Transferability of habitat suitability curves for a benthic minnow, rhinichthys cataractae

Journal of Freshwater Ecology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 379-393

  Glozier, Nancy E ^a   Culp, Joseph M ^a   Scrimgeour, Garry J ^b  

^a ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLOW REGIME; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; HABITAT SUITABILITY CURVE; LONGNOSE DACE; PHABSIM;

CANADA, (WEST);

RHINICHTHYS CATARACTAE;

EID: 0030886759     PISSN: 02705060     EISSN: 21566941     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.1997.9663548     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aadland, L. P., Cook, S. M., Negus, M. T., Drewes, H. G., and Anderson, C. S., 1991. Microhabitat preferences of selected stream fishes and a community-oriented approach to instream flow assessments. Minnesota Dept. Natural Resources. Section of Fisheries. Investigational Report No.406.
2. Armour, C. L., and Taylor, J. G., 1991. Evaluation of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service field users. Fisheries, 16:36–43.
3. Beecher, H., 1987. “ Simulating trout feeding stations in instream flow models. ”. In Regulated streams:advances in ecology. Edited by:Craig, J. F., and Kemper, J. B., 17–82. New York. NY:Plenum Press.
4. Bovee, K. D., 1978. The incremental method of assessing habitat potential for coolwater species, with management implications. American Fisheries Society Special Publication, 11:340–346.
5. Bovee, K. D., 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Instream Flow Information Paper No. 12. Washington. DC:U.S. Fish. and Wildlife Service (FWS/OBS—82/26).
6. Bovee, K. D., 1986. Development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria for use in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report, 86 (7) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C
7. Bovee, K. D., 1988. The use of risk analysis to establish error bounds for category I criteria Edited by:Bovee, K. D., and Zuboy, J. R., 130–133. Proceedings of a workshop on the development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 86(11). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C
8. Bozek, M. A., and Rahel, F. J., 1992. Generality of microhabitat suitability models for young Colorado River cutthroat (Oncorhynchus clarki pleuriticus) across sites and among years in Wyoming streams. Canadian Journal and Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49:552–564.
9. Cheslak, E. F., and Garcia, J. C., 1988. An evaluation of the effects of various smoothing and curve-fitting techniques on the accuracy of suitability functions Edited by:Bovee, K. D., and Zuboy, J. R., 259–283. Proceedings of a workshop on the development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 86(11). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C
10. Cheslak, E. F., and Jacobson, A. S., 1990. Integrating the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology with a population response model. Rivers, 1:264–288.
11. Conover, W. J., 1971. Practical nonparametric statistics New York. NY:Wiley.
12. Culp, J. M., 1989. Nocturnally constrained foraging of a lotic minnow (R. cataractae cataractae). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 67:2008–2012.
13. Culp, J. M., Hamilton, H. R., Sosiak, A. J., and Davies, R. W., 1992. “ Longitudinal Zonation of the Biota and Water Quality of the Bow River System in Alberta. Canada. ”. In Water Quality in North American River Systems. Battle Press. Columbus. Ohio. Edited by:Becker, C. D., and Neitzel, D. A., 29–49.
14. Degraaf, D. A., and Bain, L. H., 1986. Habitat use by and preferences of juvenile Atlantic salmon in Newfoundland rivers. Transactions of American Fisheries Society, 115:671–681.
15. Edwards, E. A., Li, H., and Schreck, C. B., 1983. Habitat suitability index models:longnose dace. U.S Fish and Wildlife Service Report No. FWS/OBS—82/10.33, Washington D.C.
16. Elliott, J. M., 1977. Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication, 25:1–160.
17. Glova, G. J., and Duncan, M. J., 1985. Potential effects of reduced flows on fish habitats in a large braided river, New Zealand. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 114:165–181.
18. Glozier, N. E., 1989. “ The effects of biotic and abiotic factors on the foraging success of a lotic minnow ”. In R. cataractae cataractae. M.Sc. thesis. Calgary. Alberta. Canada. University of Calgary, Department of Biological Sciences.
19. Gore, J. A., and Judy, R. D., Jr. 1981. Predictive models of benthic macroinvertebrate density for use in instream flow studies and regulated flow management. Canadian Journal and Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38:1363–1370.
20. Gore, J. A., and Nestler, J. M., 1988. Instream flow studies in perspective. Regulated Rivers:Research and Management, 2:93–101.
21. Groshens, T. P., and Orth, D. J., 1994. Transferability of habitat suitability criteria for smallmouth bass. Micropterous dolomieu. Rivers, 4:194–212.
22. Heggenes, J., 1990. Habitat utilization and preferences in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in streams. Regulated Rivers, 5:341–354.
23. Hubert, W. A., and Rahel, R. J., 1989. Relations of physical habitat to abundance of four nongame fishes in high-plains streams:a test of habitat suitability index models. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 9:332–340.
24. Jirka, K. J., and Homa, J., Jr. 1990. Development and preliminary evaluation of suitability index curves for juvenile brook trout. Rivers, 1:207–217.
25. Johnson, J. H., Dropkin, D. S., and Shaffer, P. G., 1992. Habitat use by a headwater stream fish community in North-central Pennsylvannia. Rivers, 3:69–79.
26. Lambert, T. R., and Hanson, D. F., 1989. Development of habitat suitability criteria for trout in small streams. Regulated Rivers:Research and Management, 3:291–303.
27. Mathur, D., Bason, W. H., Purdy, E. J., Jr. and Silver, C. A., 1985. A critique of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 42:825–831.
28. Morhardt, J. E., and Hanson, D. F., 1988. Habitat availability considerations in the development of suitability criteria Edited by:Bovee, K. D., and Zuboy, J. R., 392–407. Proceedings of a workshop on the development and evaluation of habitat suitability criteria. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Report 86(11). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C
29. Morn, A., Harber, D., and Peters, R. H., 1986. Microhabitat-preference curves of blackfly larvae (Diptera:Simuliidae):comparison of three estimation methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 43:1235–1241.
30. Morisawa, M., 1985. Rivers form and process Longman Inc. New York
31. Moyle, P. B., and Baltz, D. M., 1985. Microhabitat use by an assemblage of California stream fishes:developing criteria for instream flow determinations. Transactions of American Fisheries Society, 114:695–704.
32. Orth, D. J., and Maughan, O. E., 1986. In defense of the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences., 43:1092–1093.
33. Orth, D. J., 1987. Ecological considerations in the development and application of instream flow-habitat models. Regulated Rivers:Research and Management, 11:171–181.
34. Reiser, D. W., Wesche, T. A., and Estes, C., 1989. Status of instream flow litigation and practices in North America. Fisheries, 14:22–29.
35. Rimmer, D. M., Paim, U., and Saunders, R. L., 1984. Changes in the selection of microhabitat by juvenile Atlantic salmon (salmo salar) at the summer-autumn transition in a small river. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 41:469–475.
36. Scrimgeour, G. J., Culp, J. M., and Glozier, N. E., 1993. An improved technique for sampling lotic invertebrates. Hydrobiologia, 254:65–71.
37. Scott, D., and Shirvell, C. S., 1987. “ A critique of the instream flow incremental methodology and observations on flow determination in New Zealand. ”. In (editors) Regulated Streams:Advances in Ecology. Edited by:Craig, J. F., and Kemper, J. R., 27–43. New York. NY:Plenum Press.
38. Shirvell, C. S., 1986. Pitfalls of physical habitat simulation in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Canadian Technical Report Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences No., 1460:1–68.
39. Shirvell, C. S., 1989. Ability of PHABSIM to predict chinook salmon spawning habitat. Regulated Rivers:Research and Management, 3:277–289.
40. Shuler, S. W., and Nehring, R. B., 1994. Using the Physical Habitat Simulation model to evaluate a stream habitat enhancement project. Rivers, 4:175–193.
41. Thomas, J. A., and Bovee, K. D., 1993. Application and testing of a procedure to evaluate transferability of habitat suitability criteria. Regulated Rivers:Research and Management, 8:285–294.
42. Zar, J. H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd Edition Prentice-Hall., Inc. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey