirdas JT, Al-Kudsi RR, Ing TS, Norusis MJ. A double-blind evaluation of sodium gradient hemodialysis. Am. J. Nephrol. 1985; 5: 163-68.
14. Po CL, Afolabi M, Raja RM. The role of sequential ultrafiltration and varying dialysate sodium on vascular stability during haemodialysis. ASAIO J. 1993; 39: M798-M800.
15. Jenson BM, Dobbe SA, Squillace DP, McCarthy JT. Clinical benefits of high and variable sodium concentration dialysate in haemodialysis patients. ANNA J. 1994; 2: 115-20.
16. Sadowski RH, Allred EN, Jabs K. Sodium Modelling ameliorates intradialytic and interdialytic symptoms in young haemodialysis patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 1993; 4: 1192-8.
17. Acchiardo SR, Hayden AJ. Is Sodium modelling necessary in high flux dialysis? ASAIO Trans. 1991; 37: M135-7.
18. Peticlerc T, Trombert JC, Coevoet B et al. Electrolyte modelling: Sodium. Is dialysate sodium profiling actually useful? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 1996; 11 (Suppl. 2): 35-8.
19. de Vries PMJM, Olthof CG, Solf A et al Fluid balance during haemodialysis and haemofiltration: The effect of dialysate sodium and a variable ultrafiltration rate. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 1991; 6: 257-63.