Response of calcareous grassland plant species to diffuse competition: Results from a removal experiment

Journal of Ecology

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 479-490

  Mclellan, A J ^a   Law, R ^a   Fitter, A H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Calcareous grassland; Coexistence; Diffuse competition; Morphological plasticity; Removal experiment; Species rich

Indexed keywords

CALCAREOUS GRASSLAND; DIFFUSE COMPETITION; GAP SIZE COMPETITION; REMOVAL EXPERIMENT;

DERBYSHIRE; ENGLAND; UK;

BRIZA MEDIA; CAREX CARYOPHYLLEA; CYPERACEAE; FABACEAE; LANCEOLATA; LOTUS CORNICULATUS; PLANTAGINACEAE; PLANTAGO; PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA; POACEAE; ROSACEAE; SANGUISORBA; SANGUISORBA MINOR;

EID: 0030886073     PISSN: 00220477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2960571     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Aarssen, L.W. & Epp, G.A. (1990) Neighbor manipulations in natural vegetation: a review. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1, 13-30.
2. Allen, E.B. & Forman, R.T.T. (1976) Plant species removals and old-field community structure and stability. Ecology, 66, 1233-1243.
3. Aphalo, P.J. & Ballaré, C.L. (1995) The importance of information-acquiring systems in plant-plant interactions. Functional Ecology, 9, 5-14.
4. Ballaré, C.L., Sánchez, R.A., Scopel, A.L., Casal, J.J. & Ghersa, C.M. (1987) Early detection of neighbour plants by phytochrome perception of spectral changes in reflected sunlight. Plant, Cell and Environment, 10, 551-557.
5. Ballaré, C.L., Scopel, A.L. & Sánchez, R.A. (1990) Far-red radiation reflected from adjacent leaves: an early signal of competition in plant canopies. Science, 247, 329-332.
6. Bell, G. & Lechowicz, M.J. (1994) Spatial heterogeneity at small scales and how plants respond to it. Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants (eds M. M. Caldwell & R. W. Pearcy), pp. 391-414. Academic Press, San Diego.
7. Berendse, F. (1983) Interspecific competition and niche differentiation between Plantago lanceolata and Anthoxantham odoratum in a natural hayfield. Journal of Ecology, 71, 379-390.
8. Birch, C.P.D., Read, D.J. & Rorison, I.H. (1990) VA mycorrhizal infection of four species in a semi-natural grassland. Calcareous Grasslands - Ecology and Management (eds S. H. Hillier, D. W. H Dalton & D. A. Wells), p. 182. Bluntisham Books, Bluntisham.
9. Clements, F.E. (1916) Plant Succession: An Analysis of Community Functions. Carnegie Institute, Washington.
10. Clements, F.E., Weaver, J.E. & Hanson, H.C. (1929) Plant Competition: An Analysis of Community Functions. Carnegie Institute, Washington.
11. Council, J.H. (1983) On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. American Naturalist, 122, 661-696.
12. Díaz, S., Grime, J.P., Harris, J. & MacPherson, E. (1993) Evidence of a feedback mechanism limiting plant response to elevated carbon dioxide. Nature, 364, 616-617.
13. Dong, M. (1994) Foraging through morphological responses in clonal herbs. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
14. Fitter, A.H. (1986) Acquisition and utilization of resources. Plant Ecology (ed. M. J. Crawley), pp. 375-405. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
15. Fitter, A.H. (1987) Spatial and temporal separation of activities in plant communities: prerequisite or consequence of coexistence. Organization of Plant Communities Past and Present (eds J. Gee & P. Giller), pp. 119-140. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
16. Fitter, R., Fitter, A. H. & Farrer, A. (1984) Grasses, Sedges, Rushes and Ferns of Britain and Northern Europe. Harper Collins, Glasgow.
17. Ford, M.A. (1990) Above- and below-ground competition in chalk grassland. Calcareous Grasslands - Ecology and Management (eds S. H. Hillier, D. W. H Dalton & D. A. Wells), pp. 88. Bluntisham Books, Bluntisham.
18. Fowler, N. (1981) Competition and coexistence in a N. Carolina grassland. II. The effects of experimental removal of species. Journal of Ecology, 69, 843-854.
19. Gleason, H.A. (1926) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 44, 463-481.
20. Goldberg, D.E. (1987) Neighborhood competition in an oldfield plant community. Ecology, 68, 1211-1223.
21. Goldberg, D.E. (1990) Components of resource competition in plant communities. Perspectives on Plant Competition (eds J. B. Grace & D. Tilman), pp. 51-65. Academic Press, California.
22. Goldberg, D.E. & Barton, A.M. (1992) Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. American Naturalist, 139, 771-801.
23. Goldberg, D.E. & Werner, P.A. (1983) Equivalence of competitors in plant communities: a null hypothesis and a field experimental approach. American Journal of Botany, 70, 1098-1104.
24. Grace, J.B. (1990) On the relationship between plant traits and competitive ability. Perspectives on Plant Competition (eds J. B. Grace & D. Tilman), pp. 51-65. Academic Press, California.
25. Grace, J.B. (1995) On the measurement of plant competitive intensity. Ecology, 76, 305-308.
26. Grace, J.B. & Wetzal, R.G. (1981) Habitat partitioning and competitive displacement in cattails (Typha): experimental field studies. American Naturalist, 118, 463-474.
27. Grime, J.P. (1973) Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature, 242, 344-347.
28. Grime, J.P. (1979) Plant Strategies and Vegetation Dynamics. Wiley, Chichester.
29. Grime, J.P. (1987) Dominant and subordinate components of plant communities: implications for succession, stability and diversity. Colonization, Succession and Stability (eds A. J. Gray, M. J. Crawley & P. J. Edwards), pp. 413-428. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
30. Grime, J.P., Hodgson, J.G. & Hunt, R. (1988) Comparative Plant Ecology: a Functional Approach to Some Common British Species. Unwin Hyman, London.
31. Grubb, P.J. (1986) Problems posed by sparse and patchily distributed species in species-rich plant communities. Community Ecology (eds J. M. Diamond & T. J. Case), pp. 207-225. Harper and Row, New York.
32. Gurevitch, J., Wilson, P., Stone, J.L., Teese, P. & Stoutenburgh, R.J. (1990) Competition among old-field perennials at different levels of soil fertility and available space. Journal of Ecology, 78, 727-744.
33. Harper, J.L. (1961) Approaches to the study of plant competition. Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology, 15, 1-39.
34. Harper, J.L. (1977) The Population Biology of Plants. Harper and Row, New York.
35. Herben, T. & Krahulec, F. (1990) Competitive hierarchies, reversals of rank order and the de Wit approach: are they compatible? Oikos, 58, 254-256.
36. Hook, P.B., Lauenroth, W.K. & Burke, I.C. (1994) Spatial patterns of roots in semi-arid grassland: abundance of canopy openings and regeneration gaps. Journal of Ecology, 82, 485-494.
37. Hulme, P.E. (1994) Post-dispersal seed predation in grassland: its magnitude and sources of variation. Journal of Ecology, 82, 645-652.
38. Huston, M. (1979) A general hypothesis of species diversity. American Naturalist, 113, 81-101.
39. Hutchings, M.J. & de Kroon, H. (1994) Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasiticity in resource acquisition. Advances in Ecological Research, 25, 159-238.
40. Law, R. & Watkinson, A.R. (1989) Competition. Ecological Concepts. The Contribution of Ecology to an Understanding of the Natural World (ed. J. M. Cherrett), pp. 245-284. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
41. McLellan, A.J. (1995) The ecology of a limestone grassland: competition and spatio-temporal dynamics. PhD thesis, University of York.
42. McLellan, A.J., Fitter, A.H. & Law, R. (1995) On decaying roots, mycorrhizal infection and the design of perturbation experiments. Journal of Ecology, 83, 225-230.
43. Mahdi, A. (1988) The plant ecology of a limestone grassland: spatial organisation and coexistence. PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.
44. Mahdi, A., Law, R. & Willis, A.J. (1989) Large niche overlaps among coexisting species in a limestone grassland community. Journal of Ecology, 77, 386-400.
45. Mead, R. & Curnow, R.N. (1983) Statistical Methods in Agricultural and Experimental Biology. Chapman and Hall, London.
46. Miller, T.E. & Werner, P.A. (1987) Competitive effects and responses in a first-year-old field plant community. Ecology, 68, 1201-1210.
47. Mitchell, P.L. & Woodward, F.I. (1986) Responses of three woodland herbs to reduced photosynthetically active radiation and low red to far-red ratio in shade. Journal of Ecology, 76, 807-825.
48. Mitchley, J. (1988) Control of the relative abundance of perennials in a chalk grassland in southern England. II. Vertical canopy structure. Journal of Ecology, 76, 341-50.
49. Mitchley, J. (1990) Control of relative abundance of perennial dicotyledons in chalk grassland. Calcareous Grasslands - Ecology and Management (eds S. H. Hillier, D. W. H Dalton & D. A. Wells), pp. 67-73. Bluntisham Books, Bluntisham.
50. Mitchley, J. & Grubb, P.J. (1986) Control of the relative abundance of perennials in chalk grassland in southern England. I. Constancy of rank order and results of pot- and field- experiments on the role of interference. Journal of Ecology, 74, 1139-1166.
51. Mortimer, S.R. (1992) Root length/leaf area ratios of chalk grassland plants and their importance for competitive interactions. Journal of Vegetation Science, 3, 665-672.
52. Mortimer, S. R. (1993) The control of population size of sparse perennials in chalk grassland. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
53. Newman, E.I. (1973) Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation. Nature, 244, 310.
54. Norusis, M.J. (1990) SPSS® Base System User Guide. SPSS Incorporated, Chicago, Illinois.
55. Peat, H.J. & Fitter, A.H. (1993) The distribution of arbuscular mycorrhizas in the British Flora. New Phytologist, 125, 845-854.
56. Pigott, C.D. (1962) Soil formation and development on the carboniferous limestone of Derbyshire. I. Parent materials. Journal of Ecology, 50, 145-156.
57. Pinder, J.E. (1975) Effects of species removals on an old-field community. Ecology, 56, 747-751.
58. Rodwell, J. (1993) British Plant Communities. Vol. 3. Grasslands and Montane Communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
59. Schoener, T.E. (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. American Naturalist, 122, 240-285.
60. Seastedt, T.R. (1988) Mass nitrogen and phosphorous dynamics in foliage and root detritus of tallgrass prairie. Ecology, 69, 59-65.
61. Silvertown, J. & Dale, P. (1991) Competitive hierarchies and the structure of herbaceous plant communities. Oikos, 61, 441-444.
62. Silvertown, J. & Smith, B. (1988) Gaps in the canopy: the missing dimension in vegetation dynamics. Vegetatio, 65, 163-173.
63. Silvertown, J., Lines, C.E.M. & Dale, P. (1994) Spatial competition between grasses - rates of mutual invasion between four species and the interaction with grazing. Journal of Ecology, 82, 31-38.
64. Smith, H. (1994) Sensing the light environment: the functions of the phytochrome family. Photomorphogenesis in Plants (eds R. E. Kendrick & G. H. M. Kronenberg), pp. 377-418. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
65. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1981) Biometry, 2nd edn. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.
66. Stace, C. (1991) New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
67. Thompson, K. & Grime, J.P. (1988) Competition reconsidered - a reply to Tilman. Functional Ecology, 2, 114-116.
68. Tilman, D. (1982) Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
69. Tilman, D. (1986) Resources, competition and the dynamics of plant communities. Plant Ecology (ed. M. J. Crawley), pp. 51-76. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
70. Tilman, D. (1987) On the meaning of competition and the mechanisms of competitive superiority. Functional Ecology, 1, 304-315.
71. Watkinson, A.R. & Harper, J.L. (1978) The demography of a sand dune annual: Vulpia fasciculata. I. The natural regulation of populations. Journal of Ecology, 66, 15-33.
72. Weiner, J. (1986) How competition for light and nutrients affects size variability in Ipmoea ticolor populations. Ecology, 67, 1427-1437.
73. Weldon, C.W. & Slausen, W.L. (1986) The intensity of competition vs. its importance: an overlooked distinction and its implications. Quarterly Review of Biology, 61, 23-44.