Shock-wave measurement using a calibrated interferometric fiber-tip sensor

Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 1259-1266

  Koch, Christian ^a   Molkenstruck, Walter ^a   Reibold, Rainer ^a  

^a PHYSIKALISCH TECHNISCHE BUNDESANSTALT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fiberoptic sensors; Interferometry; Lithotripsy; Shock waves; Shock wave measurement

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; BIOSENSORS; FIBER OPTIC CHEMICAL SENSORS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; OPTICAL TRANSFER FUNCTION; SHOCK WAVES;

ELECTROMAGNETIC LITHOTRIPTOR; LITHOTRIPSY; MICHELSON INTERFEROMETER; SHOCK WAVE MEASUREMENT; SHOCK WAVE TREATMENT;

INTERFEROMETRY;

ARTICLE; INTERFEROMETRY; LITHOTRIPSY; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSOR; SHOCK WAVE;

ALGORITHMS; FIBER OPTICS; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HIGH-ENERGY SHOCK WAVES; HUMANS; INTERFEROMETRY; LITHOTRIPSY;

EID: 0030884532     PISSN: 03015629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-5629(97)00127-0     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ahrendt WR, Taplin JF. Automatic feedback control. New York: McGraw Hill, 1951;137-151.
2. Chaussy CG. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: past, present, and future. In: Lingeman JE, Newman DM, ed. Shock wave lithotripsy: state of the art. New York: Plenum Press, 1988:1-9.
3. Coleman AJ, Saunders JE. A survey of the acoustic output of commercial extracorporeal shock wave lithotripters. Ultrasound Med Biol 1989;15:213-227.
4. Dahmen GP, Franke R, Gonchars V, Poppe K, Lentrodt St, Lichtenberger S, Jost S, Montigel J, Nam VC, Dahmen G. Die Behandlung knochennaher Weichteilschmerzen mit Extrakorporaler Stoßwellentherapie (ESWT), Indikation, Technik und bisherige Ergebnisse. In: Chaussy C, Eisenberger F, Jocham D, Wilbert D, eds. Die Stoßwelle. Tübingen: Attempto, 1995:175-186.
5. Dawson C, Whitfield HN. The current status of lithotripsy. J Med Eng Tech 1994;18:224-229.
6. Delius M, Ueberle F, Gambihler S. Acoustic energy determines haemoglobin release from erythrocytes by extracorporeal shock waves in vitro. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995;21:707-710.
7. Endl E, Steinbach P, Schärfe J, Fickweiler S, Wörle K, Hofstädter F. Cell-type-specific response to shock waves of suspended or pelleted cells as analysed by flow cytometry or electrical cell volume determination. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22:515-525.
8. Gamarra F, Spelsberg F, Dellian M, Goetz AE. Complete local tumor remission after therapy with extra-corporeally applied high-energy shock waves (HESW). Int J Cancer 1993;55:153-146.
9. Granz B. Measurement of shock wave properties after the passage through a tissue mimicking material. In: Levy A. Schneider S-C, McAvoy BR. (eds). Ultrasonics Symposium. IEEE, New York, 1994:1847-1851.
10. Granz B, Holzapfel R, Köhler G. Measurement of shock waves in the focus of a lithotriptor. In: Ultrasonics Symposium. IEEE, New York, 1989;991-994.
11. Granz B, Köhler G. What makes a shock wave efficient in lithotripsy? J Stone Dis 1992;4:123-128.
12. Harris GR. Lithotripsy pulse measurement errors due to nonideal hydrophone and amplifier frequency response. IEEE Trans UFFC 1992;39:256-261.
13. Hodnett M, Zeqiri B. A strategy for the development and standardisation of measurement methods for high power/cavitating ultrasonic fields: Review of high power field measurement techniques-Report CIRA(EXT)015. Teddington: NPL, 1997.
14. Huber P, Debus J, Peschke P, Hahn EW, Lorenz WJ. In vivo detection of ultrasonically induced cavitation by a fiber-optic technique. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994;20:811-825.
15. Koch C. Coated fiber-optic hydrophone for ultrasonic measurement. Ultrasonics 1996;34:687-689.
16. Koch C, Reibold R. Interferometric fiber-optic sensor for measurement of lithotriptor shock waves. Proc World Congr Ultrasonics 1995: 931-935.
17. Koch C, Ludwig G, Molkenstruck W. Calibration of an interferometric fiber tip sensor for ultrasound detection. Ultrasonics 1997 35:297-303, 1997.
18. Menssen W, Molkenstruck W, Reibold R. Fibre optic sensor system. In: Ultrasonics International Conference Proceedings., IEEE, New York 1991:347-350.
19. Oosterhof GON, Cornel EB, Smits GAHJ, Debruyne FMJ, Schalken JA. The influence of high-energy shock waves on the development of metastases. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996;22:339-344.
20. Pittomvils G, Lafaut JP, Vandeursen H, DeRidder D, Baert L, Boving R. Macroscopic ESWL-induced cavitation: in vitro studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995;21:393-398.
21. Platte M. A polyvinylidene fluoride needle hydrophone for ultrasonic applications. Ultrasonics 1985;24:113-118.
22. Radiation Safety Committee. Guidelines for the safe use of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) devices. Statement from the Radiation Safety Committee of the European Federation of the societies for ultrasound in medicine and biology. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994;20:315-316.
23. Reibold R, Menssen W, Molkenstruck W. Diffraction phenomena affecting the properties of the fibre-optic sensor system. In: Ultrasonics International Conference Proceedings., Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, Oxford 1993;97-100.
24. Rompe JD, Rumler F, Hopf Ch, Nafe B, Heine J. Extracorporal shock wave therapy for calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1995;321:196-201.
25. Staudenraus J, Eisenmenger W. Fibre-optic probe hydrophone for ultrasonic and shock-wave measurements in water. Ultrasonics 1993;31:267-273.
26. Suhr D, Brümmer F, Irmer U, Hölser DF. Disturbance of cellular calcium homeostasis by in vitro application of shock waves. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996;22:671-679.
27. Ziskin MC, Lewin PA. Ultrasonic exposimetry. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1993:85-112.