A multicentre evaluation of the CA 15-3 assay, CA 19-9 assay and CA 125II assay on the bayer immuno l® system

European Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry

Volumn 35, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 637-644

  Römer, Martina ^a  

^a Children's Hospital   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CA 125 ANTIGEN; CA 15-3 ANTIGEN; CA 19-9 ANTIGEN; TUMOR MARKER;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYZER; CALIBRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; IMMUNOASSAY; LABORATORY TEST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANTIGENS, TUMOR-ASSOCIATED, CARBOHYDRATE; CA-125 ANTIGEN; CA-15-3 ANTIGEN; CA-19-9 ANTIGEN; HUMANS; IMMUNOASSAY; LINEAR MODELS; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; TUMOR MARKERS, BIOLOGICAL;

EID: 0030886056     PISSN: 09394974     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Haeckel R, Römer M, Sonntag O, Vassault A, Naudin C. Recommendations for the multicentre evaluation. In: Haeckel R, editor. Evaluation methods in laboratory medicine. Weinheim, New York, Basel, Cambridge: VCH Verlag, 1993:47-69.
2. European Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (ECCLS). Guidelines for the Evaluation of Analysers in Clinical Chemistry. ECCLS Document Vol. 3 No. 2. Berlin, Köln: Beuth Verlag, 1986.
3. Michotey O, Dörr R, Bouderont D, Gaya J, Rivera F, Benz R, Schmidt M. Thyroid testing using the Cobas Core Immunoassay System -a multicentre study. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995; 33:609-22.
4. Diver MJ. The Role of estradiol and progesterone in the investigation of fertility. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium; 1996 Feb 4-6; Paris. Chase Medical Communications Inc. 1996:17-9.
5. Gaya-Beltran J. 17ß-Estradiol and progesterone method assessment in the Technicon Immuno l system, 2 years experience. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium; 1996 Feb 4-6; Paris. Chase Medical Communications Inc. 1996:21-6.
6. Sherwood RA. Use of Multiple Tumor Markers in Patients with Liver Disease. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium. Chase Medical Communications Inc. 1996:49 -54.
7. Letellier M, Levesque A, Daigle F, Grant A. Performance evaluation of automated immunoassays on the Technicon Immuno 1 system. Clin Chem 1996; 33:1695-701.
8. Goldschmidt HMJ. The benefits of high-precision immunoanalysis in medical practice, the Technicon Immuno 1 system a quality instrument. Proceedings of the 3rd and 4th Technicon Immuno l Symposia; 1995 Feb 3-5; Paris. New York. Caduceus Medical Publishers, 1995:5-15.
9. Büscher KH. Technicon Immuno 1. Lab Med 1994; 6:292-3.
10. Okuda K. Provisional Guidelines (1980) for listing specifications of clinical chemical analyses. IFCC Document. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1980; 18:947-51.
11. Fraser CG, Hyltoft Petersen P, Ricos C, Haeckel R. Quality specifications. In: Haeckel R, editor. Evaluation methods in laboratory medicine. Weinheim, New York, Basel, Cambridge: VCH Verlag 1993:87-99.
12. EP6 Proposed Guideline. NCCLS Evaluation Protocols Document 1986; 6 No. 18:509-75.
13. Stockmann W, Bablok W, Bayer PM, Keller, F, Schweiger CR. Criteria of practicability. In: Haeckel R, editor. Evaluation methods in laboratory medicine. Weinheim, New York, Basel, Cambridge: VCH Verlag, 1993:185-201.
14. Passing H, Bablok WJ. Comparison of several regression procedures for method comparison studies and determination of sample sizes. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1984;22:43145.
15. Bablok W, Haeckel R, Meyers W, Wosniok W. Biometrical methods. In: Haeckel R, editor. Evaluation methods in laboratory medicine. Weinheim, New York, Basel, Cambridge: CVH Verlag, 1993:203-41.